Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 569–590 | Cite as

Piece rates and workplace injury: Does survey evidence support Adam Smith?

  • Keith A. Bender
  • Colin P. Green
  • John S. Heywood
Original Paper

Abstract

While piece rates are routinely associated with higher productivity and wages, they can also generate unanticipated effects. Using cross-country European data, we provide among the first general survey evidence of a strong link between piece rates and workplace injury. Despite controls for workplace hazards, job characteristics and worker effort, piece rates workers suffer a 5 percentage point greater likelihood of injury. This remains despite attempts to control for endogeneity and heterogeneity. As piece rate wage premium estimates rarely control for injury likelihood, this raises the specter that part of that premium reflects a compensating wage differential for risk of injury.

Keywords

Piece rate Injury Incentives 

JEL Classification

J33 J28 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the editor Erdal Tekin and two anonymous referees for comments on the paper. We would also like to thank participants at the 2010 Scottish Economic Society Conference, the SIRE Workshop on Workplaces and Wellbeing at the University of Dundee, the 2010 Joint Meeting of EALE and SOLE at UCL, the 2010 ESPE meetings in Essen and seminars at the economics departments at Sheffield University, Lingnan University and Northern Illinois University.

Supplementary material

148_2011_393_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (216 kb)
(PDF 215 KB)

References

  1. Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2009) Social connections and incentives in the workplace: evidence form personnel data. Econometrica 77(4):1047–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banker RD, Field JM, Schroeder RG, Sinha KK (1996) Impact of work teams on manufacturing performance: a field study. Acad Manag J 39(4):867–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum CF (2006) An introduction to modern econometrics using stata. Stata, College Station TexasGoogle Scholar
  4. Belman DL, Monaco KA, Brooks TJ (2005) Sailors of the concrete sea: A portrait of truck drivers’ work and lives. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MIGoogle Scholar
  5. Black DA, Kneisser TJ (2003) On the measurement of job risk in hedonic wage models. J Risk Uncertainty 27(3):205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boden L, Galizzi M (2003) Income losses of women and men injured at work. J Hum Resour 38(3):727–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bojilov R (2010) Estimating the effect of incentives when workers learn about their abilities. Working Paper, Columbia University, Department of Economics. 21 November 2010Google Scholar
  8. Booth AL, Frank J (1999) Earnings, productivity, and performance-related pay. J Labor Econ 17(3):447–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown C (1990) Firms’ choice of method of pay. Ind Lab Relat Rev 43(s):165s–182sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornellissen T, Heywood JS, Jirjahn U (2011) Performance pay, risk attitudes and job satisfaction. Labour Econ 18(2):229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cottini E, Lorifora C (2010) Mental health and working conditions in European countries. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 4717Google Scholar
  12. Creighton S, Stillman S, Hyslop D (2011) Returning to work from injury: longitudinal evidence on employment and earnings. Ind Labor Relat Rev 64(4):765–785Google Scholar
  13. Curme M, Stefanec N (2007) Worker quality and labor market sorting. Econ Lett 96(2):202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dale-Olsen H (2006) Estimating workers’ marginal willingness to pay for safety using linked employer–employee data. Economica 73(294):99–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster AD, Rosenzweig, MR (1994) A test for moral hazard in the labor market: contractual arrangements, effort, and health. Rev Econ Stat 74(2):213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman RD, Kleiner M (2005) The last American shoe manufactures: decreasing productivity and increasing profits in a shift from piece rates to continuous flow production. Ind Relat 44(2):307–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frick B, Gotzen U, Simmons R (2008) The hidden costs of high performance work practices: evidence form a large German Steel Company. Working Paper, Department of Management, University of Paderborn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  18. Garen J (1988) Compensating wage differentials and the endogeneity of job riskiness. Rev Econ Stat 70(1):9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibbons R (1998) Incentives and careers in organizations. J Econ Perspect 12(4):115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gielen AC, Kerkhofs MJM, van Ours JC (2010) How performance related pay affects productivity and employment. J Popul Econ 23(4):291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green CP, Heywood JS (2008) Does performance pay increase job satisfaction? Economica 75(300):710–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haley MR (2003) The response of worker effort to piece rates: evidence from the Midwest logging industry. J Hum Resour 38(4):225–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heckman JJ (1978) Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46(4):931–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones D, Kalmi P, Kauhanen, A (2010) Teams, performance-related pay, profit-sharing and productive efficiency: evidence from a food-processing plant. Ind Labor Relat Rev 63(4):606–626Google Scholar
  26. Korn EL, Graubard BI (1990) Simultaneous testing of regression coefficients with complex survey data: use of Bonferroni t-Statistics. Am Statistician 44(4):270–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lazear EP (1986) Salaries and piece rates. J Bus 59(3):405–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Am Econ Rev 90(5):1346–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacDonald G, Marx LM (2001) Adverse specialization. J Polit Econ 109(4):864–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maddala GS (1983) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in economics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Monaco K, Williams E (2000) Assessing the determinants of safety in the trucking industry. J Transport Stat 3(2):69–80Google Scholar
  32. Monfardini C, Radice R (2008) Testing exogeneity in the bivariate probit model: a Monte Carlo study. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 70(2):271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neuhauser F, Raphael S (2004) The effect of an increase in workers compensation on the duration and frequency of benefit receipt. Rev Econ Stat 86(1):288–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parent D (1999) Methods of pay and earnings: a longitudinal analysis. Ind Labor Relat Rev 53(1):71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parent D (2002) Performance pay in the United States: its determinants and effects. In: Brown M, Heywood JS (eds) Paying for performance: an international comparison. Sharpe: Armonk, NYGoogle Scholar
  36. Pekkarinen T, Riddell C (2008) Performance pay and earnings: evidence from personnel records. Ind Labor Relat Rev 61(3):297–319Google Scholar
  37. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K (2010) The effects of sick pay reform on absence and health outcomes. J Health Econ 29(2):285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodriquez DA, Targa F, Belzer M (2006) Pay incentives and truck driver safety: a case study. Ind Labor Relat Rev 59(2):205–225Google Scholar
  39. Saha A, Tamnath T, Chaudhuri R, Saiyed H (2004) An accident-risk assessment study of temporary piece rated workers. Ind Health 42(3):240–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seiler E (1984) Piece rates vs. time rates: the effect of incentives on wages. Rev Econ Stat 46(3):363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations as reprinted in 1909, edited by CJ Bullock. Collier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In: Andrews DWK, Stock JH (eds) Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 80–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sundstroem-Frisk C (1984) Behavioral control through piece-rate wages. J Occup Accid 6(1–2):49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Toupin D, LeBel L, Dubeau, D, Imbeau D, Bouthiller L (2007) Measuring the productivity and physical workload of brushcutters within the context of a production-based pay system. Forest Policy Econ 9(8):1046–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Viscusi WK (1978) Wealth effects and the premiums for job hazards. Rev Econ Stat 60(3):408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilde J (2000) Identification of multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors. Econ Lett 69(3):309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williamson A, Bohle P, Quinlan M, Kennedy D (2009) Short trips and long days: safety and health in short-haul trucking. Ind Labor Relat Rev 62(3):415–429Google Scholar
  48. Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith A. Bender
    • 1
  • Colin P. Green
    • 2
  • John S. Heywood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin—MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsLancaster University Management SchoolLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations