Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 1035–1056 | Cite as

The long run consequences of unilateral divorce laws on children—evidence from SHARELIFE

  • Steffen ReinholdEmail author
  • Thorsten Kneip
  • Gerrit Bauer
Original Paper

Abstract

Previous research has shown adverse effects of growing up under unilateral divorce laws on long-term outcomes of children. It remains an open question of whether these effects of early childhood conditions arise due to divorce laws raising the likelihood of parental marital disruption or whether unilateral divorce laws also affect children in intact marriages by changing intra-household bargaining. Using recently available data from SHARELIFE for 11 Western European countries, we address this question employing a difference-in-differences approach and controlling for childhood family structure and socioeconomic status. Like previous research, we find adverse effects of growing up under unilateral divorce laws on the well-being of children. This effect remains even when controlling for childhood variables. We conclude that unilateral divorce laws affect children by changing family bargaining in intact marriages.

Keywords

Unilateral divorce Childhood conditions Difference-in-differences Intra-household bargaining Children’s human capital formation 

JEL Classification

D13 J12 J13 

References

  1. Amato PR (2001) Children of divorce in the 1990s: an update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. J Fam Psychol 15(3):355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato PR, Keith B (1991) Parental divorce and the well-being of children: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 110(1):26–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker GS (1993). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Braver SL, Whitley M, Ng C (1993) Who divorced whom? Methodological and theoretical issues. J Divorce Remarriage 20:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown M, Flinn CJ (2011) Family law effects on divorce, fertility and child investment. Working Paper, New York UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Browning M, Chiappori PA (1998) Efficient intra-household allocations: a general characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica 66(6):1241–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cáceres-Delpiano J, Giolito E (2008) How unilateral divorce affects children. IZA Discussion Paper 3342Google Scholar
  8. Cáceres-Delpiano J, Giolito E (2012) The impact of unilateral divorce on crime. J Labor Econ 30(1):215–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chase-Lansdale PL, Cherlin AJ, Kiernan KE (1995) The long-term effects of parental divorce on the mental health of young adults: a developmental perspective. Child Dev 66(6):1614–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherlin AJ, Kiernan KE, Chase-Lansdale PL (1995) Parental divorce in childhood and demographic outcomes in young adulthood. Demography 32(3):299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherlin AJ, Chase-Lansdale PL, McRae C (1998) Effects of parental divorce on mental health throughout the life course. Am Sociol Rev 63(2):239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cigno A (2012) Marriage as a commitment device. Rev Econ Househ. doi: 10.1007/s11150–012–9141–1 Google Scholar
  13. Dawson DA (1991) Family structure and children’s health and well-being: data from the 1988 National Health Interview Survey on child health. J Marriage Fam 53(3):573–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Del Boca D, Flinn CJ (2012) Endogenous household interaction. J Econom 166:49–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flinn CJ (2000) Modes of interaction between divorced parents. Int Econ Rev 41:545–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedberg L (1998) Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rates? Evidence from panel data. Am Econ Rev 88:608–627Google Scholar
  17. González L, Viitanen TK (2009) The effect of divorce laws on divorce rates in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 53:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. González L, Viitanen T (2008) The long term effects of legalizing divorce on children. IZA Discussion Paper 3789Google Scholar
  19. Goode WJ (1993) World changes in divorce patterns. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  20. Gruber J (2004) Is making divorce easier bad for children? The long-run implications of unilateral divorce. J Labor Econ 22(4):799–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heckman JJ, Layne-Farrar A, Todd P (1996) Does measured school quality really matter? An examination of the earnings quality relationship. In: Burtless G (ed) Does money matter? Brookings Institution, Washington, pp 192–289Google Scholar
  22. Johnson JH, Mazingo CJ (2000) The economic consequences of unilateral divorce for children. Working Paper, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  23. Jürges H, Reinhold S, Salm M (2011) Does schooling affect health behavior? Evidence from the educational expansion in Western Germany. Econ Educ Rev 30:862–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keith VM, Finlay B (1988) The impact of parental divorce on children’s educational attainment, marital timing, and the likelihood of divorce. J Marriage Fam 50(3):797–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kemptner D, Jürges H, Reinhold S (2011) Changes in compulsory schooling and the causal effect of education on health. J Health Econ 30(2):340–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kiernan KE, Cherlin AJ (1999) Parental divorce and partnership dissolution in adulthood: evidence from a British cohort study. Pop Stud-J Demogr 53(1):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kneip T, Bauer G (2009) Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates in Western Europe? J Marriage Fam 71:592–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kneip T, Bauer G, Reinhold S (2011) Direct and indirect effects of unilateral divorce law on marital stability. MEA Discussion Paper 248–11Google Scholar
  29. Lampard R, Peggs K (1999) Repartnering: the relevance of parenthood and gender to cohabitation and remarriage among the formerly married. Br J Sociol 50(3):443–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lundberg S, Pollak RA (1993) Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. J Polit Econ 101(6):988–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manser M, Brown M (1980) Marriage and household decision making: a bargaining analysis. Int Econ Rev 21:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McElroy MB, Horney MJ (1981) Nash-bargained household decisions: towards a generalization of the theory of demand. Int Econ Rev 22:333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parkman AM (1992) Unilateral divorce and the labor-force participation rate of married women, revisited. Am Econ Rev 82(3):671–678Google Scholar
  34. Parkman AM (2000) Good intentions gone awry. No-fault divorce and the American family. Rowman and Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  35. Paxson C, Waldfogel J (2002) Work, welfare, and child maltreatment. J Labor Econ 20(3):435–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peters HE (1986) Marriage and divorce: informational constraints and private contracting. Am Econ Rev 76:437–454Google Scholar
  37. Pischke JS, von Wachter T (2008) Zero returns to compulsory schooling in Germany. Rev Econ Stat 90(3):592–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prince M, Reischies F, Beekman ATF et al (1999) Development of the EURO–D scale—a European Union initiative to compare symptoms of depression in 14 European centres. Br J Psychiatr 174:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rasul I (2005) Marriage markets and divorce laws. J Law Econ Organ 22(1):30–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevenson B (2008) Divorce law and women’s labor supply. J Empir Legal Stud 5(4):853–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2006) Bargaining in the shadow of the law: divorce laws and family distress. Q J Econ 121(1):267–288Google Scholar
  42. Wolfers J (2006) Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1802–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steffen Reinhold
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thorsten Kneip
    • 2
  • Gerrit Bauer
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institute for Social Law and Social PolicyMEAMunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of Munich (LMU)MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations