Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 805–832 | Cite as

The mismatch between employment and child care in Italy: the impact of rationing

  • Daniela Del Boca
  • Daniela Vuri
OriginalPaper

Abstract

In Italy the women’s participation is among the lowest in Europe. The female employment rate stands almost 13 percentage points below the EU average and 22 below the Lisbon target. One of the most important reasons is related to the characteristics of child care system. We analyze the characteristics of the child care system in Italy and its relationship to the labor market participation decision of mothers. The two decisions are jointly considered in a discrete choice framework, which also allows for simple forms of rationing. We go on to estimate a bivariate probit model of the child care and employment decisions and find evidence that rationing is an important factor in interpreting price effects on utilization rates and employment decisions.

Keywords

Labor market decisions Fertility Child care 

JEL

J2 C3 D1 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Averett SL, Peters HE, Waldman D (1997) Tax credits labor supply and child care. Rev Econ Stat 79(1):125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bank of Italy Survey (1998) The survey on household income and wealth. Bank of ItalyGoogle Scholar
  3. Blau DM, Robins PK (1988) Child care costs and family labor supply. Rev Econ Stat 70(3): 374–38Google Scholar
  4. Boeri T, Del Boca D, Pissarides C (2005) Women at work: an economic perspective. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Cannari L, Nucci F, Sestito P (2000) Geographic labour mobility and the cost of housing: evidence from Italy. Appl Econ 32(14):1899–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiuri MC (2000) Quality and demand of child care and female labour supply in Italy. Labour 14:97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cigno A (1991) Economics of the family. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobb CD, Mitchel D, Mitchel AM (2000) Reassessing the role of child care costs in the work and care decisions of Australian families. Aust Bull Labour 26(4):197–215Google Scholar
  9. Connelly R (1992) The effect of child care costs on married women’s labor force participation. Rev Econ Stat 74(1):83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehejia R, Wahba S (1999) Causal effects in non-experimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. JASA 94(448):1053–1062Google Scholar
  11. Dehejia R, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Rev Econ Stat 84:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Del Boca D (1993) Offerte di Lavoro e politiche pubbliche. Roma, Nuova Italia ScientificaGoogle Scholar
  13. Del Boca D (2002) The effects of child care and part time on the participation and fertility decisions of married women. J Popul Econ 15(3):549–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Del Boca D, Locatelli M, Vuri D (2005) Child care choices of Italian households. Rev Econ Househ 3:453–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ermisch JF (1989) Purchased child care, optimal family size and mother’s employment: theory and econometric analysis. J Popul Econ 2:79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrera M (1996) The southern model in social europe. J Eur Soc Policy 6(1):17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fondazione degli Innocenti (2002) I servizi educativi per la prima infanzia. Quaderno 21Google Scholar
  18. Gornick JC, Meyers MK, Ross KE (1997) Supporting the employment of mothers: policy variation across fourteen welfare states. J Eur Soc Policy 7(1):43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gustafsson S, Stafford F (1992) Child care subsidies and labor supply in Sweden. J Hum Resour 2:204–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heckman JJ (1974) The effect of child care programs on women work effort. J Polit Econ 82(2):136–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckman JJ (1993) What has been learned about labor supply in the past twenty years. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 83(2):116–121Google Scholar
  23. ISTAT (1998a) Indagine sulle forze lavoro, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaumotte F (2003) Labour force participation of women: empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in OECD countries, OECD Economic Studies 37, OECDGoogle Scholar
  25. Jenkins S, Symons E (2001) Child care costs and lone mothers’ employment rates: UK evidence. Manch Sch 69:121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kimmel J (1998) Child care costs as a barrier to employment for single and married mothers. Rev Econ Stat 80(2):287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kornstad T, Thoresen TO (2002) A discrete choice model for labor supply and child care. DP 315 Statistics Norway Research DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  28. Kreyenfeld M, Hank K (1999) The availability of child care and mothers’ employment in West Germany. DIW Discussion Paper 191, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Meulders D, Plasman O, Plasman R (eds) (1994) Atypical employment in the EC. Aldershot, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD (2001) Employment outlook 2001, ParisGoogle Scholar
  31. Powell L (1997) The impact of child care costs on labour supply of married mothers: evidence from canada. Can J Econ 30(3):577–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Powell L (1998) Part time versus full time work and child care costs: evidence for married mothers. Appl Econ 30(4):503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ribar D (1992) Child care and the labour supply of married women: reduced form evidence. J Hum Resour 27(1):135–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ribar D (1995) A structural model of child care and the labour supply of married women. J Labour Econ 13(3):558–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosen S (1995) Public employment, taxes and the welfare state in sweden. NBER wp. n.5003Google Scholar
  36. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Viitanen T (2005) Costs of child care and female employment in england. Labour 19:149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wrohlich K (2004) Child care costs and mothers’ labor supply: an empirical analysis for Germany, DIW Discussion Papers 412, German Institute for Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  2. 2.SEFEMEQ Department, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  3. 3.CESifoMunichGermany
  4. 4.Collegio Carlo AlbertoMoncalieriItaly
  5. 5.CHILDTurinItaly
  6. 6.IZABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations