Archive for Mathematical Logic

, Volume 46, Issue 7–8, pp 649–664 | Cite as

Embedding FD(ω) into \({\mathcal{P}_s}\) densely

Article

Abstract

Let \({\mathcal{P}_s}\) be the lattice of degrees of non-empty \({\Pi_1^0}\) subsets of 2 ω under Medvedev reducibility. Binns and Simpson proved that FD(ω), the free distributive lattice on countably many generators, is lattice-embeddable below any non-zero element in \({\mathcal{P}_s}\) . Cenzer and Hinman proved that \({\mathcal{P}_s}\) is dense, by adapting the Sacks Preservation and Sacks Coding Strategies used in the proof of the density of the c.e. Turing degrees. With a construction that is a modification of the one by Cenzer and Hinman, we improve on the result of Binns and Simpson by showing that for any \({\mathcal{U} < _s \mathcal{V}}\) , we can lattice embed FD(ω) into \({\mathcal{P}_s}\) strictly between \({deg_s(\mathcal{U})}\) and \({deg_s({\mathcal V})}\) . We also note that, in contrast to the infinite injury in the proof of the Sacks Density Theorem, in our proof all injury is finite, and that this is also true for the proof of Cenzer and Hinman, if a straightforward simplification is made.

Keywords

Expansionary Stage Mass Problem Turing Degree Negative Strategy Positive Requirement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alfeld, C.P.: Non-branching degrees in the Medvedev lattice of \({\Pi_1^0}\) classes. J. Symbol. Logic 72, 81–97 (2007)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binns, S.E.: A splitting theorem for the Medvedev and Muchnik lattices. Math. Logic Q. 49, 327–335 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Binns, S.E., Simpson, S.G.: Embeddings into the Medvedev and Muchnik lattices of \({\Pi_1^0}\) classes. Arch. Math. Logic 43, 399–414 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cenzer, D., Hinman, P.G.: Density of the Medvedev lattice of \({\Pi_1^0}\) classes. Arch. Math. Logic 42, 583–600 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grätzer, G.A.: General Lattice Theory. 2nd edn. Birkhäuser-Verlag, XIII + 381 (1978)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simpson, S.G.: Mass problems and randomness. Bull. Symbol. Logic 11, 1–27 (2005)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simpson, S.G.: An extension of the recursively enumerable turing degrees. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 75, 287–297 (2007)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simpson, S.G.: Mass problems and almost everywhere domination. Math. Logic Q. 53, 483–492 (2007)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simpson, S.G., Theodore, A.: Slaman. Medvedev degrees of \({\Pi^0_1}\) subsets of 2ω. Preprint, 4 pages, (2001, in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soare, R.I.: Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer, Heidelberg, XVIII + 437 pages (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations