Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 85–106 | Cite as

The changing intra-household resource allocation in Russia

  • Guy Lacroix
  • Natalia Radtchenko
Original Paper

Abstract

During the transition period, Russian workers witnessed important changes in their real earnings. In the process, the wage gap between men and women has varied wildly and the family decision-making process may have been significantly altered. To investigate this issue, we estimate a collective labour supply model using data from the RLMS. The specification allows the sharing rule to change in a discrete manner between the pre- and post-1998 financial crisis. Our results indicate that the parameters of the sharing-rule have shifted to a new equilibrium in the post-1998 period. Indeed, when their relative wage increases, husbands (wives) transfer relatively less (more) to their spouse than was previously the case.

Keywords

Collective model Sharing rule Russian economic crisis 

JEL Classifications

D1 J22 C5 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Thierry Kamionka and Catherine Sofer for useful comments on a preliminary version of the paper. Comments from participants at the ESPE 2006 Meeting in Verona, Italy, from the editor and two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Bloemen HG (2009) An empirical model of collective household labor supply with nonparticipation. Econ J (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Bobyleva S (2001) Doklad o razvitii chelovecheskogo potenciala, 2000 [report on the human development in the russian federation, 2000]. Technical report. Moscow, Prava ChelovekaGoogle Scholar
  3. Brainerd E (1998) Winners and losers in Russia’s economic transition. Am Econ Rev 88(5):1094–1116Google Scholar
  4. Cheidvaaser S, Benitez-Silva H (2007) The educated Russian’s curse: returns to education in the Russian federation during the 1990s. Labour 21(1):1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiappori P-A (1988) Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56:437–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiappori P-A (1992) Collective labor supply and welfare. J Polit Econ 100:437–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiappori P-A (1997) Introducing household production in collective models of labor supply. J Polit Econ 105:191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiappori P-A, Fortin B, Lacroix G (2002) Marriage market, divorce legislation and household labor supply. J Polit Econ 110:37–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donni O (2003) Collective household labor supply: non-participation and income taxation. J Public Econ 87:1179–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donni O (2008) Labor supply, home production and welfare comparisons. J Public Econ 92(7):1720–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortin B, Lacroix G, Villeval MC (2007) Tax evasion and social interactions. J Public Econ 91:2089–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fortin B, Dauphin A, El Lhaga A-R, Lacroix G (2008) Assessing the number of household decision-makers. W.P. 3738. IZAGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerry CJ, Li CA, Kim B-Y (2004) The gender wage gap and wage arrears in Russia: evidence from the RLMS. J Popul Econ 17(2):267–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glinskaya E, Mroz TA (2000) The gender gap in wages in Russia from 1992 to 1995. J Popul Econ 13(2):353–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goskomstat Rossii (1999) Socialnoe polozjenie i uroven zjizni naselenija rossii [the social condition and living standards of the population in russia]. Statisticheskij Bulleten [Stat Bull]Google Scholar
  16. Goskomstat Rossii (2005) Russia in numbers. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  17. Gourieroux C, Laffont J-J, Monfort A (1980) Coherency conditions in simultaneous linear equations models with endogenous switching regimes. Econometrica 48:675–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grogan L (2006) Social transfers and intrahousehold resource allocation: evidence from Russia. Mimeo, University of GuelphGoogle Scholar
  19. Heckman J, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52:271–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoynes H (1996) Welfare transfers in two-parent families: labor supply and welfare participation under AFDC-UP. Econometrica 64:295–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalugina E, Radtchenko N, Sofer C (2009) How do spouses share their full income? Identification of the sharing rule using self-reported income. Rev Income Wealth 55(2):360–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lacroix G, Fortin B (1992) Utility-based estimation of labour supply functions in the regular and irregular sectors. Econ J 102:1407–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lacroix G, Radtchenko N (2008) The changing intra-household resource allocation in Russia. IZA DP. No. 3733Google Scholar
  24. Lokshin M, Ravallion M (2000) Welfare impacts of Russia’s 1998 financial crisis and the response of the public safety net. Econ Transit 8:269–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lokshin M, Yemtsov R (2001) Household strategies for coping with poverty and social exclusion in post-crisis Russia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper N2556Google Scholar
  26. Michaud P-C, Vermeulen F (2006) A collective labor supply model: identification and estimation in the presence of externalities by means of panel data. RAND Labor and Population Program WR-406Google Scholar
  27. Mroz TA, Popkin BM (1995) Poverty and the economic transition in the Russian federation. Econ Dev Cult Change 44(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Radtchenko N (2006) Offre de travail individuel et collective: applications empiriques à l’aide de données russes. PhD dissertation, Université Paris I-Panthéon-SorbonneGoogle Scholar
  29. Radtchenko N (2009) Identifying intra-household welfare distribution. EPEE Working Paper, 2009-04Google Scholar
  30. Thomas D, Stillman S (2008) The effect of economic crises on nutritional status: evidence from Russia. Econ J 118(531):1385–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vermeulen F, Cherchye L, De Rock B (2005) Opening the black box of intra-household decision-making: theory and non-parametric empirical tests of general collective consumption models. Center Discussion Paper, 2005-51Google Scholar
  32. Vermeulen F, Cherchye L, De Rock B, Sabbe J (2008) Nonparametric tests of collectively rational consumption behavior: an integer programming procedure. J Econom 147:258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IZA, CIRPÉEUniversité LavalQuebec CityCanada
  2. 2.Département d’économieUniversité d’Evry-Val-d’EssonneEvry CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations