Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 113–127 | Cite as

Structural topology optimization using a genetic algorithm with a morphological geometric representation scheme

  • K. Tai
  • S. Akhtar
Research Paper

Abstract

This paper describes a versatile methodology for solving topology design optimization problems using a genetic algorithm (GA). The key to its effectiveness is a geometric representation scheme that works by specifying a skeleton which defines the underlying topology/connectivity of a structural continuum together with segments of material surrounding the skeleton. The required design variables are encoded in a chromosome which is in the form of a directed graph that embodies this underlying topology so that appropriate crossover and mutation operators can be devised to recombine and help preserve any desirable geometry characteristics of the design through succeeding generations in the evolutionary process. The overall methodology is first tested by solving ‘target matching’ problems—simulated topology optimization problems in each of which a ‘target’ geometry is first created and predefined as the optimum solution, and the objective of the optimization problem is to evolve design solutions to converge towards this target shape. The methodology is then applied to design two path-generating compliant mechanisms—large-displacement flexural structures that undergo some desired displacement paths at some point when given a straight line input displacement at some other point—by an actual process of topology/shape optimization.

Keywords

Compliant mechanism Genetic algorithm Morphological representation Target matching Topology optimization  

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akhtar S, Tai K, Prasad J (2002) Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms using evolutionary algorithm with design geometry encoded as a graph. Presented at the 2002 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada, September 29–October 2, 2002, paper no. DETC2002/DAC-34147Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atrek E (1989) SHAPE: A program for shape optimization of continuum structures. In: Brebbia CA, Hernandez S (eds) Computer aided optimum design of structures: applications. Southampton, Computational Mechanics, pp 135–144Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chapman CD, Jakiela MJ (1996) Genetic algorithm-based structural topology design with compliance and topology simplification considerations. ASME J Mech Des 118:89–98Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chapman CD, Saitou K, Jakiela MJ (1994) Genetic algorithms as an approach to configuration and topology design. ASME J Mech Des 116:1005–1012Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cui GY, Tai K, Wang BP (2002) Topology optimization for maximum natural frequency using simulated annealing and morphological representation. AIAA J 40(3):586–589Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frecker MI, Ananthasuresh GK, Nishiwaki S, Kikuchi N, Kota S (1997) Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multi-criteria optimization. ASME J Mech Des 119:238–245Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gross J, Yellen J (1999) Graph theory and its applications. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamda H, Jouve F, Lutton E, Schoenauer M, Sebag M (2002) Compact unstructured representations for evolutionary design. Appl Int 16(2):139–155Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hetrick JA, Kota S (1999) An energy formulation for parametric size and shape optimization of compliant mechanisms. ASME J Mech Des 121:229–234Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howell LL (2001) Compliant mechanisms. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jakiela MJ, Chapman C, Duda J, Adewuya A, Saitou K (2000) Continuum structural topology design with genetic algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 186(2–4):339–356Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kane C, Schoenauer M (1996) Topological optimum design using genetic algorithms. Control Cybern 25(5):1059–1088Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Larsen UD, Sigmund O, Bouwstra S (1997) Design and fabrication of compliant micromechanisms and structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Microelectromech Syst 6:99–106Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu JS, Parks GT, Clarkson PJ (2000) Metamorphic development: a new topology optimization method for continuum structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 20:288–300Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mortenson ME (1997) Geometric modeling, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parsons R, Canfield SL (2002) Developing genetic programming techniques for the design of compliant mechanisms. Struct Multidisc Optim 24:78–86Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pedersen CBW, Buhl T, Sigmund O (2001) Topology synthesis of large-displacement compliant mechanisms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2683–2705Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ray T, Tai K, Seow KC (2001) Multiobjective design optimization by an evolutionary algorithm. Eng Optim 33:399–424Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rozvany GIN (1981) Optimality criteria for grids, shells and arches. in: haug ej, cea J (eds.) Optimization of distributed parameter structures: vol. 1—Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn (the Netherlands), pp 112–151Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rozvany GIN (2001a) Aims, scope, methods, history and unified terminology of computer-aided topology optimization in structural mechanics. Struct Optim 21:90–108Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rozvany GIN (2001b) Stress ratio and compliance based methods in topology optimization—a critical review. Struct Optim 21:109–119Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rozvany GIN, Zhou M, Birker T (1992) Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct Optim 4:250–254Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Russell DM, Manoochehri SP (1989) A two dimensional rule-based shape synthesis method. In: Ravani B (ed.) Advances in design automation, 1989, Vol. 2, Design Optimization. ASME, New York, pp 217–223Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saxena A, Ananthasuresh GK (2001) Topology synthesis of compliant mechanisms for nonlinear force-deflection and curved path specifications. ASME J Mech Des 123:33–42Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schoenauer M (1995) Shape representation for evolutionary optimization and identifcation in structural mechanics. In: Winter G, Periaux J, Galan M, Cuesta P (eds.) Genetic Algorithms in engineering and computer science. Wiley, Chichester, pp 443–464Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sigmund O (1997) On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech Struct Mach 25:493–524Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sigmund O (2001) A 99 line topology optimization code written in MATLAB. Struct Multidisc Optim 21(2):120–127Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soto CA (2001) Structural topology optimization: from minimizing compliance to maximizing energy absorption. Int J Vehicle Des 25(1/2):142–163Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tai K, Chee TH (1998) Genetic algorithm with structural morphology representation for topology design optimization. In: Gentle CR, Hull JB (eds.) Mechanics in design—Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on mechanics in design, Nottingham, pp 827–836Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tai K, Chee TH (2000) Design of structures and compliant mechanisms by evolutionary optimization of morphological representations of topology. ASME J Mech Des 122:560–566Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tai K, Cui GY, Ray T (2002) Design synthesis of path generating compliant mechanisms by evolutionary optimization of topology and shape. ASME J Mech Des 124(3):492–500Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Xie YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49:885–896Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang RJ, Chuang CH (1994) Optimal topology design using linear programming. Comput Struct 52:265–275Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Numerical Engineering Simulations, School of Mechanical and Production EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations