AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 25–42 | Cite as

Witness and presence in the work of Pierre Huyghe

Original Article

Abstract

The relation between “presence” and “representation” is an age-old topic in the arts, but it is further complicated in our time of advanced media conditions. Pierre Huyghe is one artist who has consistently addressed questions of presence and representation throughout his artistic oeuvre, including the role of the witness within it. Considering the sophistication of Huyghe’s work with regard to the riddle of presence in the realm of contemporary means of representation, the artist’s work is taken as a case study for a broad range of artists exploring related topics within the arts and the media. This paper argues that art that interrogates the question of presence within the context of contemporary media culture—from Marina Abramović to Stelarc, Jeffrey Shaw to Julia Scher—asks for being interpreted through presence theories developed within the field of media studies in addition to methods of art theory and criticism. Accordingly, Huyghe’s work is productively related to one such theory, namely the YUTPA model by Caroline Nevejan, which theorizes the interrelated concepts of natural, mediated, and witnessed presence.

Keywords

Pierre Huyghe Contemporary art Media Presence Representation 

References

  1. Baker G (2004a) No title. October 110:49–50Google Scholar
  2. Baker G (2004b) Interview with Pierre Huyghe. October 110:80–107Google Scholar
  3. Baudrillard J (1994) Simulacra and simulation. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin W (1969) The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In: Hannah Arendt (ed) Illuminations. Schocken Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop C (2004) Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October 110:51–80Google Scholar
  6. Bourriaud N (1996a) Pierre Huyghe, Les relations en temps réel. Art Press 219:48–52Google Scholar
  7. Bourriaud N (1996b) Space-time in the 1990s. In traffic. Capcmusée d’Art Contemporaine, BordeauxGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourriaud N (1998) Ésthetique relationelle. Les Presses du Réel, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchloh B (2001) Control by design. Art Forum 40(1):162–163Google Scholar
  10. Debord G (1995) The society of the spectacle. Zone Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Derrida J (1987) The double session. In: Disseminations. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillick L (2006) Letters and responses. October 115:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham D (1979) Video, architecture, television, writings on video and video works 1970–1978. The Press of Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, HalifaxGoogle Scholar
  14. Grau O (2003) Virtual art: from illusion to immersion. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Grau O (ed) (2007) Media art histories. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Haraway D (1991) Situated knowledge’s: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Free Associations books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Huyghe H (2000) The third memory. Centre Pompidou, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. Kittler F (1999) Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Krauss RE (1999) “A voyage on the north sea”: art in the age of the post-medium condition. Thames & Hudson, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Krauss RE (2004) Post structuralism and deconstruction. In: Forster Hal et al (eds) Art since 1900, vol. 1. Thames & Hudson, New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Luhmann N (2000) Reality of the mass media. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyotard JF (1984) The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  23. McDonough T (2004) No ghost. October 110:107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer T (2001) Mediokratie, die kolonisierung der politik durch die medien. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt-am-MainGoogle Scholar
  25. Nevejan C (2007) Presence and the design of trust. Ph.D. Dissertation. Amsterdam University, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Oliver K (2001) Witnessing, beyond recognition. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  27. Rajchman J (1985) The postmodern museum. Art Am 73:110–117Google Scholar
  28. Rajchman J (1998) Jean-Francois Lyotard’s underground aesthetics. October 86:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salter C (2010) Entangled: technology and the transformation of performance. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaw J, Weibel P (2003) Future cinema: the cinematic imaginary after film. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Turkle S (1995) Life on the screen: identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Turkle S (2009) Simulation and its discontents. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. van der Meulen S (1995) A shift. In Shift. De Appel Foundation, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  34. van der Meulen S (1996) Traffic. Metropolis 2:55Google Scholar
  35. van der Meulen S (2009) The problem of media in contemporary art theory (1960–1990). Ph.D. Dissertation. School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner AM (2000) Performance, video, and the rhetoric of presence. October 91:59–80Google Scholar
  37. Weber S (1996) Television, set and screen. In Mass Mediauras: Form, Technics, Media. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Weber S (2008) Benjamin’s abilities. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Art HistoryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations