AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 465–477 | Cite as

Gendering the digital body: women and computers

Original Article

Abstract

As we live in a culture where “everything can be commodified, measured and calculated and can be put in the competitive market for sale, detached from its roots and purpose,” there is need to redefine our humanness in terms of the changing nature of science, technology, and their deeper impact on human life. More than anything else, it is Information Technology that now has tremendous influence on all spheres of our life, and in a sense, IT has become the destiny of our life. And this is where the real trauma lies. On the one hand, our being in the cyberspace opens up new and exciting horizons before us; on the other hand, we ourselves are changed and transformed in the process. The virtual world transforms human users to a problem-solver technocrat. The speed at which Information Technology is changing the way that youth around the world are socializing, playing, and researching, it is the common practice now for a 15-year old to go home and update their MySpace page, followed by playing online games, or looking up the new trendy YouTube video. These forms of technology are often the topic of adolescent conversations as YouTube, blogs, e-magazines, Face book, MySpace, iPhones, and iPods dominate the commercial and social networking market. Some researchers refer to this phenomenon as ubiquitous technology drawing attention to the fact that ubiquitous technology acknowledges the speedy adoption of day-to-day use of technology as a global phenomenon. In this background, this article aims at revisiting the question, “What is to be human in the era of Ubiquitous Technology?” From a feminist perspective, one can still redefine the boundaries between femininity and masculinity in the context of IT and its impact on our lifestyle and thought style. While examining the ways in which our definitions of “woman” and “man” are shifting in this new communication environment, Elizabeth Lane Lawley observes that we cannot fix a single center from which the experiences of women with computer and communication systems can be viewed and that such fixity would only serve to deepen inequities rather than exposing and removing them. She finally submits, “It is possible to use new theoretical perspectives on the shifting boundaries of gender definitions to rethink a previously deterministic view of the effect of new technologies on society, and particularly the effect of those technologies on women. While the gradual absence of the subject from the field of Artificial Intelligence leads to the invisibility of feminine care along with social and relational nature of man, some feminists dismiss the biological sex distinction on such issues and encourage females to ‘imitate man’ and to become more aggressive, assertive and dominating” (Lawley 1993). What are the possible impacts of this new technology on the so-called feminine traits of our human nature? How far our definitions of “woman” and “man” are shifting in this new communication environment? This is what this article seeks to explore.

Keywords

ICT Computer Digital body Cyborg Gender Feminism Culture-Western Eastern Indian Globalization 

References

  1. Alcoff LM (2005) The metaphysics of sex and gender. In: Feminist interventions in ethics and politics. Rowman and Littlefield, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhasin K, Nighat SK (1994) Some questions on feminism & its relevance in South Asia. Kali for women, Delhi, pp 4–8Google Scholar
  3. Boden M (1970) Artificial intelligence and natural man. Basic, New York, pp 463–483Google Scholar
  4. Brosnan M (1998) Technophobia. The psychological impact of information technology. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler J (1990) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatterjee P (1990) The nationalist resolution of the women’s question. In: Recasting women: essays in colonial history. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 233–253Google Scholar
  7. Chaudhuri M (2005) Feminism in India. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/6475354/Feminism_in_India
  8. Derrick J, Myna T (2011) Video games and violence. Online available. http://www.socsci.mcmaster.ca/soc/courses/stpp4C03/ClassEssay/videogames.htm. Last retrieved March 2011
  9. Durrant W (1935) Story of civilization: our oriental heritage. MJF Books, p 401Google Scholar
  10. Gomez R (2000) The hall of mirrors: the internet in Latin America. Curr Hist 99(634):72–90Google Scholar
  11. Green L (2002) Communication, technology and society. Routlege, London, pp 171–190Google Scholar
  12. Harraway D (1991) A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In: Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of natureGoogle Scholar
  13. Harding S (1986) The science question in feminism. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooks B (1989) Talking back: thinking feminist, thinking black. South End Press, Rowman and Littlefield, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaggar A (2001) Feminist Ethics. In: Encyclopedia of ethics, vol 2/e. Routledge, New York, pp 528–539Google Scholar
  16. Johnson V (2010) Women and the internet: a micro study in Chennai, India. Indian J Gend Stud 17:151–163Google Scholar
  17. Keller EF (1985) Reflections on gender and science. Yale UP, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawley EL (1993) Computers and the communication of gender. Available online at http://www.itcs.com/elawley/gender.html. Last consulted 12 May 2011
  19. McDermott RF, Kripal JJ (2003) Encountering Kali: in the margins, at the center, in the West. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  20. Nayar P (2004) Virtual worlds and politics in the age of cyber technology. Sage Publications, New Delhi, pp 280–281Google Scholar
  21. Nicholas FG (1997) The yogi and the goddess. Int J Hindu Stud 1:2Google Scholar
  22. Perry R, Greber L (1990) Women and computers: an introduction. Signs J Women Culture Soc 16(1):74–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roszak T (1994) The cult of information. Berkeley U. Berkeley, Berkeley, p 233Google Scholar
  24. Spivak GC (2007) Moving devi. In: Other Asias. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 195–197Google Scholar
  25. Status of Wonmr, Status of women in indian society: a socio-historical perspective. Online www.jstor.org/stable/3516124. Retrieved November 2011
  26. Stepulevage L (1999) A technologist in the making: days in a girl’s life. Inform Comm Soc 2(4):399–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sugirtharajah S (2002) Hinduism and feminism: some concerns. J Fem Stud Relig 18(2):97(8)Google Scholar
  28. Tamborini R, Eastin MS, Shalski P, Lachlan K, Fediuk TA, Brady R (2004) Violent virtual video games and hostile thoughts. J Broadcast Electron Media 48:335Google Scholar
  29. Turckle S (1988) Artificial intelligence and psychoanalysis: a new alliance. Daedalus 17(1)Google Scholar
  30. Turckle S, Papert S (1990) From hard drive to software: gender, computers, and difference. Signs 16(1):128–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ute F (1995) Men of honor: a social and cultural history of the duel. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Valentine E (2009) Gender differences in learning and achievement in mathematics, science and technology and strategies for equity: a literature review. In: Psychological foundations of education for pre-service teachers EDCI 4124, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Wajcanon J (1991) Feminism confronts technology. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesIIT GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Hindu CollegeUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations