A computationally efficient approach to swimming monofin optimization
- 125 Downloads
Monofins provide swimmers with an efficient alternative to the standard pair of fins. For example, all short and long distance human swimming records have been established using monofins. Current monofin design is mostly empirical, so the objectives of this work are to analyze monofin propulsion through coupled fluid–structure simulation and to optimize its flexural stiffness distribution. The optimization process maximizes the propulsive power provided by the monofin with a constraint on the total expended power. To be able to carry out the optimization of the coupled fluid–structure system, which is numerically costly to evaluate, the following simplifications are proposed: (1) a 2-D unsteady, inviscid, and incompressible fluid flow is considered; (2) the swimmer is composed of linear articulated segments, whose kinematics is imposed and identified from experimental data; and (3) the monofin is represented by rigid bars linked by torsional springs. For various allowable swimmer powers, optimal 2-D stiffness distributions are obtained using the Globalized and Bounded Nelder–Mead algorithm. Finally, an identification procedure is described to translate the optimal 2-D stiffness distributions into 3-D thickness profiles for a given monofin planform shape.
KeywordsMonofin design Swimming propulsion Identification Optimization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baly L, Durey A, Favier D (2001) Etude des fréquences et amplitudes ondulatoires chez le nageur avec palmes de haut niveau. Journées de l’Ecole Doctorale des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé, Univ de Méditerranée, France URL http://www.ujf-grenoble.fr/ufraps/acaps/Actes/Poster/baly.pdf
- di Prampero P, Pendergast D, Wilson D, Rennie D (1974) Energetics of swimming in man. J Appl Physiol 37(1):1–5Google Scholar
- Géradin M, Cardona A (2001) Flexible multibody dynamics: a finite element approach. Wiley, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- Kvamsdal T, Jenssen C, Okstad K, Amundsen J (1999) Fluid–structure interaction for structural design. In: Kvamsdal T et al (ed) Proc Int Symp on Comput Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI’99), 15–17 February 1999. Tapir Publishers, Trondheim, Norway pp 211–238Google Scholar
- Lemosse D, Dhatt G (2000) Study of shell-like structures by brick finite element model. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on computational structures technology, Leuven, Belgium, 6–8 September 2000, vol. H, pp 183–190Google Scholar
- Luersen M, Le Riche R, Le Maître O, Breier E (2003) Optimisation de monopalmes de nage. In: Proceedings of the 6th Colloque National en Calcul des Structures, Giens, France, 20–23 May 2003, vol 3, pp 207–214Google Scholar
- Zamparo P, Pendergast D, Termin B, Minetti A (2002) How fins affect the economy and efficiency of human swimming. J Exp Biol 205:2665–2676Google Scholar