Two-dimensional opinion dynamics in social networks with conflicting beliefs
- 281 Downloads
Two models are developed for updating opinions in social networks under situations where certain beliefs might be considered to be competing. These two models represent different attitudes of people towards the perceived conflict between beliefs. In both models agents have a degree of tolerance, which represents the extent to which the agent takes into account the differing beliefs of other agents, and a degree of conflict, which represents the extent to which two beliefs are considered to be competing. Computer simulations are used to determine how the opinion dynamics are affected by the inclusion of conflict. Results show that conflict can enhance the formation of consensus within the network in certain circumstances according to one of the models.
KeywordsOpinion dynamics Bounded confidence model Social network Conflicting opinions
This publication was made possible by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation (Grant No. 40676). The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. The first author has been partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61175055, 61305074 and 61673320).
- Chen S, Glass DH, McCartney M (2015) Dynamics of conflicting beliefs in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th workshop on complex networks (CompleNet 2015), Studies in computational intelligence, vol. 597, Springer, New York, 25–27 March 27, 2015, pp. 171–178Google Scholar
- Harary F (1959) A criterion for unanimity in French’s theory of social power. In: Cartwright D (ed) Studies in social power. Oxford, England, pp 168–182Google Scholar
- Hegselmann R, Krause U (2002) Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis, and simulations. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 5(3):1–33Google Scholar
- Lorenz J (2008) Fostering consensus in multidimensional continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence. In: Helbing D (ed) Managing complexity. Springer, Berlin, pp 321–334Google Scholar