Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 517–536 | Cite as

Understanding the link between the economy and teenage sexual behavior and fertility outcomes

  • Jeremy ArkesEmail author
  • Jacob Alex Klerman
Original Paper

Abstract

We use individual-level data from the 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and state unemployment rates to examine how the economy affects fertility and its proximate determinants for several groups based on gender, age (15–17 and 18–20 groups), and race/ethnicity. We find that, for 15- to 17-year-old females, several behaviors leading to pregnancies and pregnancies themselves are higher when the unemployment rate is higher, which is consistent with the counter-cyclical fertility patterns for this group. For 18- to 20-year-old males, the results suggested counter-cyclical patterns of fertility behaviors/outcomes for whites, but pro-cyclical patterns for blacks.

Keywords

Fertility Sexual behavior Contraception 

JEL Classifications

J11 J13 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Phillip Levine for providing data on abortion laws, Paul Steinberg for editorial assistance, Chris Dirks for formatting assistance, and the helpful comments from two anonymous referees.

References

  1. Arkes J (2007) Does the economy affect teenage substance use? Health Econ 16(1):19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119(1):249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butz WP, Ward MP (1979) The emergence of countercyclical U.S. fertility. Am Econ Rev 69(3):318–328Google Scholar
  4. Chamberlain G (1984) Panel data. In: Griliches Z, Intrilligator M (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol 2. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1247–1318Google Scholar
  5. Cooper ML, Shapiro CM, Powers AM (1998) Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: a functional perspective. J Pers Soc Psychol 75(6):1528–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hotz JV, Klerman JA, Willis R (1997) The economics of fertility in developed countries. In: Rosenzweig R, Stark O (eds) Handbook of population and family economics, vol 1A. Elsevier, North-Holland, pp 275–347Google Scholar
  7. Jones E, Forest J (1992) Underreporting of abortions in surveys of U.S. Women: 1976–1988. Demography 29(1):113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klerman JA, Danielson C (2004) Why did the welfare caseload decline? RAND Working Paper, WR-167Google Scholar
  9. Krämer W, Neusser K (1984) The emergence of countercyclical U.S. fertility. Am Econ Rev 74(1):201–202Google Scholar
  10. Levine PB (2001) The sexual activity and birth-control use of American teenagers. In: Gruber J (ed) Risky behavior among youths: an economic analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 167–217Google Scholar
  11. Levine PB (2002) The impact of social policy and economic activity throughout the fertility decision tree. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9021.Google Scholar
  12. Macunovich DJ (1995) The butz-ward fertility model in the light of more recent data. The J Hum Resour 30(2):229–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin J, Hamilton B, Sutton P, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson M (2003) Births: final data for 2002. National Vital Statistics System 52(10)Google Scholar
  14. McDonald J (1983) The emergence of countercyclical U.S. fertility: a reassessment of the evidence. J Macroecon 5(4):421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moulton B (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Rev Econ Stat 72(2):334–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Office of the President of the United States (2004) Economic report of the president. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Sen B (2002) Does alcohol-use increase the risk of sexual intercourse among adolescents? Evidence from the NLSY97. J Health Econ 21(6):1085–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ventura S, Abma J, Mosher WD, Henshaw S (2004) Estimated pregnancy rates for the United States, 1990–2000: an Update. National Vital Statistics System 52(23)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Naval Postgraduate School/Code GBMontereyUSA
  2. 2.Abt Associates IncCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations