, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 93–102 | Cite as

The ‘measure of a man’ and the ethos of hospitality: towards an ethical dwelling with technology

Original Article


In this paper, I argue for the impossible possibility of an ethical dwelling with technology. In arguing for an ethical comportment in our dealing with technology, I am not only arguing for the consideration of the ethical implications of technology (which we already do) but also, and more importantly, for an ethics of technological artefacts qua technology. Thus, I attempt to argue for a decentering (or rather overcoming) of anthropocentric ethics, urging us to move beyond any centre, whatever it may be—anthropological, biological, etc. I argue that if we take ethics seriously we must admit that our measure cannot be that of man. To develop the argument, I use an episode in Star Trek where the fate of the highly sophisticated android Commander Data is to be decided. I show how the moral reasoning about Data remains anthropocentric but hints to other possibilities. I proceed to use the work of Derrida and Levinas (with some help from Heidegger) to suggest a possible way to think (and do) an ethos beyond traditional ethics—an ethics of hospitality in which we dwell in a community of those that have nothing in common.


  1. Benso S (2000) The face of things. State University of New York, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  2. Brey P (2000) Disclosive computer ethics. Comput Soc 30(4):10–16Google Scholar
  3. Brown N (2007) The inorganic open: nanotechnology and physical being. Radic Philos 144:33–44Google Scholar
  4. Caputo J (1993) Against ethics. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Critchley S (1999) The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  6. Davy BJ (2007) ‘An other face of ethics in levinas.’ Ethics Environ 12(1):39–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derrida J (1992) Force of the law: the “mystical foundation of authority”. In: Cornell D, Rosenfeld M, Carlson DG (eds) Deconstruction, the possibility of justice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Derrida J (1999) Hospitality, justice and responsibility: a dialogue with Jacques Derrida. In: Kearney R, Dooley M (eds) Questioning ethics: contemporary debates in philosophy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida J (2002) On cosmopolitanism in cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Floridi L (2003) On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics Inf Technol 4(4):287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodpaster KE (1978) On being morally considerable. J Philos 75:303–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haraway D (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Harman G (2002) Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court Publishing, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Harman G (2005) Guerrilla metaphysics: phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Open Court Publishing, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidegger M (1977a) Martin Heidegger: basic writings (trans: David Farrell Krell). HarperCollins Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidegger M (1977b) The question concerning technology, and other essays (trans: William Lovitt). Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes R (1991) The shock of the new: art and the century of change. BBC Books and Thames and Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Husserl EE (1970/1929) Cartesian meditations: an introduction to phenomenology (trans: Cairns D). M. Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  19. Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Introna LD (2001) Virtuality and morality: on (not) being disturbed by the other. Philos Contemp World 8(1):31–39Google Scholar
  21. Introna LD (2002) On the (Im)possibility of ethics in a mediated world. Inf Organ 12(2):71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Introna LD (2003) Workplace surveillance “is” unethical and unfair. Surveill Soc 1(2):210–216Google Scholar
  23. Introna LD, Nissenbaum H (2000) The internet as a democratic medium: why the politics of search engines matters. Inf Soc 16(3):169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Irwin S (2006) Technological other/quasi other: reflection on lived experience. Hum Stud 28(4):453–467CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Leopold A (1966) A sand county almanac. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Levinas E (1967) Totality and infinity: an essay on exteriority (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Duquesne University Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  28. Levinas E (1991[1974]) Otherwise than being or beyond essence (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. Levinas E (1996) “Ethics as first philosophy.” The Levinas Reader (Hand S (ed) trans: Michael B. Smith). Blackwell, London, pp 75–87Google Scholar
  30. Lingis A (1994) The community of those who have nothing in common. Indiana UP, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. Naess A (1995) Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Singer P (1977) Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. Avon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Star Trek (2003) The next generation, “the measure of a man”, Transcript #40272-135, Located at, Accessed 26 January 2003
  34. Winner L (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109:121–136Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Study of Technology and OrganisationLancaster University Management SchoolLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations