Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 961–997 | Cite as

The impact of changes in the marital status on return migration of family migrants

  • Govert E. BijwaardEmail author
  • Stijn van Doeselaar
Original Paper

Abstract

Many migrants have non-labour motives to migrate, and they differ substantially from labour migrants in their migration behaviour. For family migrants, the decision to return is highly influenced by changes in their marital status. Using administrative panel data on the entire population of recent family immigrants to the Netherlands, we estimate the effect of a divorce and remarriage on the hazard of leaving the Netherlands using a ‘timing of events’ model. The model allows for correlated unobserved heterogeneity across the migration, the divorce and remarriage processes. The family migrants are divided into five groups based on the Human Development Index (HDI) of their country of birth. We find that both divorce and remarriage increase return of family migrants from less-developed countries. Remarriage of family migrants from developed countries makes them more prone to stay. Young migrants are influenced most by a divorce. The impact of the timing of a divorce and remarriage on return is quantified graphically.

Keywords

Temporary migration Timing-of-events method Marital status dynamics 

JEL Classification

J12 F22 C41 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is based on van Doeselaar’s Master thesis in Econometrics at Tilburg University. Financial support from the NORFACE research programme on Migration in Europe—Social, Economic, Cultural and Policy Dynamics is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Statistics Netherlands, Ruben van Gaalen in particular, for the data support. We thank Arthur van Soest and Jaap Abbring for the helpful comments. We would also thank the two anonymous referees and the editor-in-chief, Klaus Zimmermann, who provided very valuable inputs for a substantial revision of an earlier draft.

References

  1. Abbring JH, van den Berg GJ (2003) The non-parametric identification of treatment effects in duration models. Econometrica 71:1491–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aydemir A (2011) Immigrant selection and short-term labor market outcomes by visa category. J Popul Econ 24:451–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aydemir A, Robinson C (2008) Global labor markets, return and onward migration. Can J Econ 41:1285–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker GS (1974a) A theory of marriage: part I. J Pol Econ 81:813–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS (1974b) A theory of marriage: part II. J Pol Econ 81:S11–S26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker GS (1991) A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker GS, Landes EM, Michael RT (1977) An economic analysis of marital instability. J Pol Econ 85:1141–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bijwaard GE (2010) Immigrant migration dynamics model for The Netherlands. J Popul Econ 23:1213–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bijwaard GE, Wahba J (2013) Do high-income or low-income immigrants leave faster? Discussion paper 13–13, NORFACEGoogle Scholar
  10. Bijwaard GE, Schluter C, Wahba J (2013) The impact of labour market dynamics on the return-migration of immigrants. Rev Econ Stat. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00389
  11. Borjas GJ (1999) The economic analysis of immigration. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3A, chapter 28. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Borjas GJ, Bratsberg B (1996) Who leaves? The outmigration of the foreign-born. Rev Econ Stat 78:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyle P, Cooke T, Halfacree K, Smith D (2001) A cross-national comparison of the impact of family migration on women’s employment status. Demography 38(2):201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyle PJ, Kulu H, Cooke T, Gayle V, Mulder CH (2008) Moving and union dissolution. Demography 45:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiswick CU, Lehrer EL (1990) On marriage-specific human capital its role as a determinant of remarriage. J Popul Econ 3:193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crépon B, Ferracci M, Fougére D (2012) Training the unemployed in France: how does it affect unemployment duration and recurrence? Ann Econ Stat 108:175–200Google Scholar
  17. Doiron D, Mendolia S (2012) The impact of job loss on family dissolution. J Popul Econ 25:367–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dustmann C (1995) Return migration: the European experience. Econ Pol 22:214–250Google Scholar
  19. Dustmann C (2003) Children and return migration. J Popul Econ 16:815–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dustmann C, Weiss Y (2007) Return migration: theory and empirical evidence. Brit J Indus Rel 45:236–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edin PA, Lalonde RJ, Åslund O (2000) Emigration of immigrants and measures of immigrant assimilation: evidence from Sweden. Swed Econ Rev 7:163–204Google Scholar
  22. Flowerdew R, Al-Hamad A (2004) The relationship between marriage, divorce and migration in a British data set. J Ethn Mig Studies 30:339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibson J, McKenzie D (2011) The microeconomic determinants of emigration and return migration of the best and brightest: evidence from the Pacific. J Dev Econ 95:18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill JK (1987) Immigrant decisions concerning durations of stay and migratory frequency. J Dev Econ 25:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jasso G, Rosenzweig MR (1982) Estimating the emigration rates of legal immigrants using administrative and survey data: the 1971 cohort of immigrants to the US. Demography 19:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jasso G, Rosenzweig MR (1995) Do immigrants screened for skills do better than family reunification immigrants? Int Mig Rev 29:85–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen P, Pedersen PJ (2007) To stay or not to stay? out-migration of immigrants from Denmark. Int Mig 45:87–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalmijn M, van Tubergen F (2006) Ethnic intermarriage in the Netherlands: confirmations and refutations of accepted insights. Eur J Popul 22:371–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehrer EL (2008) Age at marriage and marital instability: revisiting the Becker–Landes–Michael hypothesis. J Popul Econ 21:463–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyngstad TH, Jalovaara M (2010) A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demo Res 23:257–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller P (1999) Immigration policy and immigrant quality: the Australian points system. Am Econ Rev 89:192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mincer J (1978) Family migration decisions. J Pol Econ 86:749–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nivalainen S (2004) Determinants of family migration: short moves vs. long moves. J Popul Econ 17:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oppenheimer VK (1997) Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: the specialization and trading model. Ann Rev Soc 23:431–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Osikominu A (2013) Quick job entry or long-term human capital development? The dynamic effects of alternative training schemes. Rev Econ Stud 80:313–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodriguez-Planas N, Vegas R (2011) Moroccans’ assimilation in Spain: family-based versus labor-based migration. Mid East Dev J 3:119–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sandell S (1977) Women and the economics of family migration. Rev Econ Stat 59(4):406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UNDP (2011) Human Development Index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2011_EN_Table1.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2012
  39. van den Berg GJ (2001) Duration models: specification, identification, and multiple duration. In: Heckman J, Leamer E (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol 5, chapter 55. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3381–3460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Wolff AC (2012) Misuse of the right of family reunification, The Netherlands contribution. EMN studies, Dutch National Contact Point for the European Migration NetworkGoogle Scholar
  41. van Tubergen F, Maas I (2007) Ethnic intermarriage among immigrants in the Netherlands: an analysis of population data. Soc Science Res 36:1065–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI) and IZA BonnThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Hay GroupAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations