Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 889–898 | Cite as

The naturalness of artificial intelligence from the evolutionary perspective

  • Vladimír HavlíkEmail author
Open Forum

Abstract

Current discussions on artificial intelligence, in both the theoretical and practical realms, contain a fundamental lack of clarity regarding the nature of artificial intelligence, perhaps due to the fact that the distinction between natural and artificial appears, at first sight, both intuitive and evident. Is AI something unnatural, non-human and therefore dangerous to humanity, or is it only a continuation of man’s natural tendency towards creativity? It is not surprising that from the philosophical point of view, this distinction is the basic question that fundamentally affects all other considerations and conclusions pertaining to artificial intelligence. In this article, I would like to explain this difference and draw attention to some conclusions, which may result from a naturalistic perspective with regard to recent philosophical posthumanism. For this purpose, I present several examples of the natural–artificial distinction in the different fields of the philosophy of science and then discuss their implications for the problem of intelligence. Based on Dennett’s conception of intentionality and the naturalistic perspective, I demonstrate that besides the traditional conception, there is a non-anthropocentric evolutionary view in which the natural–artificial distinction disappears and it is possible to see a united process of intelligence creation.

Keywords

Artificial Natural Intelligence Artifact Evolution Intentionality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Czech Scientific Foundation (Grant no. 17-16370S).

References

  1. Aristotle (1930) Physics. Translated by Hardie RP, Gaye RK, RP, Physica in The Works of Aristotle v. 2, WD Ross (eds) Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker LR (2007) The metaphysics of everyday life: an essay in practical realism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad K (2003) Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: J Women Cult Soc 28(3):801–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bensaude-Vincent B, Newman WR (2007) The artificial and the natural. An evolving polarity, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Boden M (1977) Artificial intelligence and natural man. Harvester Press, Atlantic HeightsGoogle Scholar
  6. Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Braidotti R (2013) The Posthuman. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler S (1872) Erewhon: or, over the range, 1 edn. Trubner & Co, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler S (1926). Darwin among the Machines. In: The Notebooks of Samuel Butler. Vol. 20 of The Shrewsbury Edition of the Works of Samuel Butler, Jonathon Cape, London, 35–40Google Scholar
  10. Chrisley R (2000) The concept of artificial intelligence, general introduction. In: Chrisley R, Sander B (eds) Artificial intelligence: critical concepts, vol I. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Chrisley R (2008) Philosophical foundations of artificial consciousness. Artif Intell Med 44(2):119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Churchland P (2007) Neurophilosophy at work. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darwin Ch (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennett DC (1996a) Kinds of minds: towards an understanding of consciousness. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennett DC (1996b) Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennett DC (2017) From bacteria to bach and back: the evolution of minds. W.W. Norton & Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Dumit J (2014) Writing the Implosion: Teaching the World One. Cult Anthropol 29(2):344–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekbia HR (2008) Artificial Dreams: the quest for non-biological intelligence. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrando F (2013) Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism and new materialisms. Diff Relat Exist 8(2):26–32MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Hacking I (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haraway DJ (1985) Manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980’s. Soc Rev 80:65–108Google Scholar
  22. Haraway DJ (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Haraway DJ (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Haraway DJ (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Haugeland J (1997) Mind design II: philosophy, psychology, and artificial intelligence. Bradford Book. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Kroes P (1994). Science, technology and experiments; the natural versus the artificial. In: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1994, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers, pp. 431–440Google Scholar
  27. Morton T (2012) The ecological thought. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morton T (2013) Hyperobjects: philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  29. Müller VC (2012) Introduction: philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence. Minds Mach 22:67–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Negrotti M (1991) Conclusions: the dissymmetry of mind and the role of the artificial. In: Negrotti M (ed) Understanding the artificial: on the future shape of artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nilsson NJ (1998) Artificial intelligence: a new synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann Pub, San FranciscozbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Poole DL, Mackworth AK (2010) Artificial intelligence. Foundations of computational agents. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Romportl J (2015) Naturalness of Artificial Intelligence. In: Romportl J, Zackova E, Kelemen J (eds) Beyond artificial intelligence, topics in intelligent engineering and informatics, vol 9. Springer, Cham, pp 211–216Google Scholar
  34. Ruse M (1975) Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution: an analysis. J Hist Biol 8(2):219–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Russell JS, Norvig P (2010) Artificial intelligence. A modern approach, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall series in artificial intelligence. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  36. Sargent R-M (1995) The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Searle J (1983) Intentionality: an essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shapiro SC (ed) (1992) Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence, Second edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Sokolowski R (1988) Natural and artificial intelligence. Daedalus 117(1):45–64MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. Welsch W (2012) Mensch und Welt: Eine evolutionäre Perspektive der Philosophie. Beck, MunichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Welsch W (2017) Postmodernism—posthumanism—evolutionary anthropology. J Posthuman Studies 1(1):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Czech Academy of SciencesInstitute of PhilosophyPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations