Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 797–823 | Cite as

The dynamics of homeownership among the 50+ in Europe

  • Viola Angelini
  • Agar Brugiavini
  • Guglielmo Weber
Original Paper


We use life history data covering households in 13 European countries to analyse residential moves past the age of 50. We observe four types of moves: renting to owning, owning to renting, trading up or trading down for homeowners. We find that in the younger group (aged 50–64), trading up and purchase decisions prevail; in the older group (65+), trading down and selling are more common. Overall, moves are rare, particularly in countries characterised by high transaction costs. Most moves are driven by changes in household composition (divorce, widowhood, nest leaving by children), but economic factors play a role: low-income households who are house-rich and cash-poor are more likely to sell their home late in life.


Housing Life cycle Ageing SHARELIFE 

JEL Classifications

D91 E21 J14 



We thank two referees for their extremely useful comments and suggestions. We are also grateful for comments made by the audiences at the Labour Economics Workshop, Brixen, May 2011; the Bank of Italy-Dondena Workshop on Public Policies, Social Dynamics and Population, July 2011; and the European University Institute, October 2011. This paper uses data from SHARELIFE release 1, as of November 24, 2010 or SHARE release 2.4.0, as of March 17, 2011. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th Framework Programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life), through the 6th Framework Programme (projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE, CIT5-CT-2005-028857, and SHARELIFE, CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and through the 7th Framework Programme (SHARE-PREP, 211909 and SHARE-LEAP, 227822). Additional funding from the US National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, Y1-AG-4553-01 and OGHA 04-064, IAG BSR06-11, R21 AG025169) as well as from various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see for a full list of funding institutions).


  1. Andrews D, Caldera Sanchez A, Johansson Å (2011) Housing market and structural policies in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 836. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelini V (2007) The strategic bequest motive: evidence from SHARE. “Marco Fanno” Working Papers 0062. Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università di Padova, PaduaGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelini V, Brugiavini A, Weber G (2009) Ageing and unused capacity in Europe: is there an early retirement trap? Econ Policy 59:463–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelini V, Brugiavini A, Weber G (2011) Does downsizing of housing equity alleviate financial distress in old age? In: Börsch-Supan A, Brandt M, Hank K, Schröder M (eds) Individual and the welfare state. Life histories in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angelini V, Laferrère A, Weber G (2011) Homeownership in old age at the crossroad between personal and national histories. In: Börsch-Supan A, Brandt M, Hank K, Schröder M (eds) Individual and the welfare state. Life histories in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Artle R, Varaiya P (1978) Life cycle consumption and ownership. J Econ Theory 18:35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Attanasio OP, Banks J, Meghir C, Weber G (1999) Humps and bumps in lifetime consumption. J Bus Econ Stat 17:22–35Google Scholar
  8. Attanasio OP, Bottazzi R, Low H, Nesheim L, Wakefield M (2011) Modelling the demand for housing over the lifecycle. Rev Econ Dyn 15:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Banks J, Blundell R, Oldfield Z, Smith JP (2012) Housing mobility and downsizing at older ages in Britain and the United States. Economica 79:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Börsch-Supan A, Brandt B, Hank K, Schröder M (2011) The individual and the welfare state. Life histories in Europe. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiuri MC, Jappelli T (2010) Do the elderly reduce housing equity? An international comparison. J Popul Econ 23:643–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Nardi M, French E, Jones JB (2010) Why do the elderly save? The role of medical expenses. J Polit Econ 118:39–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henderson JV, Ioannides YM (1983) A model of housing tenure choice. Am Econ Rev 73:98–111Google Scholar
  14. Mitchell OS, Piggott J (2003) Housing equity and senior security. ESRI International Conference, NBER WP 12444. Forthcoming. In: Tachibanaki T (ed) New challenges for social security. NBER, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakajima M, Telyukova IA (2011) Home equity withdrawal in retirement. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  16. Poterba JM, Venti SF, Wise DA (2010) The asset cost of poor health. NBER Working Papers 16389. NBER, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sinai T, Souleles NS (2005) Owner-occupied housing as a hedge against rent risk. Q J Econ 120:763–789Google Scholar
  18. Venti SF, Wise DA (2004) Aging and housing equity: another look. In: Wise DA (ed) Perspectives on the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 127–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang F (2009) Consumption over the life cycle: how different is housing?Rev Econ Dyn 12:423–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viola Angelini
    • 1
  • Agar Brugiavini
    • 2
  • Guglielmo Weber
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Econometrics and FinanceUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsCa’Foscari University of VeniceVeniceItaly
  3. 3.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of PaduaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations