AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 507–519 | Cite as

Social Presence and the void in distant relationships: How do people use communication technologies to turn absence into fondness of the heart, rather than drifting out of mind?

Original Article

Abstract

In general terms, Social Presence is a feeling of togetherness regardless of spatial or temporal separation. It is a socioemotional attitude that reflexively centres on other people, via perceptions of their affective attitudes towards oneself. Communication technologies contribute to the maintenance of close personal relationships by facilitating welcome and timely socioemotional presence in the mind of an absent other. Presence of this kind may be ‘in the moment’ of communication and also persist over time, as it is ‘topped up’ through repeated interactions. In this paper, we consider how type of personal relationship and degree of physical separation might condition the Social Presence value of a range of media. We report ratings of Closeness and Social Presence that were gathered over 21 days by 64 participants about the close personal relationships that were meaningful to them. We contrast the communication media they chose to use across four relationship types and whether separations were in the same or in a different city. Our findings are used to discuss new ways of thinking about the connection between people who care about one another, and the meaning of the void that separates them, through the time course of Social Presence and Closeness experiences.

Keywords

Social Presence Closeness Relational communication 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for supporting this work through the Doctoral Training Account.

References

  1. Agnew CR, Loving TJ, Le B, Goodfriend W (2004) Thinking close: Measuring relational closeness as perceived self-other inclusion. In: Mashek DJ, Aron A (eds) Handbook of closeness and intimacy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 103–115Google Scholar
  2. Aron A, Aron E, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol Assoc 63(4):596–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biocca F, Harms C, Burgoon JK (2003) Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence 12(5):456–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradner E, Mark G (2001) Social presence with video and application sharing. In: Proceedings of the 2001 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work. ACM, New York, pp 154–161Google Scholar
  5. Bradner E, Mark G (2002) Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. In: Proceedings of CSCW’02 proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp 226–235Google Scholar
  6. Clark H (1996) Using language, Vol 4.  Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Connell J, Mendelsohn G, Robins R, Canny J (2001) Effects of communication medium on interpersonal perceptions. In: Proceedings of the 2001 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work. ACM, New York, pp 117–124Google Scholar
  8. Daft R, Lengel RH (1985) A proposed integration among organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Manag Sci 32:554–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gooch D, Watts LA (2011a) The magic sock drawer project. In: CHI EA ’11: Extended abstracts of the CHI 2011 conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 243–252. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1979613
  10. Gooch D, Watts LA (2011b) Up close and personal: Social presence in mediated personal relationships. In: BCS-HCI ’11: proceedings of the 25th BCS conference on human-computer interaction. BCS, Swinton, pp 227–236Google Scholar
  11. Gooch D, Watts LA (2012) Yourgloves, hothands and hotmits: devices to hold hands at a distance. In: UIST ’12: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM, New York, pp 157–166. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2380138
  12. Grinnell F (1983) The problem of intersubjectivity: a comparison of Martin Buber and Alfred Schutz. Human Studies 6:185–195. Social presence and the void in distance relationships 13Google Scholar
  13. Kaye J (2006) I just clicked to say i love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication. In: CHI EA ’06: Extended abstracts of the CHI ’06 conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 363–368. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1125530
  14. Lee KW (2004) Presence, explicated. Commun Theory 14(1):27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Milne E (2010) Letters, postcards, email: technologies of presence. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Neustaedter C, Elliot K, Greenberg S (2006) Interpersonal awareness in the domestic realm. In: OZCHI ’06: Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on computer-human interaction: design: activities, artefacts and environments. ACM, New York, pp 15–22Google Scholar
  17. Pace T, Bardzell S, Bardzell J (2010) The rogue in the lovely black dress: intimacy in world of warcraft. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, pp 233–242. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1753361
  18. Riche Y, Riche N, Isenberg P, Bezerianos A (2010) Hard-to-use interfaces considered beneficial (some of the time). In: Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 2705–2714. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1753855
  19. Schultze U (2010) Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds. J Inf Technol 25:434–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shih L, Swan K (2005) Fostering social presence in asynchronous online class discussions. In: CSCL’05: proceedings of the 2005 conference on computer support for collaborative learning. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, pp 602–606. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1149372
  21. Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Thieme A, Wallace J, Thomas J, Chen KL, Kramer N, Olivier P (2011) Lovers’ box: designing for reflection within romantic relationships. Int J Hum Comput Stud 69(5):283–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Baren J, Ijsselsteijn W (2004) Measuring presence: a guide to current measurement approaches. Technical report 5, deliverable of the OmniPress project IST-2001-39237Google Scholar
  24. Walther JB (1995) Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: experimental observations over time. Organ Sci 6(2):186–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Walther JB (1996) Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun Res 23(1):3–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walther JB, Burgoon JK (1992) Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Hum Commun Res 19(11):50–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations