In theory, people who own real estate should have advantage finding a partner in the marriage market. Empirical analyses along this line, however, face three issues. First, it is difficult to identify any causality for whether housing facilitates marriage or expected marriage facilitates a housing purchase. Second, survey samples usually do not cover very wealthy people, and so the observations are top coding in the wealth dimension. Third, getting married is a dynamic life cycle decision, and rich life-history data are rarely available. This paper uses registry data from Taiwan to estimate the impact of males’ housing wealth on their first-marriage duration, taking into account all three issues mentioned above. We find that a 10% increase in real estate wealth increases probability of a man getting married in any particular year by 3.92%. Our finding suggests that housing or real estate is a status good in the marriage market.
Marriage formation Housing wealth Status good Duration model
C25 J12 R21
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Ruoh-Rong Yu and Hao-Chun Cheng for their participation in the early stage of this project. We also thank Chien-Yu Chen and Chun-Hung Tsang for the research assistance. We are grateful for the valuable comments of two anonymous referees and the suggestions of the Editor and Co-Managing Editor of the Journal of Population Economics. An earlier version of this paper was presented at Oxford University, Paris School of Economics, and Academia Sinica, where useful comments and suggestions by John Ermisch, Thomas Piketty, and many seminar participants were greatly appreciated.
Albouy D, Zabek M (2016) Housing inequality. NBER Working Paper 21916Google Scholar
Bowmaker SW, Emerson PM (2015) Bricks, mortar, and wedding bells: does the cost of housing affect the marriage rate in the US? East Econ J 41:411–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess S, Propper C, Aassve A (2003) The role of income in marriage and divorce transitions among young Americans. J Popul Econ 16:455–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu CC, Yu R-R (2010) Understanding Chinese families: a comparative study of Taiwan and Southeast China. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Das Gupta M, Jiang Z, Li B, Xie Z, Chung W, Bae H (2010) Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Ssia? A cross-country study of china, India and the Republic Of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies 40:153–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dew J, Price J (2011) Beyond employment and income: the association between young adults’ finances and marital timing. J Fam Econ Iss 32:424–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank RH (2007) Falling behind: how rising inequality hurts the middle class? University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Davis CM (2009) Money, marriage, and children: testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. J Marriage Fam 71:146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier KB, Hicks DL, Yuan W (2016) Marriage market matching and conspicuous consumption in China. Econ Inq 54:1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings EA, Axinn WG, Ghimire DJ (2012) The effect of parents’ attitudes on sons’ marriage timing. Am Sociol Rev 77:923–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laeven L, Popov A (2017) Waking up from the american dream: on the experience of young americans during the housing boom of the 2000s. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 49:861–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin I-F, Goldman M, Weinstein Y-H, Lin T, Gorrindo TS (2003) Gender differences in adult children’s support of their parents in Taiwan. J Marriage Fam 65:184–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh A (2011) Social status and the demand for housing. Working Paper. University of BristolGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer VK (2003) Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography 40:127–149Google Scholar
Oppenheimer VK, Kalmijn M, Lim N (1997) Men’s career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography 34:311–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papke L, Wooldridge JM (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. J Econ 145:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers D, Vuong Q (1988) Limited information estimators and exogenous test for simultaneous probit models. J Econ 39:347–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar