Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 321–338 | Cite as

From Alan Turing to modern AI: practical solutions and an implicit epistemic stance

  • George F. LugerEmail author
  • Chayan Chakrabarti
Original Article

Abstract

It has been just over 100 years since the birth of Alan Turing and more than 65 years since he published in Mind his seminal paper, Computing Machinery and Intelligence (Turing in Computing machinery and intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1950). In the Mind paper, Turing asked a number of questions, including whether computers could ever be said to have the power of “thinking” (“I propose to consider the question, Can computers think?” ...Alan Turing, Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind, 1950). Turing also set up a number of criteria—including his imitation game—under which a human could judge whether a computer could be said to be “intelligent”. Turing’s paper, as well as his important mathematical and computational insights of the 1930s and 1940s led to his popular acclaim as the “Father of Artificial Intelligence”. In the years since his paper was published, however, no computational system has fully satisfied Turing’s challenge. In this paper we focus on a different question, ignored in, but inspired by Turing’s work: How might the Artificial Intelligence practitioner implement “intelligence” on a computational device? Over the past 60 years, although the AI community has not produced a general-purpose computational intelligence, it has constructed a large number of important artifacts, as well as taken several philosophical stances able to shed light on the nature and implementation of intelligence. This paper contends that the construction of any human artifact includes an implicit epistemic stance. In AI this stance is found in commitments to particular knowledge representations and search strategies that lead to a product’s successes as well as its limitations. Finally, we suggest that computational and human intelligence are two different natural kinds, in the philosophical sense, and elaborate on this point in the conclusion.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence Computational intelligence Epistemic stance 

References

  1. Bartlett F (1932) Remembering. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayes T (1763) Essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 370–418Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn S (2008) The Oxford dictionary of philosophy, 15th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks RA (1989) A robot that walks: emergent behaviors from a carefully evolved network. Neural Comput 1(2):253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks RA (1991) Intelligence without representation. In: Kaufmann M (ed) International joint conference on artificial intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 596–575Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (eds) (1984) Rule-based expert systems: the MYCIN experiments of the stanford heuristic programming project. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakrabarti C (2014) Artificial conversations for chatter bots using knowledge representation, learning, and pragmatics. Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakrabarti C, Luger G (2014) An anatomy for artificial conversation generation in the customer service domain. In: 25th modern artificial intelligence and cognitive science conference, pp 80–85Google Scholar
  9. Chakrabarti C, Luger GF (2015) Artificial conversations for customer service chatter bots: architecture, algorithms, and evaluation metrics. Expert Syst Appl 42(20):6878–6897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakrabarti C, Pless DJ, Rammohan RR, Luger GF (2007) Diagnosis using a first-order stochastic language that learns. Expert Syst Appl 32(3):832–840Google Scholar
  11. Chakrabarti C, Rammohan RR, Luger GF (2005) A first-order stochastic modeling language for diagnosis. In: Press A (ed) Proceedings of the 18th international Florida artificial intelligence research society conference, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakrabarti C, Rammohan RR, Luger GF (2005) A first-order stochastic prognostic system for the diagnosis of helicopter rotor systems for the US navy. In: Press E (ed) Second Indian international conference on artificial intelligence, Pune, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Chomsky N (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton, The HaguezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Church A (1936) An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory. Am J Math 58(2):345–363MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark A (2008) Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins A, Quillian MR (1969) Retreival time from semantic memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 8:240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Copeland BJ (2015) The Church-Turing. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  18. Demptster AP (1968) A generalization of bayesian inference. J Roy Stat Soc 30(Series B):1–38MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Descartes R (1996/1680) Meditations on First Philosophy (trans: Cottingham J). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewey J (1916) Democracy and education. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Dreyfus H (1979) What computers still can’t do. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Dreyfus H (2002) Intelligence without representation—Merleau–Ponty’s critique of mental representation the relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 1:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein R, Roberts G, Poland G (eds) (2008) Parsing the turing test: philosophical and methodological issues in the quest for the thinking computer. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferrucci D (2012) Introduction to “this is watson”. IBM J Res Dev 56(3–4):1–15Google Scholar
  25. Fikes RE, Nilsson NJ (1971) Strips: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to artificial intelligence. Artif Intell 1(2):227–232zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Glymour C (2001) The mind’s arrows: bayes nets and graphical causal models in psychology. MIT Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Gopnik A (2011) Probabilistic models as theories of children’s minds. Behav Brain Sci 34(4):200–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gopnik A (2011) A unified account of abstract structure and conceptual change. Probabilistic models and early learning mechanisms. Commentary on Susan Carey, “the origin of concepts”. Behav Brain Sci 34(3):126–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gopnik A, Glymour C, Sobel DM, Schulz LE, Kushnir T, Danks D (2004) A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and bayes nets. Psychol Rev 111(1):3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grice P (1975) Logic and conversation. Syntax Semant 3:41–58Google Scholar
  31. Harmon P, King D (1985) Expert systems: artificial intelligence in business. Wiley, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobbes T (2010/1651) Leviathan. Revised Edition. In: Martinich AP, Battiste B (eds) Broadview Press, Peterborough, ONGoogle Scholar
  34. Hopfield JJ (1984) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79:2554–2558MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. James W (1981) Pragmatism. Hackett, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. James W (2002) The varieties of religious experience. Longmans, Green, and Co, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Jurafsky D, Martin JH (2008) Speech and language processing, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  38. Kant I (1781) Immanuel Kant’s critique of pure reason. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Klein WB, Westervelt RT, Luger GF (1999) A general purpose intelligent control system for particle accelerators. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 7(1):1–12Google Scholar
  40. Kolodner JL (1993) Case-based reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, Los AltosCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Kowalski R (1979) Logic for problem solving. North-Holland, AmsterdamzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Kushnir T, Gopnik A, Lucas C, Schulz L (2010) Inferring hidden causal structure. Cogn Sci 34:148–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luger GF (2009) Artificial intelligence: structures and strategies for complex problem solving, 6th edn. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  44. Masterman M (1961) Semantic message detection for machine translation, using interlingua. In: Proceedings of the 1961 international conference on machine translationGoogle Scholar
  45. McCarthy J (1968) Programs with common sense. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. McCarthy J (1980) Circumscription, a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artif Intell 12:27–39CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. McCarthy J (1986) Applications of circumscription to formalizing common-sense knowledge. Artif Intell 28:89–116MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCarthy J, Hayes P (1969) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. The University Press, UKzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller G (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63(2):81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller GA (2003) The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 7:141–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Minsky M (1986) The society of mind. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Newell A, Simon H (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice Hall, PrenticeGoogle Scholar
  55. Newell A, Simon H (1976) Computer science as empirical enquiry: symbols and search. Commun ACM 19(3):113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, Los AltoszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. Pearl J (2000) Causality. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. Peirce CS (1958) Collected papers 1931–1958. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Piaget J (1954) The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Piaget J (1970) Structuralism. Basic Books, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. Pinker S, Bloom P (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behav Brain Sci 13:707–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Post E (1943) Formal reductions of the general combinatorial problem. Am J Math 65:197–268MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. Quillian MR (1967) Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Morgan Kaufmann, Los AltosGoogle Scholar
  64. Rammohan RR (2010) Three algorithms for causal learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  65. Rosenbloom PS, Lehman JF, Laird JE (1993) Overview of soar as a unified theory of cognition. In: Erlbaum (ed) Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the cognitive science societyGoogle Scholar
  66. Ryle G (2002) The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  67. Sakhanenko NA, Luger GF, Stern CR (2006) Managing dynamic contexts using failure-driven stochastic models. In: Press A (ed) Proceedings of the FLAIRS conferenceGoogle Scholar
  68. Sakhanenko NA, Rammohan RR, Luger GF, Stern CR (2008) A new approach to model-based diagnosis using probabilistic logic. In: Press A (ed) Proceedings of the 21st FLAIRS conferenceGoogle Scholar
  69. Schank RC, Colby KM (1975) Computer models of thought and language. Freeman, San FranciscozbMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. Searle J (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Searle J (1975) Indirect speech acts, chap. 3. Speech acts. Academic Press, New York, pp 59–82Google Scholar
  72. Simon H (1981) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  73. Sowa JF (1984) Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Addison-Wesley, ReadingzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. Sun R (ed) (2008) The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  75. Turing A (1936) On computable numbers with an application to the entscheidungsproblem. Lond Math Soci 2(42):230–265MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  76. Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  77. VandenBos GR (ed) (2007) APA dictionary of psychology, 1st edn. American Psychological Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  78. von Glaserfeld E (1978) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P (ed) The Invented Reality, pp 17–40. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilks Y (1972) Grammar, meaning, and the machine analysis of language. Routledge and Kagen Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams BC, Nayak PP (1996) A model-based approach to reactive self-reconfiguring systems. In: Press M (ed) Proceedings of the AAAI-96, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 971–978Google Scholar
  81. Williams BC, Nayak, PP (1997) A reactive planner for a model-based executive. In: Press M (ed) Proceedings of IJCAI-97Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations