AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 85–96 | Cite as

Computers and classical myths

  • Antonio Fernández-Cano
  • Alfonso Fernández-Guerrero
Open Forum
  • 392 Downloads

Abstract

This paper is a qualitative review of a series of classical myths which are or could be used as interpretative metaphors or similes for people, settings, and situations relating to the Computer World. It will look at basic, widely accepted terms like Trojan or Trojan horse, cyberphobia, or Project Athena. It will also infer others through an exercise in hermeneutical mythopoeia. Examples include Tantalus, representing the controlled obsolescence of technological resources, turning the user into a revived Sisyphus, or Theseus as a powerful anti-virus. Not forgetting the clumsy navigator, Odysseus or Ulysses, representing disperse, inefficient Internet users, and especially the great myth of the teacher Mentor, representing the power of information available on the Internet and searchable via Google.

Keywords

Computer Classical myths Cross-cultural educational topics Pedagogical issues Hermeneutics 

References

  1. Abril A (2006) Mitos y realidad del gobierno de Internet. Rev. Internet Derecho Polít 3. http://idp.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/idp/article/view/400. Accessed 6 June 2012
  2. Anastasiades PS, Filippousis G, Karvunis L, Siakas S, Tomazinakis A, Giza P, Mastoraki H (2010) Interactive videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: a case study in elementary schools in Greece. Comput Educ 54(2):321–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barthes R (1973) Mythologies. Paladin, London. Original in French as: Mythologies (1957)Google Scholar
  4. Berlin I (2005) Vico y el ideal de la Ilustración. In: Berlin I (ed) Antología de ensayos. Espasa-Calpe, Madrid, pp 261–283. Original in English as: The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays (1997)Google Scholar
  5. Bunge M (1984) What is pseudoscience? Skept Inquir 9(1):36–46MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell J, Moyers B (1991) The power of myth. New York, Anchor Edition. http://www.wlcsd.org/webpages/ljarvie/files/campbellmoyers_the_power_of_myth.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2012
  7. Capurro R (2010) Digital hermeneutics: an outline. AI Soc 25(1):35–42. doi:10.1007/s00146-009-0255-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr N (2011) Superficiales ¿Qué está haciendo Internet con nuestras mentes? Taurus, Madrid. Original in English as: The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains (2010)Google Scholar
  9. Cassirer E (1979) Filosofía de las formas simbólicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México. Original in German as: Philosophie der symbolischen formen (1923-1929)Google Scholar
  10. Ciceu C (2003) The syncretic basis of Atalanta Fugiens. J Study Relig Ideol 2(5):168–177Google Scholar
  11. Colley H (2002) A rough guide to the history of mentoring from a Marxist feminist perspective. J Educ Teach 28(3):247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooley M (1995) The myth of the moral neutrality of technology. AI Soc 9(1):10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costa P (2009) Cibersociedad: Mitos y euforias. Soc Utop 34:61–89Google Scholar
  14. Cyber-Robotics (2007) Zeus Internet marketing robot. http://www.cyber-robotics.com/. Accessed 29 May 2012
  15. de Ugarte D (2011) Mitopoiesis: Algunos principios. http://deugarte.com/mitopoiesis-algunos-principios. Accessed 22 May 2012
  16. Dilthey W (1957) Das erlebnis und die lichtung: lessing, Goethe, Novalis. B. G. Teubner, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández-Cano A (2010) Drawing some evaluation patterns inferred from the biblical Gideon’s passage. Educ Assess Eval Acc 22(4):327–343. doi:10.1007/s11092-010-9104-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernández-Cano A, Fernández-Guerrero IM (2003) Spanish eponymy. Eponymy for research evaluation: Spanish cases from the educational field. Res Evaluat 12(3):197–203. doi:10.3152/147154403781776591 Google Scholar
  19. Fernández-Cano A, Fernández-Guerrero IM (2011) The classical myth of Ulysses versus Palamedes: an early metaphor for the qualitative/quantitative debate. Qual Quant 45(3):525–538. doi:10.1007/s11135-010-9310-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernández-Cano A, Torralbo M, Vallejo M, Fernández-Guerrero IM (2012) A narrative review of Greek myths as interpretative metaphors in educational research and evaluation. Educ Res Rev 7(3):238–248. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fez-Barringten F (2011) An architectural history of metaphors. AI Soc 26(1):103–111. doi:10.1007/s00146-010-0280-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuertes FJ (2003) Imprenta e internet. Abaco 37–38:115–124Google Scholar
  23. Gadamer H-G (1991) Verdad y método. Fundamentos de una hermenéutica filosófica, 3rd edn. Sígueme, Salamanca. Original in German as: Wahrheit und Methode: Grindzüge einer philosophischen hermeneutike (1960)Google Scholar
  24. Gadamer H-G (1997) Mito y razón. Paidós, Barcelona. Original in German as: Mythos und vernunft (1956; 1981)Google Scholar
  25. Giddens A (1993) New rules of sociological method: a positive critique of interpretive sociologies, 2nd edn. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Gorayska B, Mey JL (1996) Murphy’s surfers or: where is the green? Lure and lore on the internet. AI Soc 10(3–4):233–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Habermas J (1984) Theory of communicative action. Reason and rationalization of society, vol 1. Beacon Press, Boston. Original in German as: Theorie des kommunikativen handelns (1981)Google Scholar
  28. Hardwick L (2000) Electrifying the canon: the impact of computing on classical studies. Comput Humanit 34(3):279–295. doi:10.1023/A:1002089109613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Havelock EA (1996) La musa aprende a escribir. Reflexiones sobre oralidad y escritura desde la antigüedad hasta el presente. Paidós, Barcelona. Original in English as: The muse learns to write: Reflections on orality and literacy from antiquity to the present (1960)Google Scholar
  30. Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology and other essays. Harper Row, New York. Original in German as: Die frage nach der technik (1949)Google Scholar
  31. Humphreys A (2006) The consumer as Foucauldian “object of knowledge”. Soc Sci Comput Rev 24(3):296–309. doi:10.1177/0894439306287975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ICANN (2011) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. http://www.icann.org/tr/spanish.html; also at: http://www.icann.org. Accessed 26 April 2012
  33. Jackson M (2008) Distracted: the erosion of attention and the coming dark age. Prometheus Books, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson GJ (1992) Talking about computers: from metaphor to jargon. AI Soc 6(3):263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kazamias AM (2009) Agamemnon contra Prometheus: globalisation, knowledge/learning societies and Paideia in the New Cosmopolis. In: Cowen R, Kazamias AM (eds) International handbook of comparative education, vol 22. Springer, Dordrech, pp 1079–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lakoff G, Johnson M (2003) Metaphors we live by (2nd edn.). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. Leonard T (2008) Imagination and mythopoiesis in the science curriculum. In: Leonard T, Willis P (eds) Pedagogies of the imagination. Mythopoetic curriculum in educational practice. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrech, pp 83–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levi-Strauss C (1964) Le cru et le cuit. Plon, ParisGoogle Scholar
  39. Levi-Strauss C (1973) Anthropologie structurale (2nd version). Plon, ParisGoogle Scholar
  40. Maier M (1989) La fuga de Atalanta: Alquimia y emblemática. Tuero, Madrid. Original in Latin as: Atalanta fugiens published in 1617Google Scholar
  41. McCullough K (2009) MythOS. Ace. http://www.amazon.com/MythOS-ebook/dp/B0023EFB3W. Accessed 19 July 2012
  42. Meinel C (2003) Überhacker. More ways to break into a computer (2nd edn.). Available from the author, CD not free, and Amazon.comGoogle Scholar
  43. Mercury Internet (1996) Mercury wireless Internet. http://www.mercuryinternet.com/. Accessed 17 May 2012
  44. Merriam-Webster (2011) Myth. In: The Merriam-Webster unabridged dictionary. Webster Press, Chicago. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/myth. Accessed 4 Jan 2013
  45. Midoro V, Chioccariello A, Persico A, Sarti L, Tavella M (1988) Ariadne’s thread: an introduction to logic programming. Comput Educ 12(1):191–197. doi:10.1016/0360-1315(88)90077-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Montaño Hirose L (1995) Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: a metaphorical approach to ethics. AI Soc 9(1):43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muriel D (2003) La morada del moderno Prometeo: internet como máximo exponente de los Tecn. Inguruak 37:147–163Google Scholar
  48. Neal G (1990) What has Athens to do with Silicon Valley? Questions about the role of computers in literary study. Comput Educ 15(1–3):111–117. doi:10.1016/0360-1315(90)90136-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nolan L (1992) The computational metaphor and environmentalism. AI Soc 6(1):50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ortony A (ed) (1993) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Patton MQ (1999) Myths as normative frames for qualitative interpretation of life stories. Qual Inq 5(3):338–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peelle HA (1983) Computer metaphors: approaches to computer literacy for educators. Comput Educ 7(2):91–99. doi:10.1016/0360-1315(83)90020-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramberg B, Gjesdal K (2009) Hermeneutics. In: Zalta EB (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/hermeneutics/. Accessed 3 Jan 2013
  54. Rosanvallon P (2006) Democracia y desconfianza. Rev Estud Polít 134:219–237Google Scholar
  55. Salas E (2008) XXI una odisea en el ciberespacio: Recorrido Preliminar por el ciberfeminismo. UOC Pap 8. http://www.uoc.edu/uocpapers/7/dt/esp/salas.html. Accessed 22 May 2012
  56. Schleiermacher FD (1998) Hermeneutics and criticism and other writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Original in German as: Hermeneutik und kritik published towards 1820Google Scholar
  57. Schuler D (2012) Doctor Faustus in the twenty-first century. AI & Society, on line. doi:10.1007/s00146-012-0411-5
  58. Simmons D (2008) Los cantos de Hyperión. Ediciones B-Zeta, Barcelona. Original in English as: The Hyperion cantos (1989)Google Scholar
  59. Sperber D, Wilson D (2004) Relevance theory. In: Ward G, Horn L (eds) Handbook of pragmatics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 607–632Google Scholar
  60. Stapleton L (2012) Zarathustra and beyond: exploring culture and values online. AI Soc, on line. doi:10.1007/s00146-012-0412-4
  61. Stein Y (2005) The psychoanalysis of science: the role of metaphor, paraprax, lacunae, and myth. Sussex Academic Press, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  62. Vaknin S (1999) Malignant self-love: narcissism revisited. Narcissus Publications, PragaGoogle Scholar
  63. van Manen M (2010) The pedagogy of Momus technologies. Facebook, privacy, and online intimacy. Qual Health Res 20(8):1023–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vico G (1978) Principios de una ciencia nueva en torno a la naturaleza común de las naciones. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México. Original in Italian as Principi di scienza nuova d’intorno alla comune natura delle nazioni (1744)Google Scholar
  65. Whatis (2011) Whatis. The leading IT encyclopedia and learning center. Computer Glossary, computer terms. http://whatis.techtarget.com/. Accessed 13 June 2012
  66. Witten IH, MacDonald BA, Maulsby DL, Heise R (1992) Programming by example: the human face of AI. AI Soc 6:166–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wittgenstein L (1953/2001) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, Oxford. Original in German as Philosophische Untersuchungen (1951)Google Scholar
  68. Zafra R (2008) El mito netiana. Feminismo/s. Rev Cent Estud Mujer Univ Alicante 11:141–152Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Fernández-Cano
    • 1
  • Alfonso Fernández-Guerrero
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Research Methods in Education, College of Educational SciencesUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Unit of Computer-Aided Architectural Design, Graduate School of ArchitectureUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations