Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization

Research Paper


To ensure manufacturability and mesh independence in density-based topology optimization schemes, it is imperative to use restriction methods. This paper introduces a new class of morphology-based restriction schemes that work as density filters; that is, the physical stiffness of an element is based on a function of the design variables of the neighboring elements. The new filters have the advantage that they eliminate grey scale transitions between solid and void regions. Using different test examples, it is shown that the schemes, in general, provide black and white designs with minimum length-scale constraints on either or both minimum hole sizes and minimum structural feature sizes. The new schemes are compared with methods and modified methods found in the literature.


Topology optimization Regularization Image processing Morphology operators Manufacturing constraints 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys 194(1):363–393MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrosio L, Buttazzo G (1993) An optimal design problem with perimeter penalization. Calc Var 1:55–69MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendsøe MP (1995) Optimization of structural topology, shape and material. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization—theory, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, XIV+370 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Borel PI, Frandsen LH, Harpøth A, Kristensen M, Jensen JS, Sigmund O (2005) Topology optimised broadband photonic crystal Y-splitter. Electron Lett 41(2):69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borrvall T (2001) Topology optimization of elastic continua using restriction. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8(4):351–385MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Borrvall T, Petersson J (2001) Topology optimization using regularized intermediate density control. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:4911–4928MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdin B (2001) Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(9):2143–2158MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdin B, Chambolle A (2003) Design-dependent loads in topology optimization. ESAIM COCV Abr 9:19–48MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA (2001) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(26-27):3443–3459MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA (2003) An element removal and reintroduction strategy for the topology optimization of structures and compliant mechanisms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57(10):1413–1430MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardoso EL, Fonseca JSO (2003) Complexity control in the topology optimization of continuum structures. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng (3):293–301Google Scholar
  14. Guest J, Prevost J, Belytschko T (2004) Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(2):238–254MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo X, Gu YX (2004) A new density-stiffness interpolation scheme for topology optimization of continuum structures. Eng Comput Int J Comput Aided Eng 21(1):9–22MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haber RB, Jog CS, Bendsøe MP (1994) Variable-topology shape optimization with a constraint on perimeter. In: Gilmore B, et al. (eds) Advances in design automation, vol DE 69-2. ASME, New York, pp 261–272Google Scholar
  17. Jensen JS, Sigmund O (2004) Systematic design of photonic crystal structures using topology optimization: low-loss waveguide bends. Appl Phys Lett 84(12):2022–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen JS, Sigmund O (2005) Topology optimization of photonic crystal structures: a high-bandwidth low-loss T-junction waveguide. J Opt Soc Am B: Opt Phys 22(6):1191–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim YY, Yoon GH (2000) Multi-resolution multi-scale topology optimization—a new paradigm. Int J Solids Struct 37:5529–5559MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Kreisselmeier G, Steinhauser R (1983) Application of vector performance optimization to a robust control loop design for a fighter aircraft. Int J Control 37(2):251–84MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Niordson FI (1983) Optimal design of plates with a constraint on the slope of the thickness function. Int J Solids Struct 19:141–151MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petersson J, Sigmund O (1998) Slope constrained topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 41(8):1417– 1434MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Poulsen TA (2002) Topology optimization in wavelet space. Int J Numer Methods Eng 53:567–582MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Poulsen TA (2003) A new scheme for imposing a minimum length scale in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57(6):741–760MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Pratt WK (1991) Digital image processing. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Sethian JA, Wiegmann A (2000) Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. J Comput Phys 163(2):489–528MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Sigmund O (1994) Design of material structures using topology optimization. PhD thesis, Department of Solid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, the Danish Center for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, DCAMM Special Report No. S69Google Scholar
  28. Sigmund O (1997) On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mechan Struct Mach 25(4):493– 524Google Scholar
  29. Sigmund O (2000) Topology optimization: a tool for the tailoring of structures and materials. Philos Trans R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci 358(1765):211–228MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Sigmund O (2001a) A 99 line topology optimization code written in MATLAB. Struct Multidisc Optim 21:120–127. DOI 10.1007/s001580050176, MATLAB code available online at
  31. Sigmund O (2001b) Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization - Part II: two-material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(49-50):6605–6627. DOI 10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00252-3
  32. Sigmund O, Jensen JS (2003) Systematic design of phononic band gap materials and structures by topology optimization. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 361:1001–1019MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16(1):68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359–373MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang M, Zhou S (2004) Phase field: a variational method for structural topology optimization. Comput Model Eng Sci 6(6):547–566MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang M, Wang X, Guo D (2003) A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(1-2):227–246MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang MY, Wang S (2005) Bilateral filtering for structural topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 63(13):1911–1938MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou M, Shyy YK, Thomas HL (2001) Checkerboard and minimum member size control in topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 21:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Solid MechanicsTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations