Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 291–321 | Cite as

The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe

  • Massimiliano Bratti
  • Konstantinos TatsiramosEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

We examine the effect of delaying motherhood on the transition to the second childbirth across European countries. There exist two opposite forces of delaying the first birth: biological and socio-cultural factors producing a postponement effect and career-related factors leading to a catch-up effect. Estimating a multistate duration model that addresses the endogeneity of age at first birth, we find a catch-up effect in countries where the career effect is large and a postponement effect in countries where the opportunity cost of childbearing is relatively high due to the lack of family friendly institutions and cultural influences, which may discourage late childbearing.

JEL Classification

C41 J13 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank three anonymous referees, Deborah Cobb-Clark, John Ermisch and Daniel Hamermesh for their very helpful comments and discussions. Earlier versions of this paper (circulated under the title “Explaining How Delayed Motherhood Affects Fertility Dynamics in Europe”, IZA DP No 3907) have also benefited from comments received at seminars at IZA, RWI-Essen, MPI in Rostock and Keele University, the BHPS Conference in Colchester, the III Workshop on ‘Economics of the Family’ in Zaragoza, the ESPE Conference in London, the EALE Conference in Amsterdam and the EEA Conference in Barcelona. The paper is partly based on work carried out by Massimiliano Bratti during his visits to the European Centre for Analysis in the Social Sciences (ECASS) at the Institute for Social and Economic Research (University of Essex) supported by the Access to Research Infrastructure action under the European Community’s ‘Improving Human Potential Programme’, and at IZA in Bonn, which are both acknowledged for their financial assistance. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Ahn N, Mira P (2002) A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. J Popul Econ 15(4):667–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amuedo-Dorantes C, Kimmel J (2005) The motherhood wage gap for women in the United States: the importance of college and fertility delay. Rev Econ Househ 3(1):17–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apps P, Rees R (2004) Fertility, taxation and family policy. Scand J Econ 106(4):745–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettio F, Villa P (1998) A Mediterranean perspective on the breakdown of the relationship between participation and fertility. Camb J Econ 22(2):137–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billari FC, Kohler H-P, Andersson G, Lundström H (2007) Approaching the limit: long-term trends in late and very late fertility. Popul Dev Rev 33(1):149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn ML, Bloom DE, Neumark D (1993) Fertility timing, wages and human capital. J Popul Econ 6(1):1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bongaarts J (2001) Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Popul Dev Rev 27(Supplement):260–281Google Scholar
  8. Bratti M (2003) Labour force participation and marital fertility of Italian women: the role of education. J Popul Econ 16(3):525–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinch CS (2007) Nonparametric identification of the mixed hazards model with time-varying covariates. Econom Theory 23(2):349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron SV, Heckman JJ (1998) Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias: models and evidence for five cohorts of American males. J Polit Econ 106(2):262–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cigno A, Ermisch JJ (1989) A microeconomic analysis of the timing of births. Eur Econ Rev 33(4):737–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Da Rocha JM, Fuster L (2006) Why are fertility rates and female employment ratios positively correlated across O.E.C.D. countries? Int Econ Rev 47(4):1187–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies R, Pierre G (2005) The family gap in pay in Europe: a cross-country study. Labour Econ 12(4):469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Del Boca D, Sauer RM (2009) Life cycle employment and fertility across institutional environments. Eur Econ Rev 53(3):274–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Del Boca D, Pasqua S, Pronzato C (2009) Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: a European perspective. Oxf Econ Pap 61(suppl. 1):i147–i171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Del Bono E, Weber A, Winter-Ebmer R (2008) Clash of career and family: fertility decisions after job displacement. IZA Discussion Paper 3272, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), BonnGoogle Scholar
  17. Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernandez R, Fogli A (2006) Culture: an empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility. Am Econ J: Macroeconomics 1(1):146–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernandez R, Fogli A (2009) Fertility: the role of culture and family experience. J Eur Econ Assoc 4(2–3):552–561Google Scholar
  20. Francesconi M (2002) A joint dynamic model of fertility and work of married women. J Labor Econ 20(2):336–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gauthier AH (2002) Family policies in industrialized countries: is thereconvergence? Population 57(2):447–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gustafsson S (2001) Optimal age at motherhood. Theoretical and empirical considerations on postponement of maternity in Europe. J Popul Econ 14(2):225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gustafsson S, Kenjoh E, Wetzels C (2002) The role of education on postponement of maternity in Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden. In: Ruspini E, Dale A (eds) The gender dimension of social change: the contribution of dynamic research to the study of women’s life courses. The Policy Press, Bristol, pp 55–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heckman JJ, Singer B (1984) The identifiability of the proportional hazard model. Rev Econ Stud 51(2):231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heckman JJ, Walker J (1990) The third birth in Sweden. J Popul Econ 3(4):235–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heckman JJ, Hotz VJ, Walker J (1985) New evidence on the timing and spacing of births. Am Econ Rev 75(2):179–184Google Scholar
  27. Hotz VJ, Miller RA (1988) An empirical analysis of life cycle fertility and female labor supply. Econometrica 56(1):91–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohler HP, Skytthe A, Christensen K (2001) The age at first birth and completed fertility reconsidered: findings from a sample of identical twins. MPIDR Working Paper 2001-006. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, RostockGoogle Scholar
  29. Kohler H, Billari FC, Ortega JA (2002) The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Popul Dev Rev 28(4):641–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lalive R, Zweimüller J (2009) Does parental leave affect fertility and return-to-work? Evidence from two natural experiments. Q J Econ 58(6):1363–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lancaster T (1990) The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Langdridge D, Blyth E (2001) Regulation of assisted conception services in Europe: implications of the new reproductive technologies for “the family”. J Soc Welf Fam Law 23(1):45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lutz W, Skirbekk V (2005) Policies addressing the tempo effect in low-fertility countries. Popul Dev Rev 31(4):699–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martínez DF, Iza A (2004) Skill premium effects on fertility and female labor force supply. J Popul Econ 17(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller A (2009) The effects of motherhood timing on career path. J Pop Econ. doi: 10.1007/s00148-009-0296-x (forthcoming)
  36. Moffitt R (1984) Profiles of fertility, labour supply and wages of married women: a complete life-cycle model. Rev Econ Stud 51(2):263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan SP, Rindfuss RR (1999) Reexamining the link of early childbearing to marriage and to subsequent fertility. Demography 36(1):59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicoletti C, Tanturri ML (2008) Differences in delaying motherhood across European countries: empirical evidence from the ECHP. Eur J Popul 24(2):157–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van den Berg GJ (2001) Duration models: specification, identification and multiple durations. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer E (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol V. North-Holland, Amsterdam (Chapter 55)Google Scholar
  40. van Ours JC (2003) Is Cannabis a stepping-stone for cocaine? J Health Econ 22(4):539–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Ours JC (2004) A pint a day raises a man’s pay; but smoking blows that gain away. J Health Econ 23(5):863–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walker JR (1995) The effect of public policies on recent Swedish fertility behavior. J Popul Econ 8(3):223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)BonnGermany
  2. 2.DEAS, Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations