Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 673–701 | Cite as

The health returns to schooling—what can we learn from twins?

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper estimates the health returns to schooling, using a twin design. For this purpose, I use data on monozygotic twins from the Midlife in the United States survey. The results suggest that completing high school improves health, as measured through self-reported health, chronic conditions, and exercise behavior, but that additional schooling does not lead to additional health gains. Controlling for certain early life factors that may vary within twin pairs does not alter the main conclusions of this paper.

Keywords

Health production Education Schooling Twins  Returns to education Ability bias 

JEL Classification

I12 I11 J14 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the seminar participants at the American Society of Health Economists, European Association of Labour Economists, Erasmus University, European Economic Association, University of Mannheim, Uppsala University, Lund University, and Swedish Institute for Social Research for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Aigner D (1973) Regression with a binary independent variable subject to errors of observation. J Econom 1:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin V, Behrman J, Spector TD (2010) Does more schooling improve health behaviours and health outcomes? Evidence from U.K. Twins Working paper: Royal HollowayGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin V (2011) Returns to education: evidence from U.K. twins: comment. Am Econ Rev 101:1629–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arendt JN (2005) Does education cause better health? A panel data analysis using school reforms for identification. Econ Educ Rev 24:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashenfelter O, Krueger A (1994) Estimating the returns to schooling using a new sample of twins. Am Econ Rev 84:1157–1174Google Scholar
  6. Ashenfelter O, Rouse C (1998) Income, schooling and ability: evidence from a new sample of identical twins. Q J Econ 113:253–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker GS, Mulligan CB (1997) The endogenous determination of time preference. Q J Econ 112:729–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Behrman JR, Rosenzweig MR (2004) Returns to birthweight. Rev Econ Stat 86:586–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Behrman JR, Kohler H, Myrup-Jensen V et al (2011) Does more schooling reduce hospitalization and delay mortality? New evidence based on Danish twins. Demography 48:1347–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Behrman JR, Li H, Suen W, Yang Z, Zhang J (2006) Does more schooling improve health behaviors and health outcomes? Evidence from Chinese twins (Working paper). Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  11. Belman D, Heywood J (1991) Sheepskin effects in the return to education. Rev Econ Stat 73:720–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Black SE, Devereux PJ, Salvanes KG (2007) From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes. Q J Econ 122:409–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonjour D, Cherkas L, Haskel J et al (2003) Returns to education: evidence from UK twins. Am Econ Rev 93:1799–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brim OG, Baltes PB, Bumpass LL et al (2003) National survey of midlife development in the United States (MIDUS), 1995–1996 [Computer file]. 2nd ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: DataStat, Inc./Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School, Dept. of Health Care Policy [producers], 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]Google Scholar
  15. Bound J, Solon G (1999) Double trouble: on the value of twin-based estimation of the return to schooling. Econ Educ Rev 18:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Card D (1999) The causal effect of education on earnings. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) The handbook of labor economics, Volume 3A. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 1801–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chou S, Liu J, Grossman M et al (2010) Parental education and child health: evidence from a natural experiment in Taiwan. Am Econ J: Applied 2: 33–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Currie J, Moretti E (2003) Mother’s education and the intergenerational transmission of human capital: evidence from college openings. Q J Econ 118:1495–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Walque D (2007) Does education affect smoking behavior? Evidence using the Vietnam draft as an instrument for college education. J Health Econ 26:877–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuchs VR. (1982) Time preference and health: an exploratory study. In: Fuchs VR (ed) Economic aspects of health. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 93–120Google Scholar
  21. Fujiwara T, Kawachi I (2009) Is education causally related to better health? A twin fixed-effect study in the USA. Int J Epidemiol 38:1310–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griliches Zvi (1979) Sibling models and data in economics: beginnings of a survey. J Polit Econ 87:37–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimard F, Parent D (2007) Education and smoking: were Vietnam War draft avoiders also more likely to avoid smoking? J Health Econ 26:896–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groot W (2000) Adaption and scale of references bias in self-assessments of quality of life. J Health Econ 19:403–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grossman M (1972) On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J Polit Econ 80:223–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmlund H, Lindahl M, Plug E (2011) The causal effect of parents’ schooling on children’s schooling: a comparison of estimation methods. J Econ Lit 49:615–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hungerford T, Solon G (1987) Sheepskin effects in the return to education. Rev Econ Stat 69:175–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Idler EI, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Isacsson G (2004) Estimating the economic returns to educational levels using data on twins. J Appl Econ 99:99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaeger DA (1997) Reconciling the old and new census bureau education questions: recommendations for researchers. J Bus Econ Stat 15:300–309Google Scholar
  31. Jürges H, Reinhold S, Salm M (2011) Does schooling affect health behavior? Evidence from the educational expansion in Western Germany. Econ Educ Rev 30:862–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kane TJ, Rouse C, Staiger D (1999) Estimating returns to schooling when schooling is mismeasured. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7235Google Scholar
  33. Kenkel D, Lillard D, Mathios A (2006) The roles of high school completion and GED receipt in smoking and obesity. J Labor Econ 24:635–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knowles J, Postlewaite A (2005) Wealth inequality and parental transmission of savings behavior. Mimeo, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  35. Lleras-Muney A (2005) The relationship between education and adult mortality in the U.S. Rev Econ Stud 72:189–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lochner L (2011) Non-production benefits of education: crime, health, and good citizenship. NBER Working Paper No. 16722Google Scholar
  37. Lundborg P (2007) Smoking, information sources, and risk perceptions. New evidence on swedish data. J Risk Uncertain 34:217–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lundborg P (2008) The health returns to education—what can we learn from twins? IZA Working Paper 3399Google Scholar
  39. Lundborg P (2010) Why are identical twins not identical? Parental treatment and schooling among monozygotic twins. Mimeo, Department of Economics, Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
  40. Nichols RC, Bilbro WC (1966) The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet 16:265–275Google Scholar
  41. Oreopoulos P (2006) Estimating average and local average treatment effects of education when compulsory school laws really matter. Am Econ Rev 96:152–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Powdthavee N (2010) Does education reduce the risk of hypertension? Estimating the biomarker effect of compulsory schooling in England. J Hum Cap 4:173–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pronzato C (2012) An examination of paternal and maternal intergenerational transmission of schooling. J Popul Econ 25:591–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosenzweig MR, Schultz TP (1982) The behavior of mothers as inputs to child health: the determinants of birth weight, gestation, and rate of fetal growth. In: Fuchs VR (ed) Economic aspects of health. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 53–92Google Scholar
  45. Royer H (2009) Separated at girth: US twin estimates of the effects of birth weight. Am Econ J Appl Econ 1:49–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webbink D, Martin NG, Visscher PM (2010) Does education reduce the probability of being overweight? J Health Econ 29:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.IZABonnGermany
  4. 4.Tinbergen InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Health Economics Program LundLundSweden
  6. 6.Centre for Economic Demography LundLundSweden

Personalised recommendations