Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Decentered ethics in the machine era and guidance for AI regulation

  • Christian Hugo HoffmannEmail author
  • Benjamin Hahn
Open Forum
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Recent advancements in AI have prompted a large number of AI ethics guidelines published by governments and nonprofits. While many of these papers propose concrete or seemingly applicable ideas, few philosophically sound proposals are made. In particular, we observe that the line of questioning has often not been examined critically and underlying conceptual problems not always dealt with at the root. In this paper, we investigate the nature of ethical AI systems and what their moral status might be by first turning to the notions of moral agency and patience. We find that their explication would come at a too high cost which is why we, second, articulate a different approach that avoids vague and ambiguous concepts or the problem of other minds. Third, we explore the impact of our philosophical and conceptual analysis on the regulatory landscape, make this link explicit, and finally propose a set of promising policy steps.

Keywords

AI ethics Decentralization Moral status Moral patiency Regulations 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.

References

  1. Birch TH (1993) Moral considerability and universal consideration. Environ Ethics 15:313–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bostrom N (2016) Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Channell DF (1991) The vital machine: a study of technology and organic life. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Coeckelbergh M (2018) What do we mean by a relational ethics? Growing a relational approach to the moral standing of plants, robots and other non-humans. In: Kallhoff A, Di Paola M, Schörgenhumer M (eds) Plant ethics. Routledge, London, pp 110–121Google Scholar
  5. Dräger J, Müller-Eiselt R (2019) Wir und die Intelligenten Maschinen. Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunn A (2019) When hype is harmful: why what we think is possible matters. Medium. https://medium.com/swlh/whenhype-is-harmful-why-what-we-think-is-possible-matters-e7988db6f643
  7. European Laboratory for Learning and Intelligent Systems (ELLIS) (2019) Letter. https://ellis.eu/letter. Accessed 03 Oct 2019
  8. Financial Times (2019) EU publishes guidelines on ethical artificial intelligence. https://www.ft.com/content/32032c8a-5a0b-11e9-9dde-7aedca0a081a. Accessed 24 Jun 2019
  9. Fischer S, Wenger A (2019) Ein neutraler Hub für KI-Forschung. In: Policy perspectives, vol 7/2. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich. https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/PP7-2_2019-D.pdf. Accessed 03 Oct 2019
  10. Floridi L (1999) Information ethics: on the philosophical foundation of computer ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 1:37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Floridi L (2010) Information ethics. In: Floridi L (ed) Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Floridi L, Sanders JW (2004) On the morality of artificial agents. Mind Mach 14:349–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gal D (2019) Perspectives and approaches in AI ethics: East Asia. In: Dubber M, Pasquale F, Das S (eds) Oxford handbook of ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Good IJ (1965) The mystery of go. The New Scientist, pp 172–174Google Scholar
  15. Hajdin M (1994) The boundaries of moral discourse. Loyola University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanson FA (2009) Beyond the skin bag: on the moral responsibility of extended agencies. Ethics Inf Technol 11:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hao K (2019) We analyzed 16,625 papers to figure out where AI is headed next. MIT technology review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612768/we-analyzed-16625-papers-to-figure-out-where-ai-is-headed-next/. Accessed 24 Jun 2019
  18. Harrison P (1992) Descartes on animals. Philos Quart 167:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology. In: Lovitt W (ed) The question concerning technology and other essays. Harper & Row, New York, pp 3–35Google Scholar
  20. High-Level Expert Group on AI (AI HLEG) (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation/guidelines. Accessed 03 Oct 2019
  21. Hoffmann CH (2017) Structure-based explanatory modeling of risks. Towards understanding dynamic complexity in financial systems. Syst Res Behav Sci 34:728–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Introna LD (2009) Ethics and the speaking of things. Theory Culture Society 26:398–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E (2019) The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell 1:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kierkegaard S (1987) Either/or, part 2. Trans. Hong HV, Hong EH. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near. When humans transcend biology. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Levy D (2009) The Ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots. Int J Social Robot 1:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacDorman KF, Cowley SJ (2006) Long-term relationships as a benchmark for robot personhood. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot human interaction communication, pp 378–383Google Scholar
  28. Mulgan G (2019) AI ethics and the limits of code(s). NESTA. https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/ai-ethics-and-limits-codes. Accessed 29 Sept 2019
  29. Müller VC (2019) Policy documents & institutions—ethical, legal and socio-economic issues of robotics and artificial intelligence. http://www.pt-ai.org/TG-ELS/policy. Accessed 24 Jun 2019
  30. Noothigattu R, Gaikwad S, Awad E, Dsouza S, Rahwan I, Ravikumar P, Procaccia AD (2017) A voting-based system for ethical decision making. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.06692
  31. Putnam H (1964) Robots: machines or artificially created life? J Philos 61:668–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Regan T (1983) The case for animal rights. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  33. Savva M, Kadian A, Maksymets O, Zhao Y, Wijmans E, Jain B, Straub J, Liu J, Koltun V, Malik J, Parikh D (2019) Habitat: a platform for embodied AI research. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01201
  34. Singer P (1975) Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York Review of Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Sparrow R (2004) The turing triage test. Ethics Inf Technol 6:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spindler C, Hoffmann CH (2019) Data logistics and AI in insurance risk management. International Data Spaces Association. https://www.internationaldataspaces.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IDSA-paper-Data-Logistics-and-AI-in-Insurance-Risk-Management.pdf. Accessed 03 Oct 2019
  37. Städeli M (2019) In Zürich entsteht eine breite Allianz für Superdrohnen und Roboter. Zurich: NZZ am Sonntag. https://nzzas.nzz.ch/wirtschaft/kuenstliche-intelligenz-zuerich-soll-schweiz-voran-bringen-ld.1497241. Accessed 03 Oct 2019
  38. Stahl BC (2006) Responsible computers? A case for ascribing quasi-responsibility to computers independent of personhood or agency. Ethics Inf Technol 8:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stix C (2019) A survey of the European Union’s artificial intelligence ecosystem. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/ff3afe_1513c6bf2d81400eac182642105d4d6f.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2019
  40. SwissCognitive (2019) CognitiveValley: ready for take off! www.swisscognitive.ch/2019/08/31/cognitivevalley_is_being-born/. Accessed 03 Oct 2019
  41. Techcrunch (2017) Techcrunch, 2017. Saudi Arabia bestows citizenship on a robot named Sophia. https://techcrunch.com/2017/10/26/saudi-arabia-robot-citizen-sophia/. Accessed 24 Jun 2019
  42. The Federal Council (2018) The pros and cons of artificial intelligence. https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start/documentation/media-releases.msg-id-71639.html. Accessed 24 Jun 2019
  43. The Guardian (2011) John McCarthy obituary. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/oct/25/john-mccarthy. Accessed 24 Jun 2019
  44. Towards Data Science (2018) Deep learning for self-driving cars using Nvidia’s research to build a CNN for autonomous driving in Pytorch. https://towardsdatascience.com/deep-learning-for-self-driving-cars-7f198ef4cfa2. Accessed 24 Jun 2019
  45. Vinge V (1993) The coming technological singularity. In: Grüter T (ed) Klüger als wir? Auf dem Weg zur Hyperintelligenz. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallach W, Allen C (2009) Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walsh T (2017) It’s alive. Edition Körber, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  48. Weber K (2019) Autonomie und Moralität als Zuschreibung. In: Rath M, Krotz F, Karmasin M (eds) Maschinenethik. Ethik in mediatisierten Welten. Springer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  49. WIRED (2018) The AI cargo cult. The Myth of a Superhuman AI. https://www.wired.com/2017/04/the-myth-of-a-superhuman-ai/. Accessed 24 Jun 2019
  50. Žižek S (2006) The parallax view. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Entrepreneurial RisksETH Risk CenterZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Autonomous Systems LabETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations