Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 1287–1306 | Cite as

The individual cost of sick leave

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper aims to estimate the causal effect of sick leave on subsequent earnings and employment, using an administrative dataset for Norway. To obtain experiment-like variation in sick leave among otherwise similar workers, the leniency of these workers’ physicians—certifying sickness absences—is used as an instrumental variable for sick leave. A 1 percentage point increase in a worker’s sick leave rate is found to reduce his earnings by 1.2% 2 years later. Around half of the reduction in earnings can be explained by a reduction of 0.5 percentage points in the probability of being employed.

Keywords

Sickness absence Wage formation IV estimation 

JEL Classification

J22 J31 J71 

Supplementary material

148_2011_390_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (448 kb)
(PDF 447 KB)

References

  1. Altonji JG, Pierret CR (2001) Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Q J Econ 116(1):313–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrén D, Andrén T (2008) Part-time sick leave as a treatment method? HEDG Working Paper 08/011, University of YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrén D, Andrén T (2009) How to evaluate the impact of part-time sick leave on the probability of recovering. Working Paper 13/2009, Örebro UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Biørn E, Godager G (2009) Does quality influence choice of general practitioner? An analysis of matched doctor–patient panel data. Econ Model 27(4):842–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Englund L, Tibblin G, Svärdskudd K (2000) Variations in sick-listing practice among male and female physicians of different specialities based on case vignettes. Scand J Prim Health Care 18(1):48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gielen AC, Kerkhofs MJK, van Ours JC (2010) How performance related pay affects productivity and employment. J Popul Econ 23(1):291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gorter K, de Poel S, de Melker R, Kuyvenhoven M (2001) Variation in diagnosis and management of common foot problems by GPs. Fam Pract 18(6):569–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen J (2000) The effect of work absence on wages and wage gaps in Sweden. J Popul Econ 13(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henningsen M, Hægeland T (2008) Downsizing as a sorting device: are low-productive workers more likely to leave downsizing firms? In: Statistics Norway discussion papers 543Google Scholar
  10. Henrekson M, Persson M (2004) The effects on sick leave of changes in the sickness insurance system. J Labor Econ 22(1):87–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hesselius P (2007) Does sickness absence increase the risk of unemployment? J Socio-Econ 36(2):288–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Høgelund J, Holm A, McIntosh J (2010) Does graded return-to-work improve sick-listed workers’ chance of returning to regular working hours? J Health Econ 29(1):158–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ichino A, Moretti E (2009) Biological gender differences, absenteeism and the earnings gap. Am Econ J Appl Econ 1(1):183–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johansson P, Palme M ( 2005) Moral hazard and sickness insurance. J Public Econ 89(9–10):1879–1890Google Scholar
  15. Malmivaara A, Häkkinen U, Aro T, Heinrichs ML, Koskenniemi L, Kuosma E, Lappi S, Paloheimo R, Servo C, Vaaranen V, Hernberg S (1995) The treatment of acute low back pain—bed rest, exercises or ordinary activity? N Engl J Med 332:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud 60(3):531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Markussen S, Mykletun A, Røed K (2010) The case for presenteeism. In: IZA discussion paper 4343Google Scholar
  18. Markussen S, Røed K, Røgeberg OJ, Gaure S (2011) The anatomy of absenteeism. J Health Econ 30(2):277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD (2008) Are all jobs good for your health? The impact of work status and working conditions on mental health. In: OECD employment outlook 2008, chapter 4. ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith JP (1999) Healthy bodies and thick wallets: the dual relation between health and economic status. J Econ Perspect 13(2):145–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Waddel G (2004) The back pain revolution, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Waddell G, Burton AK (2006) Is work good for your health and well-being? Report for Department for Work and Pensions TSO (The Stationery Office), LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Ziebarth N, Karlsson M (2010) A natural experiment on sick pay cuts, sickness absence, and labor costs. J Public Econ 94(11–12):1108–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic ResearchOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations