Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 3–24 | Cite as

Does family policy affect fertility?

Lessons from Sweden
  • Anders BjörklundEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

From the mid-1960s to around 1980, Sweden extended its family policies that provide financial and in-kind support to families with children very quickly. The benefits were closely tied to previous work experience. Thus, women born in the 1950s faced markedly different incentives when making fertility choices compared to women born only 15–20 years earlier. This paper examines the evolution of completed fertility patterns for Swedish women born in 1925–1958 and makes comparisons to women in neighbouring countries where the policies were not extended as much as in Sweden. The results suggest that the extension of the policy raised the level of fertility, shortened the spacing of births, and induced fluctuations in the period fertility rates, but it did not change the negative relationship between women’s educational level and completed fertility.

Keywords

Fertility Family policy Comparative studies 

JEL Classification

J13 J18 D13 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This is a revised and updated version of my presidential address at the ESPE-2001 meetings in Athens. I am grateful to several national experts for help and advice with data collection for this paper. By country, these are Belgium, Ron Lesthaeghe; Denmark, Lisbeth Knudsen, Jørn Korsbø Petersen and Nina Smith; France, Fabienne Daguet; Germany, Michaela Kreyenfeld and Thorsten Schneider; Netherlands, Gijs Beets and Jan Latten; Norway, Helge Brunnborg and Trude Lappegård; and Sweden, Gun Alm-Stenflo and Elisabeth Landgren-Möller. I also thank Gunnar Andersson, Thomas Aronsson, Lena Edlund, Jan Hoem, Per Molander, Marianne Sundström, and Mårten Palme for many valuable discussions about the paper’s topics. Three referees provided most valuable comments. Despite all help and suggestions, the usual disclaimer applies. Swedish Council for Social Research and Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research provided financial support.

References

  1. Angrist JD, Krueger AB (1999) Empirical strategies in labor economics. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3A. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Birg H, Filip D, Flöthmann E-J (1990) Paritätsspezifische Kohortenanalyse des generativen Verhaltens in der Bundesrepuplik Deutschland nach dem 2. Welkrieg. IBS-Materialen Nr. 30. Institut für Bevölkerungsforschung und Sozialpolitik, Universität Bielefeld, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosveld W (1996) The aging of fertility in Europe. A comparative demographic-analytic study, PDOD. Thesis, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunborg H, Mamelund S-E (1994) Kohort-og periodefruktbarhet i Norge 1820–1993. Rapporter 94/27 SSB, OsloGoogle Scholar
  5. Council of Europe (2001) Recent demographic developments in Europe 2001. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  6. Council of Europe (2003) Recent demographic developments in Europe 2003. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  7. Daguet F (2000) L’évolution de la fécondité des générations nées de 1917 à 1949: analyse par rang de naissance et niveau de diplôme. Population 2000(6):1021–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ermisch J (1989) Purchased child care, optimal family size and mother’s employment. J Popul Econ 2:79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gauthier AH (1996) The state and the family: a comparative analysis of family policies in industrialised countries. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Gustafsson S (2001) Optimal age at motherhood. Theoretical and empirical considerations on postponement of maternity in Europe. J Popul Econ 14:225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heckman J, Walker J (1990) The relationship between wages and income and the timing and spacing of births: evidence from Swedish longitudinal data. Econometrica 58:1411–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoem JM (1993) Public policy as the fuel of fertility. Acta Sociol 36:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoem B, Hoem JM (1997) Sweden’s family policies and roller-coaster fertility. J Popul Problems 52:1–22Google Scholar
  14. Hotz VJ, Klerman JA, Willis RJ (1997) The economics of fertility in developed countries. In: Rosenzweig MR, Stark O (eds) Handbook of population and family economics. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Klevmarken A (1993) Demographics and the dynamics of earnings. J Popul Econ 6:105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lappegård T (2000) New fertility trends in Norway. Demographic Research, vol 2/3. http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol2/3
  17. Rönsen M, Sundström M (2002) Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers—a comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. Eur J Popul 18:121–152Google Scholar
  18. Sainsbury D (1996) Gender equality and welfare states. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Schultz TP (2001) The fertility transition: economic explanations. In Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. SOU (1989) Arbetstid och välfärd. Betänkande av arbetstidskommittén. SOU 1989:53Google Scholar
  21. Sundström M, Dufvander A-Z (2002) Family division of child care and the sharing of parental leave among new parents in Sweden. Eur Sociol Rev 18(4):433–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walker JR (1995) The effect of public policies on recent Swedish fertility behavior. J Popul Econ 8:223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wennemo I (1994) Sharing the costs of children. Dissertation series no. 25, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, StockholmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI)Stockholm UniversityStocholmSweden

Personalised recommendations