Males’ housing wealth and their marriage market advantage

  • C. Y. Cyrus Chu
  • Jou-Chun Lin
  • Wen-Jen TsayEmail author
Original Paper


In theory, people who own real estate should have advantage finding a partner in the marriage market. Empirical analyses along this line, however, face three issues. First, it is difficult to identify any causality for whether housing facilitates marriage or expected marriage facilitates a housing purchase. Second, survey samples usually do not cover very wealthy people, and so the observations are top coding in the wealth dimension. Third, getting married is a dynamic life cycle decision, and rich life-history data are rarely available. This paper uses registry data from Taiwan to estimate the impact of males’ housing wealth on their first-marriage duration, taking into account all three issues mentioned above. We find that a 10% increase in real estate wealth increases probability of a man getting married in any particular year by 3.92%. Our finding suggests that housing or real estate is a status good in the marriage market.


Marriage formation Housing wealth Status good Duration model 

JEL Classification

C25 J12 R21 



We thank Ruoh-Rong Yu and Hao-Chun Cheng for their participation in the early stage of this project. We also thank Chien-Yu Chen and Chun-Hung Tsang for the research assistance. We are grateful for the valuable comments of two anonymous referees and the suggestions of the Editor and Co-Managing Editor of the Journal of Population Economics. An earlier version of this paper was presented at Oxford University, Paris School of Economics, and Academia Sinica, where useful comments and suggestions by John Ermisch, Thomas Piketty, and many seminar participants were greatly appreciated.


  1. Albouy D, Zabek M (2016) Housing inequality. NBER Working Paper 21916Google Scholar
  2. Bowmaker SW, Emerson PM (2015) Bricks, mortar, and wedding bells: does the cost of housing affect the marriage rate in the US? East Econ J 41:411–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgess S, Propper C, Aassve A (2003) The role of income in marriage and divorce transitions among young Americans. J Popul Econ 16:455–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu CC, Yu R-R (2010) Understanding Chinese families: a comparative study of Taiwan and Southeast China. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Das Gupta M, Jiang Z, Li B, Xie Z, Chung W, Bae H (2010) Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Ssia? A cross-country study of china, India and the Republic Of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies 40:153–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dew J, Price J (2011) Beyond employment and income: the association between young adults’ finances and marital timing. J Fam Econ Iss 32:424–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frank RH (2007) Falling behind: how rising inequality hurts the middle class? University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibson-Davis CM (2009) Money, marriage, and children: testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. J Marriage Fam 71:146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grier KB, Hicks DL, Yuan W (2016) Marriage market matching and conspicuous consumption in China. Econ Inq 54:1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jennings EA, Axinn WG, Ghimire DJ (2012) The effect of parents’ attitudes on sons’ marriage timing. Am Sociol Rev 77:923–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laeven L, Popov A (2017) Waking up from the american dream: on the experience of young americans during the housing boom of the 2000s. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 49:861–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lin I-F, Goldman M, Weinstein Y-H, Lin T, Gorrindo TS (2003) Gender differences in adult children’s support of their parents in Taiwan. J Marriage Fam 65:184–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marsh A (2011) Social status and the demand for housing. Working Paper. University of BristolGoogle Scholar
  14. Oppenheimer VK (2003) Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography 40:127–149Google Scholar
  15. Oppenheimer VK, Kalmijn M, Lim N (1997) Men’s career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography 34:311–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Papke L, Wooldridge JM (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. J Econ 145:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rivers D, Vuong Q (1988) Limited information estimators and exogenous test for simultaneous probit models. J Econ 39:347–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schneider D (2011) Wealth and the marital divide. Am J Sociol 117:627–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. South SJ (2001) The variable effects of family background on the timing of first marriage: United States, 1969-1993. Soc Sci Res 30:606–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wei S-J, Zhang X, Liu Y (2017) Home ownership as status competition: some theory and evidence. J Dev Econ 127:169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Wrenn DH, Klaiber HA, Newburn DA (2017) Confronting price endogeneity in a duration model of residential subdivision development. J Appl Econom 32:661–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xie Y, Raymo JM, Goyette K, Thornton A (2003) Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography 40:351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yu J, Xie Y (2015) Changes in the determinants of marriage entry in post-reform urban China. Demography 52:1869–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yu WH, Su KH, Chiu CT (2012) Sibship characteristics and transition to first marriage in Taiwan: explaining gender asymmetries. Popul Res Policy Rev 31:609–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Institute of EconomicsAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations