Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 911–936 | Cite as

Strategic parenting, birth order, and school performance

  • V. Joseph Hotz
  • Juan Pantano
Original Paper

Abstract

Fueled by new evidence, there has been renewed interest about the effects of birth order on human capital accumulation. The underlying causal mechanisms for such effects remain unsettled. We consider a model in which parents impose more stringent disciplinary environments in response to their earlier-born children’s poor performance in school in order to deter such outcomes for their later-born offspring. We provide robust empirical evidence that school performance of children in the National Longitudinal Study Children (NLSY-C) declines with birth order as does the stringency of their parents’ disciplinary restrictions. When asked how they will respond if a child brought home bad grades, parents state that they would be less likely to punish their later-born children. Taken together, these patterns are consistent with a reputation model of strategic parenting.

Keywords

Birth order School performance Grades Parenting Parental rules 

JEL Classifications

I20 J10 J13 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Dan Ackerberg; Sandy Black; Leah Boustan; Moshe Buchinsky; Dora Costa; Harold Demsetz; Paul Devereux; Donna Ginther; Bart Hamilton; Guillermo Ordonez; Bob Pollak; John Riley; Joe Rodgers; Kjell Salvanes; Judith Seltzer; Bruce Weinberg; seminar participants at UCLA, Washington University in St. Louis, Duke University, New York University, University of Pennsylvania, OECD, and Clemson University; comments from discussants at the 2008 PAA meetings and 2008 SOLE meetings; and from respondents to the Colin Clark Lecture delivered by one of us (Hotz) at the 2011 Econometric Society Australasian Meeting. We also thank two anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions. All errors remain ours.

Supplementary material

148_2015_542_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (131 kb)
(PDF 131 KB)

References

  1. Behrman J, Taubman P (1986) Birth order, schooling and earnings. J Labor Econ 4(3):S121–S145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjerkedal T, Kristensen P, Skejeret G, Brevik JI (2007) Intelligence test scores and birth order among young Norwegian men (conscripts) analyzed within and between families. Intelligence 35(6):503–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black S, Devereux P, Salvanes K (2005) The more the merrier? The effect of family size and birth order on children’s education. Q J Econ 120(2):669–700Google Scholar
  4. Black S, Devereux P, Salvanes K (2007) Older and wiser?: birth order and IQ of young men. NBER working paper 13237Google Scholar
  5. Blake J (1981) Family size and the quality of children. Demogr 18(4):421–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth AL, Kee HJ (2009) Birth order matters: the effect of family size and birth order on educational attainment. J Popul Econ 22(2):367–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conley D, Glauber R (2006) Parental education investment and children’s academic risk: estimates of the impact of sibship size and birth order from exogenous variation in fertility. J Hum Resour 41(4):722–37Google Scholar
  8. Covington M (2000) Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: an integrative review. Annu Rev Psychol 51:171–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Fraja G, D’Oliveira T, Zanchi L (2010) Must try harder. Evaluating the role of effort on examination results. Rev Econ Stat 92(3):577–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ermisch JF, Francesconi M (2001) Family structure and children’s achievements. J Popul Econ 14(2):249–270Google Scholar
  11. Fan X, Chen M (2001) Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educ Psychol Rev 13:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finlay K, Neumark D (2010) Is marriage always good for children? Evidence from families affected by incarceration. J Hum Resour 45(4):1046–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gary-Bobo R, Prieto A, Picard N (2006) Birth-order and sibship sex composition effects in the study of education and earnings. Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 5514Google Scholar
  14. Gerner J, Lillard D (2006) The effect of birth order on early educational attainment.” Cornell University. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  15. Ginther D, Pollak R (2004) Family structure and children’s educational outcomes: blended families, stylized facts and descriptive regressions. Demogr 41(4):671–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hao L, Hotz VJ, Jin GZ (2008) Games that parents and adolescents play: risky behavior, parental reputation and strategic transfers. Econ J 118(528):515–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hauser RM, Sewell WH (1985) Birth order and educational attainment in full sibships. Am Educ Res J 22(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoover-Dempsey KV, Battiato AC, Walker JMT, Reed RP, De-Jong JM, Jones KP (2001) Parental involvement in homework. Educ Psychol 36:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kessler D (1991) Birth order, family size and achievement: family structure and wage determination. J Labor Econ 9(4):413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanazawa S (2012) Intelligence, birth order and family size. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 38:1157–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kreps D, Wilson R (1982) Reputation and imperfect information. J Econ Theory 27:253–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehmann J-YK, Nuevo-Chiquero A, Vidal-Fernandez M (2013) Birth order differences in early inputs and outcomes. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6755Google Scholar
  23. Lindert P (1977) Sibling position and achievement. J Hum Resour 12(2):220–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLanahan S, Sandefur G (1994) Growing up with a single parent: what hurts, what helps. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Milgrom P, Roberts J (1982) Predation, reputation and entry deterrence. J Econ Theory 27:280–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Natriello G, McDill E (1986) Performance standards, student effort on homework, and academic achievement. Sociol Educ 59(1):18–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olneck MR, Bills DB (1979) Family configuration and achievement: effects of birth order and family size in a sample of Brothers. Soc Psychol Rev 42(2):135–148Google Scholar
  28. Pavan R (2013) On the production of skills and the birth order effect, working paper. University of London, Royal HollowayGoogle Scholar
  29. Price J (2008) Parent-child quality time: does birth order matter? J Hum Resour 43(1):240–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodgers JL, Cleveland HH, van den Oord E, Rowe DC (2000) Resolving the debate over birth order, family size and intelligence. Am Psychol 55(6):599–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodgers JL, Cleveland HH, van den Oord E, Rowe DC (2001) Birth order and intelligence: together again for the last time? Am Psychol 56(6–7):523–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Selten R (1978) The chain store paradox. Theor Decis 9:127–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stinebrickner R, Stinebrickner T (2008) The Causal Effect of Studying on Academic Performance. BE J Econ Anal Poli 8(1). (Frontiers) Article 14Google Scholar
  34. Tartari M (2014) Divorce and the cognitive achievement of children. working paper, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Trautwein U, Koller O (2003) The relationship between homework and achievement: still much of a mystery. Educ Psychol Rev 15:115–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whichman AL, Rodgers JL, McCallum RC (2006) A multi-level approach to the relationship between birth order and intelligence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32(1):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Whichman AL, Rodgers JL, McCallum RC (2007) Birth order has no effect on intelligence: a reply and extension of previous findings. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33(9):1195–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolters C (1999) The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learn Individ Differ 11(3):281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zajonc RB (1976) Family configuration and intelligence. Science 192:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zajonc RB, Sulloway FJ (2007) The confluence model: birth order as a between family or within family dynamic? Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33:1187–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsDuke University, IZA & NBERDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations