AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 277–287

Toward mutual dependency between empathy and technology

25th Anniversary Volume A Faustian Exchange: What is to be human in the era of Ubiquitous Technology?

Abstract

Technology explosion induced by information explosion will eventually change artifacts into intelligent autonomous agents consisting of surrogates and mediators from which humans can receive services without special training. Four potential problems might arise as a result of the paradigm shift: technology abuse, responsibility flaw, moral in crisis, and overdependence on artifacts. Although the first and second might be resolved in principle by introduction of public mediators, the rest seems beyond technical solution. Under the circumstances, a reasonable goal might be to create a mutual dependency between empathy and technology: Using technology to help people cultivate empathy among people, so empathy in the society may allow people to help each other to recover from disasters beyond the scope of the assumption underlying the society of mediators. I highlight an immersive collaborative interaction environment for helping people share first-person view and its application to building empathic agents.

Keywords

Technology abuse Responsibility flaw Moral in crisis Overdependence on artifacts Empathy Sharing hypothesis Empathic agents Teaching by indwelling Learning by mimicking 

References

  1. Aylett R, Paiva A (2012) Computational modelling of culture and affect. Emot Rev (to appear)Google Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U (1985) Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition 21:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates J (1994) The role of emotion in believable agents. Commun ACM 37(7):122–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breitenberg V (1984) Vehicles: experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Caire P (2009) Designing convivial digital cities: a social intelligence design approach. AI Soc 24(1):97–114MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassell J, Sullivan J, Prevost S, Churchill E (eds) (2000) Embodied conversational agents. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooley M (2007) From judgment to calculation. AI Soc 21(4):395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Gosset/Putnam Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Darwin C (1872) The expression of emotions in man and animals. Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Decker M (2008) Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: the perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment. AI Soc 22(3):315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dennett D (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisenberg N, Eggum ND, Di Giunta L (2010) Empathy-related responding: associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Soc Issues Policy Rev 4(1):143–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallese V, Eagle MN, Migone P (2007) Intentional attunement: mirror neurons and the neural underpinnings of interpersonal relations. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 55:131–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goffman E (1967) Interaction ritual: essays face-to-face behavior. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Gopnik A (2003) The theory as an alternative to the innateness hypothesis. In: Antony LM (ed) Chomsky and his critics. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes-Roth B, Doyle P (1998) Animate characters. Auton Agents Multi-agent Syst 1(2):195–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofstede GJ, Pedersen P, Hofstede G (2002) Exploring culture, exercise, stories and synthetic cultures. Intercultural Press, YarmouthGoogle Scholar
  19. Iacoboni M (2008) Mirroring people—the new science of how we connect with others. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanade T, Narayanan PJ, Rander P (1995) Virtualized reality: concepts and early results. In: IEEE workshop on the representation of visual scenes, pp 69–76Google Scholar
  21. Kant I (1788) Critique of practical reason (trans: Mary G). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitsuregawa M, Nishida T (2010) Special issue on information explosion. New Gener Comput 28(3):207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Lala D, Nishida T (2011a) The interpretation of emotion based on gestural parameters and culture. CMVC 2011, Reykjavik, Iceland, 14 Sept 2011Google Scholar
  25. Lala D, Nishida T (2011b) Towards a virtual environment for capturing behavior in cultural crowds. ICDIM 2011, pp 310–315Google Scholar
  26. Lala D, Nishida T (2011c) VISIE: a spatially immersive interaction environment using real-time human measurement. GrC 2011, pp 363–368Google Scholar
  27. Maurer H (2007) Some ideas on ICT as it influences the future. NEC Technology Forum, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  28. Milgram P, Colquhoun H (1999) A taxonomy of real and virtual world display integration. In: Tamura YOH (ed) Mixed reality: merging real and virtual worlds. Springer, Tokyo, pp 5–30Google Scholar
  29. Mohammad YFO, Nishida T (2010) Learning interaction protocols using augmented bayesian networks applied to guided navigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2010), pp 4119–4126Google Scholar
  30. Mohammad YFO, Nishida T, Okada S (2009) Unsupervised simultaneous learning of gestures, actions and their associations for human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2009), pp 2537–2544Google Scholar
  31. Mori S, Ohmoto Y, Nishida T (2011) Constructing immersive virtual space for HAI with photos. GrC 2011, pp 479–484Google Scholar
  32. Nishida T (ed) (2007) Conversational informatics: an engineering approach. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishida T (2008) Towards robots with good will. In: Nagenborg M, Capurro R (eds) Ethics and robotics. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  34. Nishida T (2009) Artifact-mediated society and social intelligence design. In: Bramer M (ed) Artificial intelligence: an international perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 112–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nishida T (2011) Social intelligence design for intercultural communication. GrC 2011, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 8–10 Nov 2011 Google Scholar
  36. Nishida T, Nishida R (2007) Socializing artifacts as a half mirror of the mind. AI Soc 21(4):549–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ohashi H, Okada S, Ohmoto Y, Nishida T (2010) A proposal of novel WOZ environment for realizing essence of communication in social robots. Social Intelligence Design, London, 13–16 Sept 2010Google Scholar
  38. Ohmoto Y, Miyake T, Nishida T (2010) Estimating Preference structure through human–agent interaction, 3E2 − 2. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Japanese society for artificial intelligence (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  39. Ohmoto Y, Ohashi H, Lala D, Mori S, Sakamoto K, Kinoshita K, Nishida T (2011) ICIE: immersive environment for social interaction based on socio-spacial information. In: Conference on technologies and applications of artificial intelligence (TAAI 2011), Taoyuan, Taiwan, pp 119–125Google Scholar
  40. Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pentland A (2008) Honest signals—how they shape our world. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents—living with high-risk technologies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Pickard WR (1997) Affective computing. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Doubleday & Co., Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  45. Prendinger H, Ishizuka M (eds) (2004) Life-like characters—tools, affective functions and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C (2008) Mirrors in the brain: how our minds share actions, emotions, and experience? Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Thovuttikul S, Lala D, Ohashi H, Okada S, Ohmoto Y, Nishida T (2011) Simulated crowd: towards a synthetic culture for engaging a learner in culture-dependent nonverbal interaction. 2nd workshop on eye gaze in intelligent human machine interaction at IUI 2011, CA, USA, 13 Feb 2011Google Scholar
  50. Weizenbaum J (1966) ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun ACM 9(1):36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Winograd T (1972) Understanding natural language. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Yano M (2012) Construction of 3-dimensional recording environments for multi-party conversation with RGB-depth sensors. Master thesis, Department of Intelligence Science and Technology, Kyoto University (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations