Advertisement

The posthuman abstract: AI, DRONOLOGY & “BECOMING ALIEN”

  • Louis ArmandEmail author
Open Forum
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

This paper is addressed to recent theoretical discussions of the Anthropocene, in particular Bernard Stiegler’s Neganthropocene (Open Universities Press, 2018), which argues: “As we drift past tipping points that put future biota at risk, while a post-truth regime institutes the denial of ‘climate change’ (as fake news), and as Silicon Valley assistants snatch decision and memory, and as gene-editing and a financially-engineered bifurcation advances over the rising hum of extinction events and the innumerable toxins and conceptual opiates that Anthropocene Talk fascinated itself with—in short, as ‘the Anthropocene’ discloses itself as a dead-end trap…”. The objective of this paper is therefore twofold: (1) to discuss how the Anthropocene is appropriated to certain ideological discourses (paradoxically) to maintain the hegemony of precisely those systems of production that have most accelerated climate change etc.; (2) to consider how the factography of the Anthropocene is exploited in this process to mask the ideological character of industry-aligned “technocratic” environmental management. The paper is not concerned with specific case studies in terms of government and industry policy, or climate science, but rather with the ways in which the discourse of the Anthropocene has been inflected within the humanities and the broader cultural field—that is to say, ideologically, as a system or logic of meaning. How the Anthropocene “means” is, in this respect, a question of some importance. This paper does not attempt to address all the facets of this question, but focuses upon a central “apocalyptic” strain in the discourse of the Anthropocene drawn particularly from Francis Fukuyama’s millennial posthumanism and centred in the question of “sustainability” as catastrophe management—with the risk that real environmental degradation will become an alibi for a revived neoliberalism. In other words, that the critical Earth system transformations that characterise the Anthropocene are themselves commodities, and that the project of their amelioration is in process of defining a future (opportunistic) “crisis” rhetoric with a global political franchise. The ideological import of the Anthropocene stems precisely from the fact that it is planetary and, while catalysed by human agency, independent in its specific behaviour from it. The Anthropocene objectively presents as the contemporary counterpart of the Cold War doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction and the most compelling argument for a new kind of technological “arms race.” But it also presents as the condition of an emerging ideological discourse which will determine how this race is run. From the discourse on “energy security” to the widespread “security crackdown” on environmental activists across the so-called developed & developing world, the Anthropocene has come to represent the co-option of a scientific factography for the thinly disguised resurgence of “ideological science” of the Fukuyamaesque variety (post-history, post-human). For Fukuyama, the true meaning of “posthuman” is thus the accomplishment of humanity’s historical mission. As the “End of History” designates an end of ideological struggle, so too the dénouement of the Anthropocene and the “ends of man” represent the accomplished purpose of species warfare: dominion, not simply over the world, but over all possible worlds. According to this narrative, science—like technology—must be uniquely at the service of the maintenance of the global order, organised around a universal appeal to “crisis management.” It is precisely for this reason that what calls itself post-human masks the return of an ever-more-apocalyptic Humanism.

Keywords

Posthumanism Technological singularity Human extinction event Robotic Evolution Ideology Biotechnology Commodification Neganthropocene End of history 

Notes

References

  1. Bateson G (1973) Conscious purpose versus nature. In: Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Paladin, St AlbinsGoogle Scholar
  2. Baudrillard J (2006) Utopia Deferred, trans. Stuart Kendall. New York: Semiotext(e)Google Scholar
  3. Bentham J (1995) The Panopticon Writings [1791], ed. M Bozovic. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. De Landa M (1991) War in the age of intelligent machines. New York: ZoneGoogle Scholar
  5. Derrida J (1981) Dissemination, trans. B Johnson. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukuyama F (1992) The end of history and the last man. Hamish Hamilton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Fukuyama F (2002) Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnological revolution. Picador, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Joyce J (1967) The Sisters, Dubliners, ed. R Scholes with R Ellmann. Viking Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Lacan J (1977) The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis, ed. J-A Miller, trans. A Sheridan. The Hogarth Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Lacan J (1988) A materialist definition of the phenomenon of consciousness, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book II: the ego in Freud’s theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis 1954–1955, trans. S. Tomaselli. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Marx K (1973) Outlines of the critique of political economy, trans. M Nicolaus. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. McCoy A (2010) The decline and fall of the American Empire. The Nation. http://www.thenation.com/article/decline-and-fall-american-empire/. Accessed 6 Dec 2010
  13. Prokopenko M, Budden DM (2015) Is humanity just a phase in robotic evolution? World Economic Forum. http://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/09/is-humanity-just-a-phase-in-robotic-evolution/. Accessed Sep 2015
  14. Sierra G (2016) Deep Media Fiction, Numéro Cinq VII.1. humerocinqmagazinecom/2016/01/04/deep-media-fiction-essay-german-sierra/. Accessed Jan 2016Google Scholar
  15. Stiegler B (2018) The Neganthropocene, ed., trans., and intro. D Ross. Open Humanities Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Žižek S (2014) Absolute recoil: towards a new foundation of dialectical materialism. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Critical and Cultural Theory, Philosophy FacultyCharles UniversityPraha 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations