A glance of cultural differences in the case of interactive device art installation idMirror

AI & SOCIETY volume 33, pages573–582(2018)Cite this article

Abstract

The idMirror project consists of a tablet computer, specially equipped with a small mirror and a newly developed android app. The Android application uses face recognition to detect the location of the user’s face in relation to the device and based on this renders a computer graphic at the location of his or her reflection. The goal of the idMirror project setting as a research tool was to make an exploratory study on cultural differences at exhibition venues. For this study, we have analyzed 150 participants’ face images aged between 18 and 75; among them, 50 (25 females and 25 males) participants’ face images collected in Europe, 50 (25 females and 25 males) participants’ face images collected in the USA, and 50 (25 females and 25 males) participants’ face images collected in Japan. We found global exhibitions a good research platform for random sampling of the subjects. For the study, we examined the first 50 (25 female and 25 male) participants at each exhibition and we found some significant differences. Through the explanatory study in the form of an art installation, we wanted to learn if the facial expression upon one’s own self-observation is a function of gender and place of exhibition setting origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Babbie RE (2013) The practice of social research, 13th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  2. Botler JD, Gromala D (2005) Windows and mirrors. The MIT Press, Cambridge, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deleuze G (1989) Cinema II. Chapter The actual and the virtual, The Athlone Press Published by the University of Minnesota Press, pp 150–151, ISBN 0-8166-1676-0 (v.2)

  4. Elfenbein H, Ambady N (2003) Universals and cultural differences in recognizing emotions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 12(5):159–164. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.mit.edu/stable/20182868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Emotions recognition in images, The emotion API by Microsoft. https://www.microsoft.com/cognitive-services/en-us/emotion-api. Accessed 19 Oct 2016

  6. Ginsburg D, Purnomo B (2009) OpenGL ES 3.0 programming guide, vol 2. Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. GitHub. idMirror. Available at: https://github.com/FlorisE/idMirror

  8. Hofstede G (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Read Psychol Cult 2(1):8. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jazbec M, Erich F (2016) Investigating human identity using the idMirror interactive installation. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM conference on human factors in computer systems, pp 3851–3854. doi:10.1145/2851581.2891091

  10. Kusahara M (2010) Device art: a new approach in understanding Japanese contemporary media art. In: Grau O (ed) Media art histories. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 277–307, ISBN:9780262514989

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto D (1991) Cultural influences on facial expression of emotion. South Commun  J 56:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsumoto D, Ekman P (1989)  American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion. Motiv Emot J 13:143. doi:10.1007/BF00992959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikami S. Desire of codes http://special.ycam.jp/doc/work/index_en.html

  14. Tifentale A, Manovich L (2015) Selfiecity: exploring photography and self-fashioning in social media. In: Berry D, Dieter M (eds) Postdigital aesthetics: art, computation and design. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 109–122

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turkle S (2005) Second self: computers and the human spirit. The MIT Press, Cambridge, p 279

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rozin D. Wooden mirror. http://www.smoothware.com/danny/woodenmirror.html

  17. Zhu Z, Ho S, Bonanno G (2013) Cultural similarities and differences in the perception of emotional valence and intensity: a comparison of Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Am J Psychol 126(3):261–273. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.3.0261

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was developed at the University of Tsukuba at the Empowerment Informatics Department with the collaboration of the Ars Electronica Future Lab.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Program in Empowerment Informatics, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba, 305-8573, Japan

    Maša Jazbec & Floris Erich Arden

  2. Faculty of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba, 305-8573, Japan

    Hiroo Iwata

Authors
  1. Maša Jazbec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Floris Erich Arden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hiroo Iwata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maša Jazbec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jazbec, M., Arden, F.E. & Iwata, H. A glance of cultural differences in the case of interactive device art installation idMirror. AI & Soc 33, 573–582 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0737-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cultural differences
  • Facial expression
  • Interactivity
  • Physical reality
  • Mobile technologies
  • Device art