Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 113–122 | Cite as

Minor architecture: poetic and speculative architectures in public space

  • Xin Wei Sha
Editorial
  • 378 Downloads

Computer science and software engineering has adopted the term “architecture” to describe the composition of large, complex sets of interoperating code that often contain multiple concurrent operations. “Software programmer”, “software engineer”, and “systems architect” denote an increasing scale of experience and ability to carry out systemic analysis and design. The status accorded to the software architect mimics in some ways the status accorded architects proper. On the lee-side of the tipping point where more media attention is paid to computer media and informatic technologies than to 20c media of cinema, radio, and television, it is easy to forget the enormous capital and power bound up in the industries of our physical built environment, and the intellectual and social prestige worn by its designers, the architects. This issue of AI & Society focuses on the encounter between the new potentials for architectural environment, the design of the built environment, and the emerging...

Keywords

Public Space Computational Medium Architectural Scale Corporeal Experience Spatial Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I compliment the energetic group of artists and critics who participated in the Topological Media Lab’s soft architecture seminar over years 2007--2009. Together with the contributors, we are grateful for the intellectual and artistic companionship offered by fellow travelers including Ann-Marie Korpi, Helga Wild, Patrick Harrop, Ayesha Hameed, Gabriel Levine, Michael Fortin, Toni Dove, Madeline Gins and Shusaku Arakawa, Erin Manning, Brian Massumi, and members of the TML, the Dream and Nightmare Lab, and the SenseLab.

References

  1. Alexander C (1979) A timeless way of building. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander C (2002–2004) The nature of order, 4 vols. Center for Environmental Structure, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin J (1975) How to do things with words, 2nd edn. The William James Lectures 1955. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Debord G [1994 (1967)] The society of the spectacle. Zone Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Deleuze G [2006 (1988)] The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Continuum, London; New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Deleuze G, Guattari F [1987 (1980)] A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  7. Diller E, Scofidio R (2002) Blur: the making of nothing. Harry N. Abrams, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Eclats (1999) Temps fugace, temps précaire, Quaderns D’arquitectura I Urbanisme vol. 224 décembre. In: Ortega L, Mestre J, Bercedo I (eds) Editorial Formentera, S.A., BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  9. Gins M, Arakawa S (2002) Architectural body. University of Alabama Press, TuscaloosaGoogle Scholar
  10. Heidegger M (1951) Building dwelling thinking. In: Poetry, language, thought. HarperCollins Canada/Harper Trade, 2001Google Scholar
  11. Hooper B (2002) Urban space, modernity, and masculinist desire: the utopian lusts of Le Corbusier. In: Bingaman A, Sanders L, Zorach R (eds) Embodied utopias: gender, social change, and the modern metropolis. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs J (1985) Cities and the wealth of nations: principles of economic life. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Karatani K (1995) Architecture as metaphor: language, number, money, writing architecture. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Lunn F (2008) Soft architecture (unpublished abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Matta-Clark Gordon (2007) Gordon Matta Clark: you are the measure. Whitney Museum of American Art; Yale University Press, New Haven ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  16. Searle J (1980) Speech act theory and pragmatics. D. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Stengers I (2002) Beyond conversation: the risks of peace. In: Daniell A, Keller C (eds) Process and difference: between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms. SUNY, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Topological Media LabEV-7-725, Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations