Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 963–982 | Cite as

A model of voluntary childlessness

  • Paula E. GobbiEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Demographers and sociologists have studied why women remain childless for more than two decades; however, this specific choice of zero fertility has not interested economists. Permanent childlessness, in developed countries, can concern up to 30 % of the women in a cohort. Childlessness rates can be positively related to average fertility for some cohorts of women. This paper provides an explanation for this using an endogenous fertility model where individuals have different preferences for children. The main mechanism considered goes through the intergenerational evolution of preferences: I show that a reduction in the gender wage gap, or an increase in the fixed cost of becoming a parent, has a negative effect on both fertility and childlessness. The reduction of childlessness is due to a composition effect: small families shrink more than larger families, and this reduces childlessness.

Keywords

Fertility Childlessness Female labor-market participation 

JEL Classification

J11 J13 O11 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank two referees, Thomas Baudin, Raouf Boucekkine, Hippolyte d’Albis, Matthias Doepke, David de la Croix, Axel Gosseries, Ross Guest, Fabio Mariani, Alexia Prskawetz, and Alice Schoonbroodt for helpful comments and references. I also acknowledge the financial support of the Belgian–French speaking community (Grant ARC 009-14018 on “Sustainability”).

Supplementary material

148_2012_457_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (134 kb)
Appendix for: A Model of Voluntary Childlessness (PDF 134 KB)
148_2012_457_MOESM2_ESM.tex (39 kb)
Appendix for: A Model of Voluntary Childlessness (TEX 38.7 KB)

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Autor DH, David L (2004) Women, war, and wages: the effect of female labor supply on the wage structure at midcentury. J Polit Econ 112(3):497–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro RJ, Becker GS (1986) Altruism and the economic theory of fertility. Popul Dev Rev Suppl 12:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudin T, de la Croix D, Gobbi P (2012) DINKs, DEWKs and Co., marriage, fertility and childlessness in the United States. IRES Discuss Pap 2012/13Google Scholar
  4. Becker GS (1981) A treatise on the family. Enlarged edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Bianchi S, Robinson J, Sayer L (2004) Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. Am J Sociol 110(1):1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisin A, Verdier T (2001) The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. J Econ Theory 97(2):298–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burda M, Hamermesh DS, Weil P (2006) Total work, gender and social norms. NBER Work Pap 13000Google Scholar
  8. Census Bureau (2006) Table SF2. Distribution of women 40 to 44 years old by number of children ever born and marital status: selected years, 1970 to 2010. http://www.census.gov/hhes/fertility/data/cps/supplemental.html. Accessed 24 Oct 2012
  9. Cigno A (1991) Economics of the family. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Cigno A (2012) Marriage as a commitment device. Rev Econ Househ 10(2):193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de la Croix D, Doepke M (2003) Inequality and growth: why differential fertility matters. Am Econ Rev 93(4):1091–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de la Croix D, Licandro O (2012) The child is father of the man: implications for the demographic transition. Econ J. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02523.x Google Scholar
  13. de Jong GF, Sell RR (1977) Changes in childlessness in the United States: a demographic path analysis. Popul Stud 31(1):129–141Google Scholar
  14. Doepke M, Hazan M, Maoz YD (2007) The baby boom and world war II: a macroeconomic analysis. NBER Work Pap 13707Google Scholar
  15. Erosa A, Fuster L, Restuccia D (2005) A quantitative theory of the gender gap in wages. IMDEA Work Pap Ser Econ Soc Sci 2010/04Google Scholar
  16. Fernández R, Fogli A (2006) Fertility: the role of culture and family experience. J Eur Econ Assoc 4(2-3):552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galor O, Weil DN (1996) The gender gap, fertility, and growth. Am Econ Rev 86(3):374–387Google Scholar
  18. Goldin C (1990) Understanding the gender gap: an economic history of American women. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hakim C (2000) Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Hakim C (2003) A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory. Popul Dev Rev 29(3):349–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houseknecht SK (1982) Voluntary childlessness: toward a theoretical integration. J Fam Issues 3(4):459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones LE, Manuelli RE, McGrattan ER (2003) Why are married women working so much? Fed Reserve Bank Minneap, Staff RepGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones LE, Tertilt M (2008) An economic history of fertility in the US: 1826–1960. In: Rupert P (ed) Frontiers of family economics, chapter 5Google Scholar
  24. Kiernan KE (1989) Who remains childless? J Biosoc Sci 21(4):387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Livi-Bacci M (1977) A history of Italian fertility during the last two centuries. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Manser M, Brown M (1980) Marriage and household decision making: a bargaining analysis. Int Econ Rev 21(1):31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazzocco M (2007) Household intertemporal behaviour: a collective characterization and a test of commitment. Rev Econ Stud 74(3):857–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McElroy MB, Horney MJ (1981) Nash-bargained household decisions: toward a generalization of the theory of demand. Int Econ Rev 22(2):333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McFalls JA (1979) Frustrated fertility: a population paradox. Popul Bull 34(2):3–43Google Scholar
  30. Mencarini L, Tanturri ML (2006) High fertility or childlessness: micro-level determinants of reproductive behaviour in Italy. Popul 61(4):389–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mencarini L, Tanturri ML (2008) Childless or childfree? An insight into voluntary childlessness in Italy. Popul Dev Rev 34(1):51–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgan PS (1991) Late nineteenth—and early twentieth—century childlessness. Am J Sociol 97(3):779–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray JE, Lagger BA (2001) Involuntary childlessness and voluntary fertility control during the fertility transition: evidence from men who graduated from an American college. Popul Stud 55(1):25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Neill J, Polachek S (1993) Why the gender gap in wages narrowed in the 1980s. J Labor Econ 11(1):205–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poston DL, Trent K (1982) International variability in childlessness: a descriptive and analytical study. J Fam Issues 3(4):473–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rowland DT (2007) Historical trends in childlessness. J Fam Issues 28(10):1311–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruggles S, Trent JA, Genadek K, Goeken R, Schroeder MB, Sobek M (2010) Integrated public use microdata series: version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  38. Skinner J (1991) Housing and saving in the United States. NBER Work Pap 3874Google Scholar
  39. Toulemon L (1996) Very few couples remain voluntarily childless. Popul 8:1–27Google Scholar
  40. Turchi BA (1975) The demand for children: the economics of fertility in the United States. Ballinger, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. van de Kaa DJ (1987) Europe’s second demographic transition. Popul Bull 42(1):1–59Google Scholar
  42. Vitali A, Billari F, Prskawetz A, Testa MR (2009) Preference Theory and low fertility: a comparative perspective. Eur J Popul 25(4):413–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRESUniversité Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations