God-like robots: the semantic overlap between representation of divine and artificial entities
- 78 Downloads
Artificial intelligence and robots may progressively take a more and more prominent place in our daily environment. Interestingly, in the study of how humans perceive these artificial entities, science has mainly taken an anthropocentric perspective (i.e., how distant from humans are these agents). Considering people’s fears and expectations from robots and artificial intelligence, they tend to be simultaneously afraid and allured to them, much as they would be to the conceptualisations related to the divine entities (e.g., gods). In two experiments, we investigated the proximity of representation between artificial entities (i.e., artificial intelligence and robots), divine entities and natural entities (i.e., humans and other animals) at both an explicit (Study 1) and an implicit level (Study 2). In the first study, participants evaluated these entities explicitly on positive and negative attitudes. Hierarchical clustering analysis showed that participants’ representation of artificial intelligence, robots and divine entities were similar, while the representation of humans tended to be associated with that of animals. In the second study, participants carried out a word/non-word decision task including religious semantic-related words and neutral words after the presentation of a masked prime referring to divine entities, artificial entities and natural entities (or a control prime). Results showed that after divine and artificial entity primes, participants were faster to identify religious words as words compared to neutral words arguing for a semantic activation. We conclude that people make sense of the new entities by relying on already familiar entities and in the case of artificial intelligence and robots, people appear to draw parallels to divine entities.
Artificial Intelligence and robots share common representations with divine entities (e.g., gods).
Artificial Intelligence and robots, similar to divine entities, are conceptualized as non-natural entities with high power over human life.
These common representations rely on conceptual semantic proximity at the explicit and implicit level.
KeywordsArtificial intelligence Robots Gods Semantic representation Perception of robots
Authors thank Natalia Martinelli and Jordan Chambas for the assistance with data collection and Thia Sagherian-Dickey for helpful comments on the manuscript.
- Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ (2006) Visual word recognition: the journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In: Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, pp 285–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50010-9
- Bostrom N (2003) Ethical issues in advanced artificial intelligence. Science fiction and philosophy: from time travel to superintelligence, pp 277–284Google Scholar
- Brown JD (2002) The Cronbach alpha reliability estimate. JALT Test Eval SIG Newsl 6(1):17–19Google Scholar
- Durkheim E (1912) Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse [The elementary forms of religious life]. Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Echterhoff G, Bohner G, Siebler F (2006) “Social Robotics” und Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion. Aktuelle Forschung und Relevanz fuer die Sozialpsychologie., social robotics and human-machine interaction: current research and relevance for social psychology. Zeitschrift Fuer Sozialpsychologie. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-35220.127.116.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D (2011) Manipulating anthropomorphic inferences about NAO: The role of situational and dispositional aspects of effectance motivation. In: Proceedings—IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005233
- Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D, Hegel F, De Ruiter L (2012) Activating elicited agent knowledge: how robot and user features shape the perception of social robots. In: Proceedings—IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343858
- Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings—IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, PP 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251796
- Häring M, Kuchenbrandt D, André E (2014) Would you like to play with me? In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction—HRI’14, pp 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559673
- Hegel F, Krach S, Kircher T, Wrede B, Sagerer G (2008) Understanding social robots: a user study on anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN, pp 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600728
- Mlynář J, Alavi HS, Verma H, Cantoni L (2018) Towards a sociological conception of artificial intelligence. Artificial general intelligence: 11th International Conference, AGI 2018, pp 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97676-1_13
- Nass C, Reeves B, Leshner G (1996) Technology and roles: a tale of two TVs. J Commun 46(2):121–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01477.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- New B., Pallier C., Ferrand L., & Matos R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année Psychologique Google Scholar
- Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T, Kato K (2005) Psychology in human-robot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots. RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog no. 04TH8759), pp 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/roman.2004.1374726
- Nomura T, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Kato K (2006b) Altered attitudes of people toward robots: investigation through the negative attitudes toward robots scale. In: Proceedings AAAI-06 Workshop on Human Implications of Human-Robot Interaction, (Chaplin 1991), pp 29–35. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2006/WS-06-09/WS06-09-006.pdf
- Nowak KL, Rauh C (2005) The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. J Comput Med Commun. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00308.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pacherie E (2015) The sense of agency. Psyche. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190267278.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ray C, Mondada F, Siegwart R (2008) What do people expect from robots? 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, pp 3816–3821. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2008.4650714
- Riether N, Hegel F, Wrede B, Horstmann G (2012) Social facilitation with social robots? In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction—HRI’12, pp 41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157697
- Rugg MD (1985) The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 22(6):642–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01661.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sirkin D, Ju W (2012) Consistency in physical and on-screen action improves perceptions of telepresence robots. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction—HRI’12, pp 57. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157699
- Spatola N, Urbanska K (2018) Conscious machines: robots rights. Science 359(6374):400Google Scholar
- Sundar SS, Waddell TF, Jung EH (2016) The hollywood robot syndrome: media effects on older adults’ attitudes toward robots and adoption intentions. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2016–April, pp 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451771
- Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Koay K, Walters ML (2009) The negative attitudes towards robots scale and reactions to robot behaviour in a live human–robot interaction study. In: Proceedings of the AISB symposium on new frontiers in human–robot interaction. Edinburgh, UK, pp 109–115Google Scholar
- Wainer J, Feil-Seifer DJ, Shell DA, Matarić MJ (2006) The role of physical embodiment in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings—IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314404
- Walters ML, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Koay KL (2008) Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton Robots 24(2):159–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9058-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar