Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 1165–1185 | Cite as

Immigrants at new destinations: how they fare and why

  • Anabela Carneiro
  • Natércia Fortuna
  • José Varejão
Original Paper


We explore matched employer–employee data for a new destination of international migrants in Europe—Portugal. We conclude that the difference between the earnings of immigrants and natives with similar personal characteristics is for the most part due to the characteristics of the matches they form, immigrants being penalized on two different counts: absence of match-specific human capital and occupational downgrading. Moreover, we show that non-random sorting across workplaces has a significant detrimental effect on immigrants’ wages. This is the flip side of joining migrant-crowded workplaces.


Immigrants’ earnings Workplace concentration of immigrants Matched employer–employee data 

JEL Classification

J15 J61 J71 



CEF.UP—Center for Economics and Finance at University of Porto—is supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal. We would like to thank Alessandra Venturini, Barry Chiswick, Carmel Chiswick, Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes, Guillermina Jasso, Paulo Guimarães, and three anonymous referees for comments on earlier versions of the paper. Financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Research grant no. PIQS/ECO/50044/2003) is deeply appreciated. We also thank the Gabinete de Estratégia e Planeamento do Ministério do Trabalho e da Solidariedade Social, which kindly allowed us to use the data.

Supplementary material

148_2011_387_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (244 kb)
(PDF 244 KB)


  1. Adsera A, Chiswick BR (2007) Are there gender and country of origin differences in immigrant labor market outcomes across european destinations? J Popul Econ 20(3):495–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aydemir A, Skuterud M (2008) The immigrant wage differential within and across establishments. Ind Labor Relat Rev 61(3):334–352Google Scholar
  3. Borjas GJ (1999) Heaven’s door: immigration policy and the American economy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Borjas GJ (2000) Ethnic enclaves and assimilation. Swed Econ Policy Rev 7(2):89–122Google Scholar
  5. Borjas GJ (1994) The economics of immigration. J Econ Lit 32(4):1667–1717Google Scholar
  6. Calvó-Armengol A, Jackson MO (2004) The effects of social networks on employment and inequality. Am Econ Rev 94(3):426–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrington WJ, Lima PJF (1996) The impact of 1970s repatriates from Africa on the Portuguese labor market. Ind Labor Relat Rev 49(2):330–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvalho LX (2007) Os Limites da Formalidade e o Trabalho Imigrante em Portugal. ACIDI, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiswick BR (1979) The economic progress of immigrants: some apparently universal patterns. In: Fellner W (ed) Contemporary economic problems. American Enterprise Institute, Washington DC, pp 357–399Google Scholar
  10. Chiswick BR, Miller PW (2002) Immigrant earnings: language skills, linguistic concentrations and the business cycle. J Popul Econ 15(1):31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen S, Eckstein Z (2002) Labor mobility of immigrants: training, experience, language and opportunities. Int Econ Rev 49(3):837–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dustmann C, Glitz A, Schönberg U (2011) Referral-based job search networks. IZA discussion paper no. 5777Google Scholar
  13. Fontaine F (2008) Why are similar workers paid differently? the role of social networks. J Econ Dyn Control 32(12):3960–3977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckstein Z, Weiss Y (2004) On the wage growth of immigrants: Israel, 1990–2000. J Eur Econ Assoc 2(4):665–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedberg RM (2000) You can’t take it with you? Immigrant assimilation and the portability of human capital. J Labor Econ 18(2):221–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gelbach JB (2009) When do covariates matter? And which ones, and how much? University of Arizona WP, pp 09–07Google Scholar
  17. Green DA (1999) Immigrant occupational attainment and mobility over time. J Labor Econ 17(1):49–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jasso G (2008) A new unified theory of sociobehavioural forces. Eur Sociol Rev 24(4):411–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahn LM (2004) Immigration, skills and the labor market: international evidence. J Popul Econ 17(3):501–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pereira SC (2003) The impact of minimum wage on youth employment in Portugal. Eur Econ Rev 47(2):229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Portugal P, Cardoso AR (2006) Disentangling the minimum wage puzzle: an analysis of worker accessions and separations from a longitudinal matched employer-employed data set. J Eur Econ Assoc 4(5):988–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider F, Buehn A, Montenegro CE (2010) New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world. Int Econ J 24(4):443–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SOPEMI (2002) Trends in international migration. OECD Publications Service, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Venturini A (2004) Postwar migration in Southern Europe, 1950–2000. An economic analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weiss Y, Sauer RM, Gotlibovski M (2003) Immigration, search and loss of skill. J Labor Econ 21(3):221–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anabela Carneiro
    • 1
  • Natércia Fortuna
    • 1
  • José Varejão
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculdade de EconomiaUniversidade do Porto and CEF.UPPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations