Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 921–929 | Cite as

Evil and roboethics in management studies

  • Enrico BeltraminiEmail author
Open Forum
  • 132 Downloads

Abstract

In this article, I address the issue of evil and roboethics in the context of management studies and suggest that management scholars should locate evil in the realm of the human rather than of the artificial. After discussing the possibility of addressing the reality of evil machines in ontological terms, I explore users’ reaction to robots in a social context. I conclude that the issue of evil machines in management is more precisely a case of technology anthropomorphization.

Keywords

Roboethics Evil Management Anthropomorphism 

References

  1. Adams G, Balfour DL (2009) Unmasking administrative evil. M.E. Sharpe, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen RE (2006) Plato: the republic. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkin R (2009) Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. Hall/CRC, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asimov I (1942) Runaround. Astounding Sci Fiction 29(2):94–103Google Scholar
  5. Bataille G (2001) Literature and evil. Marion Boyars Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein RJ (2002) Radical evil: a philosophical investigation. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Bostrom N (2002) Existential risks: analyzing human extinction scenarios. J Evol Technol 9:1–30Google Scholar
  8. Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Bostrom N, Yudkowsky E (2011) The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: Ramsey William, Frankish Keith (eds) Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 316–334Google Scholar
  10. Calder T (2002) Towards a theory of evil: a critique of Laurence Thomas’s theory of evil acts. In: Haybron DM (ed) Earth’s abominations: philosophical studies of evil. Rodopi, New York, pp 51–61Google Scholar
  11. Coeckelbergh M (2009) Personal robots, appearance, and human good: a methodological reflection on roboethics. Int J Soc Robot 1(3):217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coeckelbergh M (2010) You, Robot: on the linguistic construction of artificial others. AI & Soc 26(1):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coeckelbergh M (2012) Can we trust robots? Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croogan MD et al (2010) The New Oxford annotated Bible with Apocrypha: new revised standard version. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Darley JM (1992) Social organization for the production of evil. Psychol Inq 3:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darley JM (1996) How organizations socialize individuals into evildoing. In: Messick David M, Tenbrunsel Ann E (eds) Codes of conduct: behavioral research into business ethics. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 179–204Google Scholar
  17. Dennett DC (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Dennett Daniel (1998) When HAL kills, who’s to blame? Computer ethics. In: Stork D (ed) HAL’s legacy: 2001’s computer as dream and reality. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114:864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Floridi L, Sanders J (2004) On the morality of artificial agents. Mind Mach 14(3):349–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garrard E (1998) The nature of evil. Philos Explor Int J Philos Mind Action 1(1):43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garrard E (2002) Evil as an explanatory concept. The Monist 85(2):320–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geddes JL (2003) Banal evil and useless knowledge: Hannah Arendt and Charlotte Delbo on evil after the holocaust. Hypatia 18:104–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Irrgang B (2006) Ethical acts in robotics. Ubiquity 7(34). http://www.acm.org/ubiquity. Accessed 12 Oct 2017
  26. Johnson V, Brennan LL, Johnson VE (2004) Social, ethical and policy implications of information technology. Information Science Publishing, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamm F (2007) Intricate ethics: rights, responsibilities, and permissible harm. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kroll JA, Huey J, Barocas S, Felten EW, Reindenberg JR, Robinson DG, Yu H (eds) (2016). Accountable algorithms. Univ PA Law Rev 165: 633Google Scholar
  29. Lee S, Kiesler S, Lau IY, Chiu C-Y (2005) Human mental models of humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA’05). Barcelona, April 18–22, pp 2767–2772Google Scholar
  30. Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (2014) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. The MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  31. Loughnan S, Haslan N (2007) Animals and androids: implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans. Psychol Sci 18:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mittelstadt B, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L (2016) The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc 3(2):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nadeau JE (2006) Only androids can be ethical. In: Ford K, Glymour C (eds) Thinking about android epistemology. MIT Press, Boston, pp 241–248Google Scholar
  34. Neiman S (2002) Evil in modern thought. an alternative history of philosophy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  35. Pasquale F (2015) The black box society: the secret algorithm behind money and information. Harvard University Press, MassachusettsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powers TM (2009) Machines and moral reasoning. Philos Now 72:15–16Google Scholar
  37. Powers TM (2016) Prospects for a Kantian machine. In: Wallach W, Asaro P (eds) Machine ethics and robot ethics. Ashgate Publishing, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  38. Powers A, Kiesler S, Fussell S, Torrey C (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of HRI07, pp 145–152Google Scholar
  39. Schnall S, Cannon PR (2012) The clean conscience at work: emotions, intuitions and morality. J Manag Spiritual Relig 9(4):295–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sofge E (2014) Robots are evil: the sci-fi myth of killer machines. Pop Sci. http://www.popsci.com/blog-network/zero-moment/robots-are-evil-sci-fi-myth-killer-machines. Accessed 13 June 2017
  41. Staub E (1989 reprinted in 1992) The roots of evil: the origins of genocide and other group violence. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Steiner H (2002) Calibrating evil. The Monist 85(2):183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Styhre A, Sundgren M (2003) Management is evil: management control, technoscience and saudade in pharmaceutical research. Leadersh Organ Dev J 24(8):436–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sullins JP (2005) Ethics and artificial life: from modeling to moral agents. Ethics Inf Technol 7:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sullins JP (2006) When is a robot a Moral Agent? Int Rev Inf Ethics 6(12):24–30Google Scholar
  46. Taddeo M (2010) Trust in technology: a distinctive and a problematic relation. Know Technol Policy 23(3–4):283–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tang TL-P (2010) Money, the meaning of money, management, spirituality, and religion. J Manag Spiritual Relig 7(2):173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59:433–460MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wallach W, Allen C (2008) Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Waytz A, Cacioppo J, Epley N (2010) ‘Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect Psychol Sci 5:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zimbardo P (2007) The Lucifer effect: understanding how good people turn evil. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Notre Dame de Namur UniversityBelmontUSA

Personalised recommendations