GA topology optimization using random keys for tree encoding of structures

  • J. F. Aguilar Madeira
  • H. L. Pina
  • H. C. Rodrigues
RESEARCH PAPER

Abstract

Topology optimization consists in finding the spatial distribution of a given total volume of material for the resulting structure to have some optimal property, for instance, maximization of structural stiffness or maximization of the fundamental eigenfrequency. In this paper a Genetic Algorithm (GA) employing a representation method based on trees is developed to generate initial feasible individuals that remain feasible upon crossover and mutation and as such do not require any repairing operator to ensure feasibility. Several application examples are studied involving the topology optimization of structures where the objective functions is the maximization of the stiffness and the maximization of the first and the second eigenfrequencies of a plate, all cases having a prescribed material volume constraint.

Keywords

Structural topology design Eigenfrequency design Optimization Genetic algorithms Graph theory 

References

  1. ABAQUS (2003) ABAQUS, version 6.4. HKS, PawtucketGoogle Scholar
  2. Abuali FN, Wainwright RL, Schoenefeld DA (1995) Determinant factorization: a new encoding scheme for spanning trees applied to the probabilistic minimum spanning tree problem. In: Eshelman LJ (ed) Proc. of the sixth int. conf. on genetic algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 470–477Google Scholar
  3. Aguilar Madeira JF, Rodrigues HC, Pina HL (2005) Multi-objective optimization of structures topology by genetic algorithms. Adv Eng Softw 36(1):21–28MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aguilar Madeira JF, Rodrigues HC, Pina HL (2006) Multi-objective topology optimization of structures using genetic algorithms with chromosome repairing. Struct Multidisc Optim 32(1):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin MJ (1896) A new factor in evolution. Am Nat 30(354):441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin MJ (1897) Organic selection. Science, New Series 5(121):634–636Google Scholar
  7. Bean JC (1994) Genetic algorithms and random keys for sequencing and optimization. ORSA J Comput 6:154–160MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bendsøe MP (1995) Optimization of structural topology, shape, and material. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  9. Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL (1990) Introduction to algorithms. MIT, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Diaz AR, Kikuchi N (1992) Solutions to shape and topology eigenvalue optimization problems using a homogenization method. Int J Numer Method Eng 35:1487–1502MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Du J, Olhoff N (2007) Topological design of freely vibrating continuum structures for maximum values of simple and multiple eigenfrequencies and frequency gaps. Struct Multidisc Optim 34(2):91–110CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Gross JL, Yellen J (2006) Graph theory and its applications. Chapman & Hall, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Hajela P (1993) Genetic algorithms in structural topology optimization. In: Bendsøe MP, Soares CM (eds) Topology design of structures. Kluwer, Deventer, pp 117–133Google Scholar
  14. Krog LA, Olhoff N (1999) Optimum topology and reinforcement design of disk and plate structures with multiple stiffness and eigenfrequency objectives. Comput Struct 72:535–563MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kruskal JB (1956) On the shortest spanning subtree and the traveling salesman problem. Proc Am Math Soc 7:48–50CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Ma ZD, Kikuchi N, Cheng HC (1994) Structural design for obtaining desired eigenfrequencies by using the topology and shape optimization method. Comput Syst Eng 5:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma ZD, Kikuchi N, Cheng HC (1995) Topological design for vibrating structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 121:259–280MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Norman BA, Smith AE (1997) Random keys genetic algorithm with adaptive penalty function for optimization of constrained facility layout problems. In: 4 Proceedings of the fourth conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 407–411Google Scholar
  19. Palmer CC, Kershenbaum A (1997) Representing trees in genetic algorithms. In: Back T, Fogel DB, Michalewicz Z (eds) Handbook of evolutionary computation, pages G1.3. Institute of Physics Publishing and Oxford University Press, Bristol, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  20. Pedersen NL (2000) Maximization of eigenvalues using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 20:2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rothlauf F, Goldberg DE, Heinzl A (2002) Network random keys: a tree representation scheme for genetic and evolutionary algorithms. Evol Comput 10:75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rozvany G (2001) Aims, scope, methods, history and unifield terminology of computer-aided topology optimization in structural mechanics. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 21:90–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simo JC, Rifai MS (1990) A class of assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29:1595–1638MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. TOPOPT: research group headed by Sigmund O. and Bendsøe MP (2008) Homepage. www.topopt.dtu.dk
  25. Wall M (1996) GAlib: a C++ library of genetic algorithm components. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang SY, Tai K, Wang MY (2006) An enhanced genetic algorithm for structural topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65:18–44MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson EL, Taylor RL, Doherty WP, Ghaboussi J (1973) Incompatible displacement models. In: Fenves SF, Perrone N, Robinson AR, Schnobrich WC (eds) Numerical and computer models in structural mechanics. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Aguilar Madeira
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. L. Pina
    • 1
  • H. C. Rodrigues
    • 1
  1. 1.IDMEC - ISTLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.ISEL - Instituto Superior de Engenharia de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations