Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 1045–1073 | Cite as

Unexplored dimensions of discrimination in Europe: homosexuality and physical appearance

Original Paper

Abstract

We study labor-market discrimination of individuals with “specific” characteristics in Italy. We conduct a field experiment in two Italian cities: Rome and Milan, by sending “fake” CVs to real ads. We find that there is a strong penalty for homosexuals, i.e., about 30 % less chance to be called back compared to a heterosexual male and even more so if they are highly skilled. On the other hand, we find no penalty for homosexual females. We also find a beauty premium for females only but this premium is much lower when the “pretty” woman is skilled.

Keywords

Discrimination Gays Lesbians Field experiment 

JEL Classifications

I10 J16 J71 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor, Erdal Tekin, two anonymous referees as well as Tito Boeri, Alan Manning, and Jan van Ours for the very helpful comments. We are also grateful to Barbara Biasi, Paola Monti, and Rachele Poggi for excellent research assistance. We thank the Fondazione Rodolfo DeBenedetti for financial support.

References

  1. Adam B (1981) Stigma and employability: discrimination by sex and sexual orientation in the Ontario legal profession. Can Rev Sociol Antropology 18:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed AM, Andersson L, Hammarstedt M (2010a) Can discrimination in the housing market be reduced by increasing the information about the applicants? Land Econ 86:79–90Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed AM, Hammarstedt M (2010b) Sexual orientation and earnings: a register data-based approach to identify homosexuals. J Popul Econ 23:835–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed AM, Andersson L, Hammarstedt M (2011) Inter- and intra-household earnings differentials among homosexual and heterosexual couples. Br J Ind Relat 49:258–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmed A, Andersson L, Hammarstedt M (2013) Are gay men and lesbians discriminated against in the hiring situation? South Econ J 79:565–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmed AM, Hammarstedt M (2009) Detecting discrimination against homosexuals: evidence from a field experiment on the internet. Economica 76:588–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aigner DJ, Cain G (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Ind Labor Relat Rev 30:749–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Allasino E, Reyneri E, Venturini A, Zincone G (2004) Labour market discrimination against migrant workers in Italy. International Migrations Paper 67. International Labour Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. Altonji JG, Blank RM (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3. Amsterdam, North Holland, pp 3143–3259Google Scholar
  10. Altonji JG, Pierret CR (2001) Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Q J Econ 116:313–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arrow KJ (1973) The theory of discrimination. In: Ashenfelter O, Rees A (eds) Discrimination in labor markets. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 3–33Google Scholar
  12. Ayres I, Siegelman P (1995) Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. Amer Econ Rev 85:304–321Google Scholar
  13. Badgett MV (2001) Money, myths, and change: the economic lives of lesbians and gay men. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker G (1957) The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Becker G (1981) Treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor discrimination. Amer Econ Rev 94:991–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Biddle J, Hamermesh D (1994) Beauty and the labor market. Amer Econ Rev 84:174–194Google Scholar
  18. Black DA, Sanders S, Taylor L (2007) The economics of lesbian and gay families. J Econ Perspect 21:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boeri T, van Ours J (2013) The economics of imperfect labor markets. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. Cameron AC, Miller DL (2014) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J Human Resour. forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  21. Capozzi P, Lingiardi V (2003) Happy Italy? The Mediterranean experience of homosexuality, psychoanalysis, and the mental health professions. J Gay Lesbian Psychother 7:93–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coate S, Loury GC (1993) Will affirmative-action policies eliminate negative stereotypes Amer Econ Rev 83:1220–1240Google Scholar
  23. Cornell B, Welch I (1996) Culture, information and screening discrimination. J Polit Econ 104:542–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Drydakis N (2009) Sexual orientation discrimination in the labour market. Labour Econ 16:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drydakis N (2011) Women’s sexual orientation and labor market outcomes in Greece. Fem Econ 17:89–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elmslie B, Tebaldi E (2007) Sexual orientation and labor market discrimination. J Labor Res 28:436–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fletcher J (2009) Beauty vs. brains: early labor market outcomes of high school graduates. Econ Lett 105:321–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fink B, Neave N, Seydel H (2007) Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. Am J Human Biol 19:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Galster GC (1990) Neighborhood racial change, segregationist sentiments, and affirmative marketing policies. J Urban Econ 27:344–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerhards J (2010) Non-discrimination towards homosexuality: the European Union’s policy and citizens’ attitudes towards homosexuality in 27 European countries. Int Sociol 25:5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamermesh D (2011) Beauty pays. Why attractive people are more successful? Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  32. Harper B (2000) Beauty, stature, and the labour market: a British cohort study. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 62:771–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hebl M, Foster JM, Mannix LM, Dovidio JF (2002) Formal and interpersonal discrimination: a field study bias toward homosexual applicants. Personal Social Psychol Bull 28:815–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heilman ME, Saruwatari LR (1979) When beauty is beastly: the effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and non-managerial jobs. Organ Behav Human Perform 23:360–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Herek GM (2000) Sexual prejudice and gender: do heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbian and gay men differ? J Soc Issues 56:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herek GM, Capitanio JP (1996) Some of my best friends: intergroup contact, concealable stigma and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personal Social Psychol Bull 22:412–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahn LM (1991) Discrimination in professional sports: a survey of the literature. Ind Labor Relat Rev 44:395–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kite ME, Whitley BE (1996) Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: a meta-analysis. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 22:336–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knowles J, Persico N, Todd P (2001) Racial bias in motor vehicle searches: theory and evidence. J Polit Econ 109:203–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kofi Charles K, Guryan J (2011) Studying discrimination: fundamental challenges and recent progress. Ann Rev Econ 3:479–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuran T, McCaffery EJ (2004) Expanding discrimination research: beyond ethnicity and to the web. Soc Sci Q 85:713–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lang K, Lehmann J-YK (2012) Racial discrimination in the labor market: theory and empirics. J Econ Lit 50:959–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levitt SD (2004) Testing theories of discrimination: evidence from the weakest link. J Law Econ 47:431–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lingiardi V, Capozzi P (2004) Psychoanalytic attitudes toward homosexuality: an empirical research. Int J Psychoanal 85:137–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lingiardi V, Drescher J (2003) Mental health professions and homosexuality: international perspectives. Haworth Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Lingiardi V, Falanga S, DAugelli AR (2005) The evaluation of homophobia in an Italian sample. Arch Sexual Behav 34:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. List JA (2004) The nature and extent of discrimination in the marketplace: evidence from the field. Q J Econ 119:49–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. López Bóo F, Rossi MA, Urzúa S (2013) The labor market return to an attractive face: evidence from a field experiment. Economics Letters 118:170–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lundberg SJ, Startz R (1983) Private discrimination and social intervention in competitive labor markets. Am Econ Rev 73:340–347Google Scholar
  50. Mobius M, Rosenblat T (2006) Why beauty matters. Am Econ Rev 96:222–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neumark D (1996) Sex discrimination in hiring in the restaurant industry: an audit study. Q J Econ 111:915–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peplau LA, Fingerhut A (2004) The paradox of the lesbian worker. J Soc Issues 60:719–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Phelps E (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Am Econ Rev 62:659–661Google Scholar
  54. Riach P, Rich J (2002) Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Econ J 112:480–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruffle BJ, Shtudiner Z (2010) Are good-looking people more employable? Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Discussion Paper No:10–06Google Scholar
  56. Weichselbaumer D (2003) Sexual orientation discrimination and hiring. Labour Econ 10:629–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weichselbaumer D (2013) Testing for discrimination against lesbians of different marital status: a field experiment, Working Paper No 1308. Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University of LinzGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang A (1997) Trends: attitudes toward homosexuality. Publ Opin Q 61:477–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleonora Patacchini
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Ragusa
    • 2
  • Yves Zenou
    • 3
  1. 1.Cornell University, EIEF and CEPRIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Luiss UniversityRomeItaly
  3. 3.Stockholm University, IFN and CEPRStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations