Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 3–8 | Cite as

Primacy of I–you connectedness revisited: some implications for AI and robotics

  • Beata StawarskaEmail author
Original Article
  • 188 Downloads

Abstract

In this essay, I challenge the egocentric tradition which privileges the standpoint of an isolated individual, and propose a speech-based dialogical approach as an alternative. Considering that the egocentric tradition can be deciphered in part by analyzing the distortions undergone by pronominal discourse in the language of classical philosophy, I reexamine the pragmatics of ordinary language featuring the pronoun I in an effort to recover a more relational understanding of persons. I develop such an analysis of the deep grammar of pronominal discourse under the heading of ‘I–you connectedness’. I–you connectedness emphasizes the communicative structure of experience, in particular the phenomenological importance of the addressee, the inseparability of ‘I’ and ‘You’, and the nature of the alternation between them. I–you connectedness is the best thematized within living speech, which is invariably oriented towards an interlocutor, and animated by mutual address. Yet, I–you connectedness extends beyond living speech to other modalities of meaning, notably thinking and writing, where one notes a similar orientation to a living, imagined, or virtual addressee. I–you connectedness extends, therefore, beyond discursive experience, and captures the deep dialogic dimension of meaning in pre-linguistic and extra-linguistic life. I briefly consider its implications for theoretical and practical issues within robotics and AI.

Keywords

Dialogical philosophy I–you connectedness Pronoun I Buber Benveniste 

References

  1. Benveniste E (1971) Problems in general linguistics. University of Miami Press, Coral GablesGoogle Scholar
  2. Buber M (1970) I and Thou. Scribner and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Buber M (2005) Ich und Du. Gütersloher Verlagshaus, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. Humboldt von W (1907) Über den Dualis. Gesammelte Schriften, Band 6. Berlin: Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 4–30Google Scholar
  5. Humboldt von W (1999 [1836]) On language. On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species. Losonsky M, (Trans. Heath P) (eds.) Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Jopling D (1993) The philosophy of dialogue. In: Neisser U (ed) The perceived self. Ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Levinas E (1993) Outside the Subject. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Merleau-Ponty M (2000) The child’s relations with others. The Primacy of Perception. W. Cobb (trans.). Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosenzweig F (2000 [1925]) The new thinking. Philosophical and theological writings. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
  10. Stawarska B (2009) Between you and I: dialogical phenomenology. Ohio University Press, AthensGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of OreganEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations