Gibrat’s law for countries
A reassessment of Gibrat’s Law in the context of country size is carried out in this paper. In addition, how similarly population is distributed in cities and countries is analyzed from a temporal perspective. Although evidence of Gibrat’s Law is found, it is weaker than that previously established in Rose (J Money Credit Bank 38(8):2225–2246, 2006). This is due to the methodology applied and is especially appreciable in very small countries. Nonetheless, we observe that the population growth process in countries is similar to that of cities. As a result, the similarities between how the population is distributed in these two geographical categories have increased over time.
KeywordsGirat’s law Country size
JEL ClassificationC12 F00 R12
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Córdoba JC (2008) A generalized Gibrat’s Law for cities. Int Econ Rev 49(4):1463–1468Google Scholar
- Di Guilmi C, Gaffeo E, Gallegati M (2003) Power law scaling in the world income distribution. Econ Bull 15(6):1–7Google Scholar
- Eeckhout J (2009) Gibrat’s Law for (all) Cities: reply. Am Econ Rev (in press)Google Scholar
- Gabaix X, Iaonnides YM (2004) The evolution of city size distributions. In: Henderson JV, Thisse, JF (eds) Handbook of urban and regional economics 4A. North-Holland Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 2341–2378Google Scholar
- Gabaix X, Ibragimov R (2007) Rank-1/2: a simple way to improve OLS estimation of tail exponents. NBER technical working paper no 342Google Scholar
- Gibrat R (1931) Les inégalités économiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo working paper series no 1229Google Scholar
- Zipf GK (1949) Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Addison-Wesley, CambridgeGoogle Scholar