Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 247–275 | Cite as

Living arrangement and caregiving expectation: the effect of residential proximity on inter vivos transfer

  • Chien-Hao FuEmail author
Original Paper


Informal care by adult children provides important support for frail seniors, yet it is unclear whether this costly service is balanced by parents’ financial transfers. This paper examines how family living arrangements affect parents’ relationship with their children. Specifically, it investigates whether a child’s residence affect parents’ decision in making financial gifts, and whether this relationship is based on their expectation to receive care in the future. Results show that children in closer proximity are more likely to receive transfers from their parents on both the intensive and extensive margins. A closer examination of the effects reveals that the difference can be at least partially explained by the increased likelihood of care provision when a child is living in closer proximity. The findings suggest that today’s residential location could be a signal in indicating a child’s prospect of providing care and thus affects parents’ decision in making financial gifts. It also reaffirms the interdependency between caregiving and residential decisions and calls attention to its roles in shaping intergenerational relationship.


Informal care Long-term care Inter vivos transfer Intergenerational transfer Family exchange 

JEL Classification

I13 I38 J14 



I would like to express my immense gratitude to Professor Emeritus Neil Bruce, Professor Emeritus Robert D. Plotnick, Professor Jennifer Romich, and Professor Rachel Heath for their guidance during the course of the research. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for sharing their insights on the manuscript and the audiences at several conferences for their comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.


  1. Altonji J G, Hayashi F, Kotlikoff L (2000) The effects of income and wealth on time and money transfers between parents and children. In: Mason A, Tapinos GP (eds) Sharing the wealth: demographic change and economic transfers between generations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 306–357Google Scholar
  2. Arno PS, Levine C, Memmott MM (1999) The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Affairs 18(2):182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrondel L, Masson A (2006) Altruism, exchange or indirect reciprocity: what do the data on family transfers show? In: Serge-Christophe YJ (ed) Handbook on the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism, chap 14. ISBN: 1574-0714, vol 2. Elsevier, pp 971–1053Google Scholar
  4. Barro RJ (1974) Are government bonds net wealth? J Polit Econ 82(6):1095–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS (1974) A theory of social interactions. J Polit Econ 82(6):1063–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belot M, Ermisch J (2009) Friendship ties and geographical mobility: evidence from Great Britain. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 172(2):427–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernheim BD, Shleifer A, Summers LH (1985) The strategic bequest motive. J Polit Econ 93(6):1045–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boaz RF, Hu J, Ye Y (1999) The Transfer of resources from middle-aged children to functionally limited elderly parents: providing time, giving money, sharing space. Gerontologist 39(6):648–657. ISSN: 0016-9013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonsang E (2009) Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? J Health Econ 28(1):143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown M (2006) Informal care and the division of end-of-life transfers. J Hum Resour 41(1):191–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox D (1987) Motives for private income transfers. J Polit Econ 95(3):508–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cremer H, Roeder K (2017) Rotten spouses, family transfers, and public goods. J Popul Econ 30(1):141–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunn TA, Phillips JW (1997) Do parents divide resources equally among children? Evidence from the AHEAD Survey. Tech. rep. 5Google Scholar
  14. Ettner SL (1996) The opportunity costs of elder care. J Hum Resour 31 (1):189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henretta JC, Hill MS, Li W, Soldo BJ, Wolf DA (1997) Selection of children to provide care: the effect of earlier parental transfers. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 52B(Special):110–119. issn: 1079-5014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HRS (2014) Health and Retirement Study, public use dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  17. Hurd MD (2003) Leaving bequests: by accident or by design? Death and dollars. The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 93–118Google Scholar
  18. Klimaviciute J, Perelman S, Pestieau P, Schoenmaeckers J (2017) Caring for dependent parents: altruism, exchange or family norm?. J Popul Econ 30 (3):835–873. ISSN: 1432-1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Konrad KA, Künemund H, Lommerud KE, Robledo JR (2002) Geography of the family. Am Econ Rev 92(4):981–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laferrère A, Wolff FC (2006) Chapter 13 microeconomic models of family transfers. In: Serge-Christophe K, Mercier YJ (eds) Handbook on the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism. 1574-0714. Elsevier, pp 889–969Google Scholar
  21. Laitner JP, Sonnega A (2012) Motives for bequests within the middle class. Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper No. 2012-275. ISSN: 1556-5068Google Scholar
  22. Latif E (2006) Labour supply effects of informal caregiving in Canada. Can Public Policy/Anal Politiques 32(4):413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee RD (1994) Population age structure, intergenerational transfer, and wealth: a new approach, with applications to the United States. J Hum Resour 29(4):1027–1063. ISSN: 0022166XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McDonald JF, Moffitt RA (1980) The uses of tobit analysis. Rev Econ Stat 62(2):318–321. ISSN: 00346535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGarry K (1998) Caring for the elderly: the role of adult children. In: Wise DA (ed) Inquiries in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 463–485Google Scholar
  26. McGarry K, Schoeni RF (1995) Transfer behavior in the health and retirement study: measurement and the redistribution of resources within the family. J Hum Resour 30:S184–S226. ISSN: 0022166XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGarry K, Schoeni RF (1997) Transfer behavior within the family: results from the asset and health dynamics study. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 52B (Special Issue):82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGinnis R (1968) A stochastic model of social mobility. Am Sociol Rev 33 (5):712–722. ISSN: 00031224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Alliance for Caregiving (2009) Caregiving in the U.S. Tech. rep. BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  30. Norton EC, Van Houtven CH (2006) Inter-vivos transfers and exchange. South Econ J 73(1):157–172. ISSN: 00384038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norton EC, Nicholas LH, Huang SSH (2013) Informal care and inter-vivos transfers: results from the national longitudinal survey of mature women. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 18948Google Scholar
  32. Pezzin LE, Pollak RA, Schone BS (2007) Efficiency in family bargaining: living arrangements and caregiving decisions of adult children and disabled elderly parents. CESifo Econ Stud 53(1):69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. RAND (2014) RAND HRS data, version N; RAND HRS family data files, version C. Produced by the RAND Center for the Study of Aging, with funding from the National Institute on Aging and the Social Security Administration. Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  34. Spillman BC, Pezzin LE (2000) Potential and active family caregivers: changing networks and the “sandwich generation”. Milbank Q 78(3):347–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Szinovacz ME, Davey A (2007) Division of care among adult children. In: Szinovacz M E, Davey A (eds) Caregiving contexts: cultural, familial, and societal implications. Springer, New York, pp 133–159Google Scholar
  36. Szinovacz ME, Davey A (2008) The division of parent care between spouses. Ageing Soc 28(4):571–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Terza JV, Basu A, Rathouz PJ (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. J Health Econ 27(3):531–43. ISSN: 0167-6296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Houtven CH, Norton EC (2004) Informal care and health care use of older adults. J Health Econ 23(6):1159–1180. ISSN: 0167-6296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Houtven C, Coe NB, Skira M (2010) Effect of informal care on work, wages, and wealthGoogle Scholar
  40. Victorio AG, Arnott RJ (1993) Wealth, bequests and attention. Econ Lett 42(2–3):149–154. ISSN 01651765CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Finance, National Taipei UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations