Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1039–1086 | Cite as

Muslims in France: identifying a discriminatory equilibrium

  • Claire L. Adida
  • David D. Laitin
  • Marie-Anne Valfort
Original Paper

Abstract

We analyze the assimilation patterns of Muslim immigrants in Western countries with a unique identification strategy. Survey and experimental data collected in France in 2009 suggest that Muslims and rooted French are locked in a suboptimal equilibrium whereby (i) rooted French exhibit taste-based discrimination against those they are able to identify as Muslims and (ii) Muslims perceive French institutions as systematically discriminatory against them. This equilibrium is sustained because Muslims, perceiving discrimination as institutionalized, are reluctant to assimilate and rooted French, who are able to identify Muslims as such due to their lower assimilation, reveal their distaste for Muslims.

Keywords

Assimilation Muslim and Christian immigrants Discrimination France 

Supplementary material

148_2014_512_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
(PDF 1.14 MB)

References

  1. Adida CL, Laitin DD, Valfort M-A (2010) Identifying barriers to Muslim integration in France. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(52):384–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adida CL, Laitin DD, Valfort M-A (2014) Gender norms, Muslim immigrants, and economic integration in France. Econ Polit 26(1):79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adida CL, Laitin DD, Valfort M-A (2012) One Muslim is enough! Evidence from a field experiment in France. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  4. Adida CL, Laitin DD, Valfort M-A (2013) Region of origin or religion? Understanding why immigrants from Muslim-majority countries are discriminated against in Western Europe. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  5. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Q J Econ 115(3):715–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aleksynska M (2011) Civic participation of immigrants in Europe: assimilation, origin, and destination country effects. Eur J Polit Econ 27(3):566–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Algan Y, Hémet C, Laitin DD (2012) Diversity and local public goods: a natural experiment with exogenous residential allocation. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  8. Allport G (1954) The nature of prejudice. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Arrow KJ (1972) Some mathematical models of race discrimination in the labor market. In: Pascal A H (ed) Racial discrimination in economic life. D.C. Heath, Lexington, pp 187–204Google Scholar
  10. Arrow KJ (1998) What has economics to say about racial discrimination.J Econ Perspect 12(2):91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Asante MK (2009) Serer. In: Asante MK, Mazama A (eds) Encyclopedia of African religion. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  12. Ashraf N, Bohnet I, Piankov N (2006) Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Exp Econ 9(3):193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Austen-Smith D, Fryer RG (2005) An economic analysis of acting White. Q J Econ 120(2):551–583Google Scholar
  14. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Becker G (1957) The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Berg EL, Ruth W (2009) Cultures of the sorld: Senegal. Benchmark Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games Econ Behav 10(1):122–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? Am Econ Rev 94(4):991–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bisin A, Patacchini E, Verdier TA, Zenou Y (2008) Are Muslim immigrants different in terms of cultural integration? J Eur Econ Assoc 6(2-3):445–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bisin A, Patacchini E, Verdier TA, Zenou Y (2011a) Errata corrige are Muslim immigrants different in terms of cultural integration? J Eur Econ Assoc 9(5):1012–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bisin A, Patacchini E, Verdier TA, Zenou Y (2011b) Immigrants and the labour market. Econ Policy 26(65):57–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bisin A, Patacchini E, Verdier TA, Zenou Y (2011c) Formation and persistence of oppositional identities. Eur Econ Rev 55(8):1046–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Blalock HM (1967) Toward a theory of minority-group relations. Capricorn Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Bouzar D, Bouzar L (2009) Allah a-t-il sa place dans l’entreprise? Albin Michel, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Caldwell C (2009) Reflections on the revolution in Europe: immigration, Islam, and the West. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral game theory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Cannot-Brown W (2009) Jola. In: Asante M K, Mazama A (eds) Encyclopedia of African religion. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  28. Constant AF, Zimmermann KF (2008) Measuring ethnic identity and its impact on economic behavior. J Eur Econ Assoc 6(2-3):424–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Constant AF, Gataullina L, Zimmermann KF (2009) Ethnosizing immigrants. J Econ Behav Org 69(3):274–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cox JC (2004) How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games Econ Behav 46(2):260–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davila A, Mora M (2005) Changes in the earnings of Arab men in the US between 2000 and 2002. J Popul Econ 18(4):587–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dustmann C (1996) The social assimilation of immigrants. J Popul Econ 9(1):37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Diop AM (1988) Stéréotypes et stratégies. In: Leveau R, Kepel G (eds) Les Musulmans dans la société française. Presses de la Foundation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, Paris, pp 77–98Google Scholar
  34. Eckel CC, Wilson R K (2004) Is trust a risky decision? J Econ Behav Org 55(4):447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eckel CC, Wilson RK (2006) Judging a book by its cover: beauty and expectations in the trust game. Polit Res Q 59(2):189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Eguia JX (2012) Discrimination and assimilation. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  37. Fang H, Loury GC (2005) Dysfunctional identities can be rational. Am Econ Rev 95(2):104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2001) Discrimination in a segmented society: an experimental approach. Q J Econ 116(1):351–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fordham S, Ogbu JU (1986) Black students’ school successes: coping with the burden of acting white. Urban Rev 18(3):176–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fordham S (1996) Blacked out: dilemmas of race, identity and the success at capital high. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Fryer RG (2009) An empirical analysis of acting white. J Public Econ 94(56):380–396Google Scholar
  42. Gastellu J-M (1981) L’égalitarisme économique des Serer du Sénégal. ORSTOM, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Georgiadis A, Manning A (2011) Change and continuity among minority communities in Britain. J Popul Econ 24(2):541–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gorinas C (2014) Ethnic identity, majority norms, and the native–immigrant employment gap. J Popul Econ 27(1):225–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gould E D, Klor E F (2012) The long-run effect of 9/11: terrorism, backlash, and assimilation of Muslim immigrants in the West. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  46. Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J Econ Lit 42(4):1009–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hertwig R, Ortmann A (2001) Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists? Behav Brain Sci 24(3):383–403Google Scholar
  48. Jacquemet N, Yannelis C (2012) Indiscriminate discrimination: a correspondence test for ethnic homophily in the Chicago labor market. Labour Econ 19(6):824–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jamison J, Karlan D, Schechter L (2008) To deceive or not to deceive: the effect of deception on behavior in future laboratory experiments. J Econ Behav Org 68(3-4):477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J Bus 59(4):285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laitin DD (1995) Marginality: a microperspective. Ration Soc 7(1):31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Linares O (1992) Power, prayer and production: the Jola of Casamance, Senegal. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Mackie G (1996) Ending footbinding and infibulation: a convention account. Am Soc Rev 61(6):999–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Manning A, Roy S (2010) Culture clash or culture club? National identity in Britain. Econ J 120(542):F72–F100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McWhorter JH (2000) Losing the race: self-sabotage in black America. Free, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Mecham Q (2006) From the sacred to the state: institutional origins of Islamist political mobilization. PhD Dissertation, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  57. Paluck EL, Green DP (2009) Prejudice reduction: what works? A critical look at evidence from the field and the laboratory. Annu Rev Psychol 60:339–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pew Research Center Report (2011) The future of the global Muslim population. Projections for 2010–2030Google Scholar
  59. Pope D, Price J, Wolfers J (2011) Awareness reduces racial bias. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  60. Price J, Wolfers J (2010) Racial discrimination among NBA referees. Q J Econ 125(4):1859–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riphahn RT (2003) Cohort effects in the educational attainment of second generation immigrants in Germany: an analysis of census data. J Popul Econ 16(4):711–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schelling TC (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Shields MA, Price SW (2002) The English language fluency and occupational success of ethnic minority immigrant men living in English metropolitan areas. J Popul Econ 15(1):137–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith E (2010) Des arts de faire société: parentés à plaisanteries et constructions identitaires en Afrique de l’Ouest (Sénégal), Doctorat de Science Politique. Institut d’Etudes Politiques de ParisGoogle Scholar
  65. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46(1):35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. van Ours JC, Veenman J (2003) The educational attainment of second-generation immigrants in The Netherlands. J Popul Econ 16(4):739–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire L. Adida
    • 1
  • David D. Laitin
    • 2
  • Marie-Anne Valfort
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Paris School of EconomicsParis 1 Panthéon Sorbonne UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations