Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 227–243 | Cite as

Robust design with arbitrary distributions using Gauss-type quadrature formula

  • S. H. Lee
  • W. ChenEmail author
  • B. M. Kwak


In this paper, we present the Gauss-type quadrature formula as a rigorous method for statistical moment estimation involving arbitrary input distributions and further extend its use to robust design optimization. The mathematical background of the Gauss-type quadrature formula is introduced and its relation with other methods such as design of experiments (DOE) and point estimate method (PEM) is discussed. Methods for constructing one dimensional Gauss-type quadrature formula are summarized and the insights are provided. To improve the efficiency of using it for robust design optimization, a semi-analytic design sensitivity analysis with respect to the statistical moments is proposed for two different multi-dimensional integration methods, the tensor product quadrature (TPQ) formula and the univariate dimension reduction (UDR) method. Through several examples, it is shown that the Gauss-type quadrature formula can be effectively used in robust design involving various non-normal distributions. The proposed design sensitivity analysis significantly reduces the number of function calls of robust optimization using the TPQ formulae, while using the UDR method, the savings of function calls are observed only in limited situations.


Robust design Gauss-type quadrature formula Tensor product quadrature Univariate dimension reduction method Analytical design sensitivity analysis Design optimization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1965) Handbook of mathematical functions, with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen W, Allen JK, Tsui KL, Mistree F (1996) Procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. J Mech Design 118:478–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi JH, Lee WH, Park JJ, Youn BD (2008) A study on robust design optimization of layered plate bonding process considering uncertainties. Struct Multidisc Optim 35:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D’Errico JR, Zaino NA (1988) Statistical tolerancing using a modification of Taguchi’s method. Technometrics 30:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du X, Chen W (2000) Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design. J Mech Design 122:385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engels H (1980) Numerical quadrature and cubature. Academic, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans DH (1967) An application of numerical integration techniques to statistical tolerancing. Technometrics 9:441–456CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Gautschi W (1994) Algorithm 726; orthpol—a package of routines for generating orthogonal polynomials and gauss-type quadrature rules. ACM T Math Software 20:21–62zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hahn GJ, Shapiro SS (1967) Statistical models in engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Han JS, Kwak BM (2004) Robust optimization using a gradient index: MEMS applications. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harr ME (1989) Probability estimate for multivariate analysis. Appl Math Model 13:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hong HP (1998) An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 59:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang B, Du X (2007) Analytical robustness assessment for robust design. Struct Multidisc Optim 34:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jung DH, Lee BC (2002) Development of a simple and efficient method for robust optimization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 53:2201–2215zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Krylov VI (1962) Approximate calculation of integrals. Translated by AH Stroud. Macmillan, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kugele SC, Trosset MW, Watson LT (2008) Numerical integration in statistical decision-theoretic methods for robust design optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 36:457–475CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee SH, Chen W (2008) A comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box type problems. Struct Multidisc Optim. doi:10.1007/s00158-008-0234-7
  18. Lee SH, Kwak BM (2006) Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis. Struct Saf 28:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee KH, Park GJ (2001) Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables. Comput Struct 79:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee I, Choi KK, Du L, Gorsich D (2007) Dimension reduction method for reliability-based robust design optimization. Comput Struct 86:1550–1562. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee SH, Choi HS, Kwak BM (2008) Multi-level design of experiments for statistical moment and probability calculation. Struct Multidisc Optim. doi:10.1007/s00158-007-0215-2
  22. Li KS (1992) Point-estimate method for calculating statistical moments. J Eng Mech ASCE 118:1506–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu PL, Kiureghian AD (1986) Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probabilist Eng Mech 1:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Messac A, Yahaya I (2002) Multiobjective robust design using physical programming. Struct Multidisc Optim 23:357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parkinson A, Sorensen C, Pourhassan N (1993) A general approach for robust optimal design. J Mech Design 115:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phadke MS (1995) Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  27. Rahman S, Xu H (2004) A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probabilist Eng Mech 19:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramakrishnan B, Rao SS (1996) A general loss function based optimization procedure for robust design. Eng Optimiz 25:255-276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenblatt M (1952) Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann Math Stat 23:470–472zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenblueth E (1981) Two point estimates in probabilities. Appl Math Model 5:329–335zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. Seo HS, Kwak BM (2002) Efficient statistical tolerance analysis for general distributions using three-point information. Int J Prod Res 40:931–944zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sundaresan S, Ishii K, Houser DR (1995) A robust optimization procedure with variations on design variables and constraints. Eng Optimiz 24:101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taguchi G (1978) Performance analysis design. Int J Prod Res 16:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taguchi G, Wu Y (1980) Introduction to off-line quality control. Central Japan Quality Control Association, NagoyaGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang L, Beeson D, Wiggs G (2004) Efficient and accurate point estimate method for moments and probability distribution estimation. In: Proceedings of 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, 30 Aug–1 Sep 2004. Albany, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu H, Rahman S (2004) A generalized dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61:1992–2019zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Youn BD, Xi Z (2008) Reliability-based robust design optimization using the eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Struct Multidisc Optim. doi:10.1007/s00158-008-0239-2
  38. Zhao YG, Ono T (2001) Moment methods for structural reliability. Struct Saf 23:47–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations