Design optimization of stiffened storage tank for spacecraft

Industrial Application


Stiffened storage tank is an important structural component in spacecraft. Its structural weight is one of the key criterions in the design phase. This paper focuses on the design optimization of the structure by using finite element method, structural sensitivity analysis techniques, and sequential linear/quadratic programming aimed to reduce the structural weight. Design variables include the numbers of stiffeners, stiffeners’ section dimensions, and shell thickness distribution. Detailed finite element modeling processes are presented, which are the ways to construct the stiffener (beam orientation and offset) and shell elements and the ways to determine the analysis model and structural boundary conditions. A brief introduction to sensitivity analysis and optimization solution algorithm is also given. Main attention is paid to the studies of design optimization of the tank structure, including the selection of design cases, evaluation, and comparison of the optimal results. There are six design cases considered in the design procedures. Numerical results show that by using the above computational techniques, the structural weight is effectively reduced. In this work, MSC.Patran/Nastran is employed to construct the Finite Element Model (FEM), and JIFEX, which is developed in our group, is used to conduct the structural design optimization.


Stiffened shells Structural sensitivity analysis Structural design optimization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Afonso S, Sienz J, Belblidia F (2005) Structural optimization strategies for simple and integrally stiffened plates and shells. Eng Comput 22(3–4):429–452Google Scholar
  2. Belblidia F, Afonso S, Hinton E, Antonino G (1999) Integrated design optimization of stiffened plate structures. Eng Comput 16(8):934–951MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giles G (1999) Design-oriented analysis of aircraft fuselage structures using equivalent plate methodology. J Aircr 36(1):21–28Google Scholar
  4. Gu YX, Zhang HW, Guan ZQ, Kang Z, Li YP, Zhong WX (1999) New generation software of structural analysis and design optimization—JIFEX. Struct Eng Mech 7(6):589–599Google Scholar
  5. Gu YX, Zhao GZ, Zhang HW, Kang Z, Guandhi RV (2000) Buckling design optimization of complex built-up structures with shape and size variables. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 19(3):183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haftka RT, Gurdal Z (1992) Element of structural design optimization, 3rd ed. Netherlands, Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  7. Jarmai K, Snyman J, Farkas (2006) Minimum cost design of a welded orthogonally stiffened cylindrical shell. Comput Struct (84):787–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagaros N, Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M (2004) Optimum design of shell structures with stiffening beams. AIAA J 42(1):175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lamberti L, Venkataraman S, Haftka R, Johnson F (2003) Preliminary design optimization of stiffened panels using approximate analysis models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57:1351–1380MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Viljoen A, Visser A (2004) Computationally efficient analysis and optimization of stiffened thin-walled panels in shear. J Aircr 42(3):743–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Vitali R, Park O, Haftka RT, Sankar B (2002) Structural optimization of a hat-stiffened panel using response surfaces. J Aircr 39 (1):158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Biaosong Chen
    • 1
  • Gang Liu
    • 2
  • Jian Kang
    • 2
  • Yunpeng Li
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Department of Engineering MechanicsDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.China Academy of Space TechnologyBeijingPR China

Personalised recommendations