pp 1–14 | Cite as

Culture, the process of knowledge, perception of the world and emergence of AI

  • Badrudin AmershiEmail author
Open Forum


Considering the technological development today, we are facing an emerging crisis. We are in the midst of a scientific revolution, which promises to radically change not only the way we live and work—but beyond that challenge the stability of the very foundations of our civilization and the international political order. All our attention and effort is thus focused on cushioning its impacts on life and society. Looking back in history, it would be pertinent to ask whether this process is a “quasi” natural event destined to continue its path which forebodes severe ethical, social and political repercussions, or is it the outcome of a particular socio-cultural value system? What then are the different value systems and mind-sets? How do these impact on our perception of the world, our cognition systems and our self-perception? At the core of this revolution are the recent technological developments in information and data processing and the creation of AI and the role of algorithms. Are algorithms quasi “independent” artificial languages for assessing situations, solving problems and taking decisions on fundamental social issues? Or do they rest on the fundament of natural language? What ethical and moral code do they follow? What drivers underlie this technological process? Are these culture specific or universal? Could a change of “cultural perspective” provide us with new insights to steer the process and change its course?


Technology Industrial process Cultural values “Eastern” and “Western” cultures Perception Cognition and knowledge Language Algorithms AI “Self-reflection” Ethical decisions and judgements Nature and human nature 



  1. Adorno TW, Horkheimer M (2002) Dialectic of enlightenment. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird Callicott J, McRae J (eds) (2014) Environmental philosophy in Asian traditions of thought. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  3. Claxton M (1997) Culture and development, a study. UNESCO World Decade for Development Decade for Cultural Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Descartes R (1637) Discourse on the method. In: Cottingham J, Stoothoff R, Murdoch D (eds) The philosophical writings of Descartes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Transl).Google Scholar
  5. Garibaldo F (2017) Industry 4.0, Fondazione Claudio Sabattini and Associazione Punto RossoGoogle Scholar
  6. Gellner E (1992) Reason and culture. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Gill KS (2017) Uncommon voices of AI. AI Soc 32:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill KS (2018) Data to decision and judgement making—a question of wisdom. IFAC PapersOnLine. 51(30):733–738. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gödel K (1992) On formally undecidable propositions of principia mathematica and related systems. Dover, New York (Trl. B. Meltzer, Introduction by R. B. Braithwaite) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen C (1983) Language and logic in ancient China. J Philos 1987 84(1):37–42Google Scholar
  11. Hofstede G (1984) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  12. Ihde D (1993) Technology as a cultural instrument. In: Postphenomenology: essays in the postmodern context. Illinois, pp 32–42Google Scholar
  13. Kant I (1998) Critique of pure reason (Transl.). In: Guyer P, Wood AW (eds). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitayama S (2011) Asian psychology coming of age. American Association for Psychology, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Larson EJ (2015) Limits of modern AI. A story in The Best Schools magazine.
  16. Lauriston Sharp R (1939) Tribes and totemism in Northeast Australia. Oceania 8:254 (275, 439–461) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leibniz GW (1923) Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Herausgegeben von der Preußischen—Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1923Google Scholar
  18. Lewis R (2006) When cultures collide. Nicholas Brealey International, Boston (rev. ed) Google Scholar
  19. Marcuse H (1964) One dimensional man. Studies in the ideology of modern industrial society. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Mittelstrass J (1979) The Philosopher’s conception of Mathesis Universalis from Descartes to Leibniz. Ann Sci 36:6. (593–610) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore CA (ed) (1968) The Chinese mind: essentials of Chinese philosophy. University of Hawaii, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakamura H (1964) Ways of thinking of eastern peoples India, China Tibet, Japan. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  23. Nisbett RE (2003) The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A (2001) Culture and systems of thought: holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychol Rev 108:291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Penrose R (1989) The Emperor’s new mind concerning computers, minds and the laws of physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 395–439 (esp) Google Scholar
  26. Pettinger T (2009) Problems of Chinese economic growth—economics help.
  27. Sparkes M (2015) Top scientists call for caution over artificial intelligence. The Telegraph (UK), BBC News, Dec. 2014Google Scholar
  28. The Guardian, International Edition (2018) Cambridge Analytica: How did it turn clicks into votes?Google Scholar
  29. Thomä D (2003) Heidegger-Handbuch. J. B. Metzler, Stuttgart–WeimarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tripathi AK (2017) Hermeneutics of technological culture. AI Soc 32(2):137–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UNESCO (1997) Culture and technology. A study. Prof. Andrew O. Urvebu, Doc./DEC/PRO-1997Google Scholar
  32. Varnum ME, Grossmann I, Kitayama S, Nisbett RE (2010) The origin of cultural differences in cognition, the social orientation hypothesis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 19(1):9–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weber M (2002) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Penguin Books, London (Transl. Peter Baehr and Gordon C. Wells) Google Scholar
  34. Wittgenstein L (2003) Tractatus logico-philosophicus (Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung). Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am MainCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Wittgenstein L (2009) Philosophical investigations, 4th edn. In Hacker PMS, Schulte J (eds and trans). Oxford: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang C (2013) Sociology Mind 3(2):179–18.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cpo-ImOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations