Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 5–32 | Cite as

Opting for families: recent trends in the fertility of highly educated women

Original Paper

Abstract

After declining for many years, there are indications that fertility may be increasing among highly educated women. This paper provides a comprehensive study of recent trends in the fertility of college-graduate women. In contrast to most existing work, we find that college graduate women are indeed opting for families. Data from the Current Population Surveys and Vital Statistics Birth Data both show that fertility increases among college graduate women, especially at older ages since the mid- to late 1990s. There are also increases in fertility among less-educated women, but these are concentrated at younger ages.

Keywords

Opting out Fertility High-skilled women 

JEL Classification

J13 J16 

Supplementary material

148_2012_411_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (289 kb)
(PDF 289 KB)

References

  1. Abma JC, Martinez GM (2006) Childlessness among older women in the United States: trends and profiles. J Marriage Fam 68(4):1045–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antecol H (2010) The opt-out revolution: a descriptive analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No 5089Google Scholar
  3. Autor D, Dorn D (2011) The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US Labor Market. NBER Working Paper No 15150Google Scholar
  4. Bailey MJ (2010) Momma’s got the pill: how Anthony Comstock and Griswold v Connecticut Shaped US Childbearing. Am Econ Rev 100(1):98–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belkin L (2003) The opt-out revolution. New York Times MagazineGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2(3):228–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau FD, Kahn LM (2006) The US gender pay gap in the 1990s: slowing convergence. Ind Labor Relat Rev 60(1):45–66Google Scholar
  8. Boushey H (2005) Are women opting out? Debunking the Myth. CEPR Briefing PaperGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohany SR, Sok E (2007) Trends in labor force participation of married mothers of infants. Mon Labor Rev 130(2):9–16Google Scholar
  10. Cortes P, Tessada J (2011) Low-skilled immigration and the labor supply of highly skilled women. Am Econ J Appl Econ 3(3):88–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feyrer J, Sacerdote B, Stern AD (2008) Will the stork return to Europe and Japan? Understanding fertility within developed nations. J Econ Perspect 22(3):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furtado D, Hock H (2010) Low skilled immigration and work–fertility tradeoffs among high skilled US natives. Am Econ Rev: Papers & Proceedings 100(2):224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldin C (1997) Career and family: college women look to the past. In: Blau FD, Ehrenberg RG (ed) Gender and family issues in the workplace. Russell Sage, New York, pp 20–58Google Scholar
  14. Herr JL, Wolfram C (2011) Work environment and “opt-out” rates at motherhood across high-education career paths. NBER Working Paper No 14717Google Scholar
  15. Hoekstra C, Zhao ZZ, Lambalk CB et al (2008) Dizygotic twinning. Hum Reprod Update 14(1):37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaeger DA (1997) Reconciling the old and new census bureau education questions: recommendations for researchers. J Bus Econ Stat 15(3):300–309Google Scholar
  17. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD et al (2007) Births: final data for 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports 56(6):24–25Google Scholar
  18. Mazzolari F, Ragusa G (2011) Spillovers from high-skill consumption to low-skill labor markets. Rev Econ Stat 674. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00234
  19. Percheski C (2008) Opting out? Cohort differences in professional women’s employment rates from 1960 to 2005. Am Sociol Rev 73(3):497–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rainer H, Selvaretnam G, Ulph D (2011) Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in a model of fertility choice. J Popul Econ 24(3):1101–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Martin JA et al (2003) Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997–2000. Pediatrics 111(5):1159–1166Google Scholar
  22. Schieve LA, Devine O, Boyle CA et al (2009) Estimating the contribution of non-assisted reproductive technology ovulation simulation fertility treatments to US singleton and multiple births. Am J Epidemiol 170(11):1396–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shang Q, Weinberg BA (2009) Opting for families: recent trends in the fertility of highly educated women. NBER Working Paper No 15074Google Scholar
  24. Stone P (2008) Opting out? Why women really quit careers and head home. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  25. Story L (2005) Many women at elite colleges set career path to motherhood. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  26. Vere JP (2007) “Having it all” no longer: fertility, female labor supply, and the new life choices of generation X. Demography 44(4):821–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallis C (2004) The case for staying at home. Time MagazineGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.IZABonnGermany
  4. 4.NBERCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations