AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 207–212

Relationships of sonification to music and sound art

Original Article

Abstract

The definition of sonification has been reframed in recent years but remains somewhat in flux; the basic concepts and procedural flows have remained relatively unchanged. Recent definitions have focused on the objective the important uses of sonification in terms of scientific method. The full realization of the potential of the field must also include the craft and art of music composition. The author proposes examining techniques of sonification in a two-order framework: direct and procedural. The impact of new technologies and historical roots of that work argues that framing this broad topic should be in terms inclusive of scientific method and craftsmanship and art. The expressive use of sonic time-based data flows needs to be refined and expanded. The unexamined territory of how a broad-based population of listeners on a subjective, as well as objective level needs, have to be included in this new field.

Keywords

Sonification Composition Sound Art 

References

  1. Adorno T (1994) Vers une musique informelle. In: Quasi una fantasia. Verso, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Chabris Ch, Simons D (2009) The invisible Gorilla (and other ways our intuitions deceive us). Crown Archetype, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Gresham-Lancaster S (1998) The aesthetics and history of the hub: the effects of changing technology on network computer music. Leonardo Music J 8:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heidegger M (2002) Poetry, language, thought: what are poets for. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Hermann T (2008) Sonification—a definition. http://sonification.de/main-def.shtml. Accessed 2 Nov 2011
  6. Kostelanetz R, Darby J (1996) Classic essays on twentieth-century music. Wadsworth Publishing, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  7. Kramer G, Walker B (2005) Sonification design and metaphors: comments on Walker and Kramer, ICAD 1996. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2(4):415–416Google Scholar
  8. McLuhan M, Fiore Q (1967) The medium is the massage: an inventory of effects. Produced by Jerome Agel; 1st Ed.: Random House; reissued by Gingko Press, 2001Google Scholar
  9. Minsky M (1981) Music, mind, and meaning. Comput Music J 5(3):38–40Google Scholar
  10. Nørretranders T (1998) The user illusion: cutting consciousness down to size. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Patterson D (ed) (2002) John Cage: music, philosophy, and intention 1933–1950. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Schneider B (2010) An avant-garde for the world; Xenakis at the worlds fair. http://chicagoartcriticism.com/2010/05/31/an-avant-garde-for-the-world-xenakis-at-the-worlds-fair. Accessed 31 May 2010
  13. Smith O (1998) Fluxus: the history of an attitude. San Diego State University Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  14. Tenney J (1988) META + HODOS and META Meta + Hodos: a phenomenology of 20th century musical materials and an approach to the study of form. In: Larry Polansky (ed) Section II. Gestalt-factors of cohesion and segregation. Frog Peak Music, Oakland, p 28Google Scholar
  15. Thibault B, Gresham-Lancaster S (1997) Experiences in digital terrain: using digital elevation models for music and interactive multimedia. Leonardo Music J 7:11–15Google Scholar
  16. Tufte E (2006) Beautiful evidence. Graphis Press, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  17. Xenakis I (1992) Formalized music: thought and mathematics in composition. Pendragon Press, StuyvesantGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media and Academic TechnologyCalifornia State University East BayHaywardUSA

Personalised recommendations