Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 25, Issue 5–6, pp 436–445 | Cite as

Optimization of practical trusses with constraints on eigenfrequencies, displacements, stresses, and buckling

  • N.L. Pedersen
  • A.K. Nielsen
Research paper


In this paper we consider the optimization of general 3D truss structures. The design variables are the cross-sections of the truss bars together with the joint coordinates, and are considered to be continuous variables. Using these design variables we simultaneously carry out size optimization (areas) and shape optimization (joint positions). Topology optimization (removal and introduction of bars) is only considered in the sense that bars of minimum cross-sectional area will have a negligible influence on the performance of the structure. The structures are subjected to multiple load cases and the objective of the optimizations is minimum mass with constraints on (possibly multiple) eigenfrequencies, displacements, and stresses. For the case of stress constraints, we deal differently with tensile and compressive stresses, for which we control buckling on the element level. The stress constraints are imposed in correlation with industrial standards, to make the optimized designs valuable from a practical point of view. The optimization problem is solved using SLP (Sequential Linear Programming).


truss optimization eigenfrequencies displacement stress buckling multiple loads  


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bathe, K.J. 1996: Finite element Procedures, 2nd edn., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bendsøe, M.P.; Ben-Tal, A.; Zowe, J. 1994: Optimization methods for truss geometry and topology design. Struct. Optim. 7, 141–159 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dorn, W.; Gomery, R.; Greenberg, M. 1964: Automatic design of optimal structures. J. Mec. 3, 25–52 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DS409 1998: Code of practice for the safety of structures, Danish standard Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DS410 1998: Code of practice for loads for the design of structures, Danish standard Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DS412 1998: Code of practice for the structural use of steel, Danish standard Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleron, P. 1964: The minimum weight of trusses. Bygningsstatiske Meddelser 35, 81–96 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gil, L.; Andreu, A. (2001): Shape and cross-section optimization of a truss structure. Comput. Struct. 79, 681–689 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haftka, R.T.; Gürdal, Z.; Kamat, M.P. 1990: Elements of structural optimization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Math/Library 1991: User’s Manual, IMSL Inc., 2500 CityWest Boulevard, Houston TX 77042 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nielsen, A.K. (2001): Tredimensionale gitterkonstruktioner: optimering for minimum mass med restriktioner på dynamiske og statiske egenskaber. Technical report, Department of Solid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark. Masters Thesis (in Danish) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pedersen, N.L. (2000): Maximization of eigenvalues using topology optimization. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 20, 2–11 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pedersen, P. 1969: On the minimum mass layout of trusses. In: AGARD Symposium on Structural Optimization (NATO, held in Instanbul), 36, pp. 11–1–17 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pedersen, P. 1973: Optimal joint position for space trusses. J. Struct. Div. ASCE 99(ST12), 2459–2476 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pedersen, P. 1982–83: Design with several eigenvalue constraints by finite elements and linear programming. J. Struct. Mech. 10, 243–271 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pedersen, P. 1993: Topology optimization of three-dimensional trusses. In: Bendsøe, M.; Mota-Soares, C.A. (eds.) Topology design of structures (NATO ASI held in Sesimbra, Portugal 1992), Vol. 227, pp. 19–30. Leuven: Kluwer Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pedersen, P. 1994: Non-conservative dynamic systems: Analysis, sensitivity analysis, optimization. In: Olhoff, N. (ed.) Concurrent engineering tools for dynamic analysis and optimization, 2. Aalborg University Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pedersen, P.; Jørgensen, L. 1984: Minimum mass design of elastic frames subjected to multiple load cases. Comput. Struct. 18, 147–157 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rozvany, G.I.N.; Bendsøe, M.P.; Kirsch, U. 1995: Layout optimization of structures. Appl. Mech. Rev 48, 41–119 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seyranian, A.P.; Lund, E.; Olhoff, N. 1994: Multiple eigenvalues in optimization problems. Struct. Optim. 8, 207–226Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Solid MechanicsTechnical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations