Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 323–333 | Cite as

Economic language and economy change: with implications for cyber-physical systems

  • Alan CotteyEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The implementation of cyber-physical and similar systems depends on prevailing social and economic conditions. It is here argued that, if the effect of these technologies is to be benign, the current neo-liberal economy must change to a radically more cooperative model. In this paper, economy change means a thorough change to a qualitatively different kind of economy. It is contrasted with economic change, which is the kind of minor change usually considered in mainstream discourse. The importance of language is emphasised, including that of techno-optimism and that of economic conservatism. Problems of injustice, strife, and ecological overload cannot be solved by conventional growth together with technical efficiency gains. Rather, a change is advocated from economics-as-usual to a broader concept, oikonomia (root-household management), which takes into account all that contributes to a good life, including what cannot be represented quantitatively. Some elements of such a broader economy (work; basic income; asset and income limits) are discussed. It is argued that the benefits of technology can be enhanced and the ills reduced in such an economy. This is discussed in the case of cyber-physical systems under the headings employment, security, standards and oligopoly, and energy efficiency. The paper concludes that such systems, and similar technological developments, cannot resolve the problems of sustainability within an economy-as-usual model. If, however, there is the will to create a cooperative and sustainable economy, technology can contribute significantly to the resolution of present problems.

Keywords

Economic language Economy change Cyber-physical systems Industry 4.0 Industrie 4.0 Fourth industrial revolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges with thanks comments by P. Pickbourne and an anonymous referee.

References

  1. Ackerman F, Stanton EA (2013) Climate economics: the state of the art. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman B, Alstott A, van Parijs P (2006) Redesigning distribution: basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Akst D (2013) Automation anxiety. Wilson Quarterly 37(3):66-78. Also at http://wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/summer-2014-where-have-all-the-jobs-gone/theres-much-learn-from-past-anxiety-over-automation/. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  4. Athanasiou T (1997) Slow reckoning: the ecology of a divided planet. Secker and Warburg, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson AB (1995) Public economics in action: the basic income/flat tax proposal. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. AtKisson A (2011) Believing Cassandra: how to be an optimist in a pessimist’s world (2e). Earthscan, London. The first chapter of this book is also available at https://web.archive.org/web/20120123173440, http://www.earthscan.co.uk/Portals/0/pdfs/Believing_Cassandra_Ch1.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  7. Autor DH (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J Econ Perspectives 29(3):3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avery JS (2016) Science and society. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barber BR (2008) Con$Umed: how markets corrupt children, infantilize adults, and swallow citizens whole. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Barder AD (2016) Neo-materialist ecologies and global systemic crises. Globalizations 13(4):396–408. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2015.1111655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Battersby S, Else L, George A, Norton MI, Pearce F, Rogers D (2012) The age of inequality. New Sci 215(2875):37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beckerman W (1972) Economists, scientists, and environmental catastrophe. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 24(3):327–344. Oxford University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2662142. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  13. Beddington J (2009) The perfect storm. Government Office for Science. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/go-science/news/speeches/the-perfect-storm. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  14. Belton T (2014) Happier people healthier planet. Silverwood, BristolGoogle Scholar
  15. Black B (1992) The abolition of work, and other essays. Loompanics Unlimited, Port Townsend, WAGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown D (2002) Insatiable is not sustainable. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  17. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The second machine age. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Burkeman O (2016) A brief history of time management. The Guardian 22 December pp 31–33. Also, with the title ‘Why time management is ruining our lives’, at https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/22/why-time-management-is-ruining-our-lives. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  19. Carson R (1963) Silent spring. Hamish Hamilton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Citizen’s Income Trust (2016). http://citizensincome.org. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  21. Collins C (2012) 99 to 1: how wealth inequality is wrecking the world and what we can do about it. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  22. Collins C (2016) Born on third base: a one percenter makes the case for tackling inequality, bringing wealth home, and committing to the common good. Chelsea Green, White River JunctionGoogle Scholar
  23. Costanza R, Cumberland JH, Daly H, Goodland R, Norgaard RB, Kubiszewski I, Franco C (2015) An introduction to ecological economics (2e). CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  24. Cottey A (2000) Asset and income limits. https://archive.uea.ac.uk/~c013/v2/ail/ail.xhtml. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  25. Cottey A (2013) Technologies, culture, work, basic income and maximum income. AI & Society. doi: 10.1007/s00146-013-0480-0. Print version in AI and Society (2014), 29(2):249-257. Author’s accepted manuscript available at http://uea.ac.uk/~c013/v2/tcwbimi-final.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  26. Danesi M (2016) Language, society and new media: sociolinguistics today. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. de Angelis M (2007) The beginning of history: value struggles and global capital. Pluto, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Dorling D (2014) Inequality and the 1%. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Fielden J (1969) The curse of the factory system. Frank Cass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Fukuyama F (1992) The end of history and the last man. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  31. Gabriel M, Pessl E (2016) Industry 4.0 and sustainability impacts: critical discussion of sustainability aspects with a special focus on future of work and ecological consequences. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara Int J Eng 14(2):131–136Google Scholar
  32. Garnsey P (2007) Thinking about property: from antiquity to the age of revolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gaskell P (1968) Artisans and machinery. Frank Cass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Gingell J (2015) Economics jargon promotes a deficit in understanding. The Guardian, 14 August. https://www.theguardian.com/media/mind-your-language/2015/aug/14/economics-jargon-promotes-a-deficit-in-understanding. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  35. Giroux H (2016) Thinking dangerously in the age of normalized ignorance. Counterpunch 30 September. http://counterpunch.org/2016/09/30/thinking-dangerously-in-the-age-of-normalized-ignorance. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  36. Graeber D (2012) Debt: the first 5000 years. Melville House, BrooklynzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamilton C (2004) Growth fetish. Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Harrison Dinniss H (2012) Cyber warfare and the laws of war. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henley J (2017) Finland blazes trail with basic income for the jobless. The Guardian 4 January 2017, p 15. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/03/finland-trials-basic-income-for-unemployed. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  40. Howell L (2016) Talking ‘bout a revolution: science will be in the vanguard of a new economic era. New Sci 229(3057):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hyde WL (1979) The gift: imagination and the erotic life of property. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2017) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  43. Jiang J, Roy S, Liu J, Donde V (2015) Decision-support tools for renewables-rich power systems: a stochastic futures approach. In: Khaitan SK, McCalley JD, Liu CC (eds) Cyber physical systems approach to smart electric power grid. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 133–168Google Scholar
  44. Jones R (2012) The Luddites: at war with the future. History Today 62(5):47–52. http://www.historytoday.com/richard-jones/luddites-war-future Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  45. Khaitan SK, McCalley JD, Liu CC (eds) (2015) Cyber physical systems approach to smart electric power grid. Springer, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45928-7 Google Scholar
  46. Kothari A, Pathak N, Vania F (2000) Where communities care: community-based wildlife and ecosystem management in South Asia. Kalpavriksh, PuneGoogle Scholar
  47. Kothari A, Demaria F, Acosta A (2014) Buen Vivir, Degrowth and Ecological Swaraj: alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy. Development 57(3–4):362–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kroll L, Dolan K (2016) The world’s billionaires. Forbes magazine, 3 January. http://www.forbes.com/billionaires. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  49. Laverty P, Loach K (2016) I, Daniel Blake. http://www.metacritic.com/movie/i-daniel-blake. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  50. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2014) Recent advances and trends of cyber-physical systems and big data analytics in industrial informatics. Proc Int Conf Ind Inf. doi: 10.13140/2.1.1464.1920 Google Scholar
  51. Majhi SK, Patra G, Dhal SK (2015) Cyber physical systems and public utility in India: state of art. Proced Comput Sci 78:777–781. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.02.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Matthews L, Matthews A (2014) Framespotting: changing how you look at things changes how you see them. Iff Books, WinchesterGoogle Scholar
  53. Maxmen A (2016) The myth buster. Nature 540(7633):330–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Metz B et al (eds) (2005) Safeguarding the ozone layer and the global climate system: issues related to hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Mies M, Bennholdt-Thomsen V (1999) The subsistence perspective: beyond the globalised economy. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. BBC News (2016) Irish lottery site and ticket machines hit by DDoS attack. http://bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35373890. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  58. O’Riordan T (1976) Environmentalism. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Oxfam (2016) An economy for the 1%: how privilege and power in the economy drive extreme inequality and how this can be stopped. http://oxfamamerica.org/static/media/files/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  60. Peterson del Mar D (2012) Environmentalism. Pearson, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  61. Pinker S (2011) The better angels of our nature: the decline of violence in history and its causes. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Pizzigati S (2004) Greed and good: understanding and overcoming the inequality that limits our lives. Apex, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Raventós D (2007) Basic income: the material conditions of freedom. Pluto, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Roberts K (1982) Automation, unemployment and the distribution of income. European Centre for Work and Society, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  65. Schwab K (2016) The fourth industrial revolution: what it means, how to respond. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  66. Skidelsky R (2016) A basic income could be the best way to tackle inequality. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/23/universal-basic-income-could-be-the-best-way-to-tackle-inequality. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  67. SMBWorld Asia Editors (2014) Internet-enabled devices fuel rising number of DDoS attacks. SMB World Asia 30 October 2014. http://www.enterpriseinnovation.net/article/internet-enabled-devices-fuel-rising-number-ddos-attacks-989954078. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  68. Stern NH (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change. The Stationery Office, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  69. Stern NH (2009) A blueprint for a safer planet: how to manage climate change and create a new era of progress and prosperity. Bodley Head, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. The Guardian (2016) Guardian Brexit watch: a better than expected year -but is this as good as it gets? The Guardian 22 December, pp 14–15Google Scholar
  71. Trainer FE (2007) Renewable energy cannot sustain a consumer society. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  72. Tsai PL, Hatfield TH (2011) Global benefits from the phaseout of leaded fuel. J Environ Health 74(5):8–14Google Scholar
  73. United Nations Environment Programme (2017) Disasters and conflicts. http://unep.org/disastersandconflicts. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  74. United Nations Population Fund (2016) State of world population 2016. http://www.unfpa.org/swop. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  75. Uslar M, Rohjans S, Trefke J (2012) Standardization in smart grids: introduction to IT-related methodologies, architectures and standards. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. von Weizsäcker EU, Lovins AB, Lovins LH (1997) Factor four: doubling wealth, halving resource use. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Wall D (2014) The sustainable economics of Elinor Ostrom: commons, contestation and craft. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  78. Walter T (1989) Basic income: freedom from poverty, freedom to work. Marion Boyars, LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilmer C (ed) (1998) News from nowhere: and other writings (by William Morris). Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. Worldwatch Institute (2017) Vital signs online. http://vitalsigns.worldwatch.org. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  81. Yang M, Yu X (2015) Energy efficiency: green energy and technology. Springer, London. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6666-5_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ChemistryUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations