Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 73–100 | Cite as

Do youth nonmarital childbearing choices reflect income and relationship expectations?

  • Barbara Wolfe
  • Robert Haveman
  • Karen Pence
  • Jonathan A. Schwabish
OriginalPaper

Abstract

We hypothesize that teen nonmarital birth events are influenced by adolescent girls’ perceptions of the consequences of their choices. Two such consequences are explored: (1) a teen’s expected future marriage and cohabitation relationships and (2) the present value of expected future income. We also measure the effects of the characteristics of the teen, her prior choices, her family, her neighborhood, and the social and economic environment in which she lives. The results, based on the Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics, suggest that teens place greater weight on the relationship consequences than the income consequences, but that both consequences influence their nonmarital birth choices.

Keywords

Teen births Nonmarital fertility Family planning 

JEL Classifications

J13 J10 

References

  1. Angrist J, Krueger A (1995) Split sample instrument variables estimates of the return to schooling. J Bus Econ Stat 13(2):225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker G (1974) A theory of marriage: part II. J Polit Econ 82(2):S11–S26 (March–April)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker G, Landes E, Michael R (1977) An economic analysis of marital instability. J Polit Econ 85(6):1141–1187 (December)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becketti S, Gould W, Lillard L, Welch F (1988) The PSID after fourteen years: an evaluation. J Labor Econ 6(4):472–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bound J, Jaeger D, Baker R (1995) Problems with instrumental variable estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J Am Stat Assoc 90(430):443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bronars SG, Grogger J (1994) The economic consequences of unwed motherhood: using twin births as a natural experiment. Am Econ Rev 84(5):1141–1156Google Scholar
  7. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan G, Klebanov PK, Sealand N (1993) Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent behavior. Am J Sociol 99(2):353–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bumpass L, Lu H-h (2000) Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the U.S. Popul Stud 54(1):29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bumpass L, Sweet J (1989) National estimates of cohabitation. Demography 24(4):615–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bumpass LL, Sweet JA, Cherlin A (1991) The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. J Marriage Fam 53(4):913–927 (November)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke G, Strauss R (1998) Children as income producing assets: the case of teen illegitimacy and government transfers. South Econ J 64(4):827–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corcoran M, Adams T (1997) Race, sex and the intergenerational transmission of poverty. In: Duncan G, Brooks-Gunn J (ed) Consequences of growing up poor. Russell Sage, New York, pp 461–517Google Scholar
  13. Datcher L (1982) Effects of community and family backgrounds on achievement. Rev Econ Stat 64:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan G, Hoffman S (1990) Welfare benefits, economic opportunities, and out-of-wedlock births among Black teenage girls. Demography 27(4):519–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald J, Gottschalk P, Moffitt R (1998) An analysis of sample attrition in panel data: the Michigan panel study of income dynamics. J Hum Resour 33(2):251–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geronimous A, Korenman S (1992) The socioeconomic consequences of teen childbearing reconsidered. Q J Econ CVII:1187–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geronimous A, Korenman S (1993) The socioeconomic costs of teenage childbearing: evidence and interpretation. Demography 30(2):281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S, Sutton P, Menacker F (2005) Births: preliminary data for 2004. National Vital Statistical Reports 54:8. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  19. Haveman R, Wolfe B (1994) Succeeding generations: on the effects of investments in children. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Haveman R, Wolfe B (1995) The determinants of children's attainments: a review of methods and findings. J Econ Lit 33(4):1829–1878Google Scholar
  21. Haveman R, Wolfe B, Peterson E (1996) Children of young childbearers as young adults. In: Maynard R (ed) Kids having kids: economic costs and social consequences of teen pregnancy. Urban Institute Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Haveman R, Wolfe B, Pence K (2001a) Intergenerational effects of non-marital and early childbearing. In: Wu L, Wolfe B (ed) Out of wedlock: causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility. Russell Sage, New York, pp 287–316Google Scholar
  23. Haveman R, Wolfe B, Wilson K (2001b) The role of economic incentives in teenage nonmarital childbearing choices. J Public Econ 81:473–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haveman R, Sandefur G, Voyear A, Wolfe B (2004) Trends in children’s attainments and their determinants as family income inequality has increased. In: Neckerman K (ed) Social inequality. Russell Sage, New York, NY, pp 149–188Google Scholar
  25. Heckman JA (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 4(1):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffman SD, Foster EM (1999) AFDC benefits and nonmarital births to young women. J Hum Resour 35(2):376–391 (Spring 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffman SD, Foster EM, Furstenberg F (1993) Reevaluating the costs of teenage childbearing. Demography 30(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hotz VJ, McElroy S, Sanders S (1997a) The impacts of teenage childbearing on the mothers and the consequences of those impacts for government. In: Maynard R (ed) Kids having kids: economic costs and social consequences of teen pregnancy. Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC, pp 55–94Google Scholar
  29. Hotz VJ, Mullins C, Sanders S (1997b) Bounding caused effects using data from a contaminated natural experiment analyzing the effects of teenage childbearing. Rev Econ Stud 64(4):575–603 (October)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hotz VJ, McElroy S, Sanders S (1999) Teenage childbearing and its life cycle consequences: exploiting a natural experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 7397, NBER, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoynes HW (1997) Does welfare play any role in female headship decisions? J Public Econ 65:89–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson J, DiNardo J (1997) Econometric methods, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Kalil A, Kunz J (1999) First births among unmarried adolescent girls: risk and protective factors. Soc Work Res 23(3):197–208Google Scholar
  35. Lee L-F (1979) Identification estimation in binary choice models with limited (censored) dependent variable. Econometrica 47(4):977–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lillard LA, Panis CWA (1994) Attrition from the PSID: household income, marital status, and mortality. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  37. Long JS, Freese J (2006) Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd edn. Stata PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Lundberg S, Plotnick R (1995) Adolescent premarital childbearing: do economic incentives matter? J Labor Econ 13(2):177–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manski C (1987) Academic ability, earnings, and the decision to become a teacher: evidence from the national longitudinal study of the high school class of 1972. In: Wise DA (ed) Public sector payrolls. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  40. Maynard R (ed) (1997) Kids having kids: the costs and consequences of teen childbearing. Urban Institute Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. McElroy M (1985) The joint determination of household membership and market work: the case of young men. J Labor Econ 3(3):293–316 (July)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moffitt R (1994) Welfare effects on female headship with area effects. J Hum Resour 29(2):621–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moffitt R (1998) The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility. In: Moffitt R (ed) Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior: research perspectives. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 50–97Google Scholar
  44. Mosher W, Bachrach C (1996) Understanding the U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the national survey of family growth, 1988–1995. Fam Plann Perspect 28:4–11 (January/February)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenzweig MR (1999) Welfare, marital prospects and nonmarital childbearing. J Polit Econ 107(6):S3–S32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenzweig M, Wolpin K (1995) Sisters, siblings, and mothers: the effect of teen-age childbearing on birth outcomes in a dynamic family context. Econometrica 63(2):303–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Upchurch D, Lillard LA, Panis CWA (2002) Nonmarital childbearing: influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography 39(2):311–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ventura SJ, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ (2000) Variations in teenage birth rates, 1991–98: National and State Trends. National Vital Statistics Report 48:6. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvs48_6.pdf
  49. Wolfe B, McHugh E (2006) Health and medical care costs to society of teenage childbearing: children from birth to age 14. Mimeograph, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolfe B, Perozek M (1996) Teen children’s health and health care use. In: Maynard R (ed) Kids having kids: economic costs and social consequences of teen pregnancy. Urban Institute Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Wolfe
    • 1
  • Robert Haveman
    • 1
  • Karen Pence
    • 2
  • Jonathan A. Schwabish
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Federal Reserve BoardWashington DCUSA
  3. 3.US Congressional Budget OfficeWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations