Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 53–87 | Cite as

Gender wage differentials in Italy: a structural estimation approach

  • Giovanni SulisEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper studies gender wage differentials by providing a maximum likelihood structural estimation of the frictional parameters of an equilibrium search model with on-the-job search and firm heterogeneity. In a second step, I also consider the role of discrimination. Results indicate higher level of search frictions for women; this result is confirmed by various robustness checks and by different specification and estimation strategies. I also find that the resulting mapping from productivity to wages for men is highly non-linear, while for women it is almost linear. Search, productivity and discrimination play different roles in shaping the gender differential depending on the specification and estimation of the model.

Keywords

Gender differentials Equilibrium search Discrimination 

JEL Classification

J31 J41 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on Chapter 2 of my Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Essex, UK. Thanks to Melvyn Coles and Amanda Gosling for the support and advice and to Barbara Petrongolo and Michele Belot for their comments. Particular thanks also to Dale Mortensen, Bruno Contini, the editor of this journal, Jim Albrecht, and two anonymous referees for comments and suggestions that substantially improved the paper. I also thank participants at the Georgetown University Econometrics Seminar; at the Labour Market Dynamic Growth Conference in Sandbjerg, Denmark; at the Labor Market Flows, Productivity and Wage Dynamics Workshop in Turin; at the Evolution of Inequalities in Italy Workshop in Rome; at the 3rd ICEEE Conference in Ancona and at a seminar at the University of Salerno for their comments and suggestions. Financial help from the Italian Ministry of Education, PRIN Project 2005132317 “L’evoluzione delle disuguaglianze nel mercato del lavoro in Italia tra cambiamento tecnologico e modifiche istituzionali” is gratefully acknowledged. Part of the revision process of this paper was conducted while I was visiting the Department of Economics at Georgetown University; I thank that institution and the academic staff for their hospitality and the very stimulating environment. Of course, I am solely responsible for all remaining errors and misinterpretations.

References

  1. Altonji J, Blank R (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics 3C. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3143–3259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartolucci C (2009) Gender wage gaps reconsidered: a structural approach using matched employer–employee data. In: Carlo Alberto notebooks, vol 116Google Scholar
  3. Becker G (1971) The economics of discrimination, 1st edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black D (1995) Discrimination in an equilibrium search model. J Labor Econ 13(2):309–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bontemps C, Robin J-M, Van den Berg G (2000) Equilibrium search with continuous productivity dispersion: theory and non-parametric estimation. Int Econ Rev 41(2):305–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowlus A (1997) A search interpretation of male–female wage differentials. J Labor Econ 15(4):625–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowlus A, Eckstein Z (2002) Discrimination and skill differences in an equilibrium search model. Int Econ Rev 43(2):1309–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowlus A, Grogan L (2009) Gender wage differentials, job search, and part-time employment in the UK. Oxf Econ Pap 61(2):275–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burdett K, Mortensen D (1998) Wage differentials, employer size, and unemployment. Int Econ Rev 39(2):257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casavola P, Cipollone P, Sestito P (1999) Determinants of pay in the Italian labor market: jobs and workers. In: Haltiwanger J, Lane J, Spletzer J, Theeuwes J, Troske K (eds) The creation and analysis of employer–employee matched data. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 25–58Google Scholar
  11. Contini B (ed) (2002) Labour mobility and wage dynamics in Italy. Rosenberg & Sellier, TurinGoogle Scholar
  12. Del Bono E, Vuri D (2010) Job mobility and the gender wage gap in Italy. Labour Econ. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2010.06.002 Google Scholar
  13. Eckstein Z, Van den Berg G (2007) Empirical labor search: a survey. J Econom 136(2):531–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flabbi L (2010a) Gender discrimination estimation in a search model with matching and bargaining. Int Econ Rev 51(3):745–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flabbi L (2010b) Prejudice and gender differentials in the U.S. labor market in the last twenty years. J Econom 156(1):190–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flabbi L, Moro A (2010) The effect of job flexibility on women labor market outcomes: estimates from a search and bargaining model. IZA discussion paper 4829Google Scholar
  17. Jolivet G, Postel-Vinay F, Robin J-M (2006) The empirical content of the job search model: labor mobility and wage distributions in Europe and the US. Eur Econ Rev 50(4):877–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Postel-Vinay F, Robin J-M (2002) Equilibrium wage dispersion with worker and employer heterogeneity. Econometrica 70(6):2295–2350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ridder G, Van den Berg G (2003) Measuring labor market frictions: a cross-country comparison. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(1):224–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosen A (2003) Search, bargaining, and employer discrimination. J Labor Econ 21(4):807–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sasaki M (1999) An equilibrium search model with coworker discrimination. J Labor Econ 17(2):377–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sulis G (2007) Three essays in applied labour economics: wages, search and gender. Ph.D. dissertation, University of EssexGoogle Scholar
  23. Sulis G (2008) Wage dispersion and equilibrium search models: some evidence from Italy. Labour 22(4):593–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Usui E (2007) Gender occupational segregation in an equilibrium search model. SSRN working paperGoogle Scholar
  25. Van den Berg G (1999) Empirical inference with equilibrium search models of the labour market. Econ J 109(456):283–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van den Berg G, Ridder G (1998) An empirical equilibrium search model of the labor market. Econometrica 66(5):1183–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ricerche Economiche e SocialiUniversità di CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.CRENoSUniversità di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations