Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 53–60 | Cite as

A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann’s philosophy of technology and human–computer interaction

  • Daniel Fallman
Original Article

Abstract

Traditional human–computer interaction (HCI) allowed researchers and practitioners to share and rely on the ‘five E’s’ of usability, the principle that interactive systems should be designed to be effective, efficient, engaging, error tolerant, and easy to learn. A recent trend in HCI, however, is that academic researchers as well as practitioners are becoming increasingly interested in user experiences, i.e., understanding and designing for relationships between users and artifacts that are for instance affective, engaging, fun, playable, sociable, creative, involving, meaningful, exciting, ambiguous, and curious. In this paper, it is argued that built into this shift in perspective there is a concurrent shift in accountability that is drawing attention to a number of ethical, moral, social, cultural, and political issues that have been traditionally de-emphasized in a field of research guided by usability concerns. Not surprisingly, this shift in accountability has also received scarce attention in HCI. To be able to find any answers to the question of what makes a good user experience, the field of HCI needs to develop a philosophy of technology. One building block for such a philosophy of technology in HCI is presented. Albert Borgmann argues that we need to be cautious and rethink the relationship as well as the often-assumed correspondence between what we consider useful and what we think of as good in technology. This junction—that some technologies may be both useful and good, while some technologies that are useful for some purposes might also be harmful, less good, in a broader context—is at the heart of Borgmann’s understanding of technology. Borgmann’s notion of the device paradigm is a valuable contribution to HCI as it points out that we are increasingly experiencing the world with, through, and by information technologies and that most of these technologies tend to be designed to provide commodities that effortlessly grant our wishes without demanding anything in return, such as patience, skills, or effort. This paper argues that Borgmann’s work is relevant and makes a valuable contribution to HCI in at least two ways: first, as a different way of seeing that raises important social, cultural, ethical, and moral issues from which contemporary HCI cannot escape; and second, as providing guidance as to how specific values might be incorporated into the design of interactive systems that foster engagement with reality.

Keywords

User Experience Interactive System Compact Disc Cultural Information Natural Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blevis E (2007) Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp 503–512Google Scholar
  2. Borgmann A (1984) Technology and the character of contemporary life. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Borgmann A (1992) Crossing the postmodern divide. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgmann A (1999) Holding onto reality: the nature of information at the turn of the millennium. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgmann A (2000) Reply to my critics. In: Higgs E, Light A, Strong D (eds) Technology, the good life?. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Fallman D (2003a) In romance with the materials of mobile interaction: a phenomenological approach to the design of mobile information technology. Doctoral Thesis, Umea University, Sweden: Larsson & Co:s TryckeriGoogle Scholar
  8. Fallman D (2003b) Design-oriented human–computer interaction. Proceedings of CHI2003, conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI Letters, vol 5, issue no. 1 (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, April 5–10). ACM Press, New York, pp 225–232Google Scholar
  9. Gaver B (2002) Designing for Humo Ludens, 13 Magazine. Nr 12:2–6Google Scholar
  10. Gaver B, Dunne T, Pacenti E (1999) Design: cultural probes. Interactions 6(1):21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Ihde D (1993) Philosophy of technology: an introduction. Paragon House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Jordan PW (1999) Pleasure with products: Human factors for body, mind and soul. Human factors in product design: current practice and future trends. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 206–217Google Scholar
  14. Jordan PW (2000) Designing pleasurable products: an introduction to the new human factors. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. MacKenzie IS (1992) Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human–computer interaction. Hum Comput Interact 7:91–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Masterman M (1970) The nature of a paradigm in criticism and the growth of knowledge. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitcham C (1994) Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Nardi BA (ed) (1996) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human–computer interaction. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Strong D, Higgs E (2000) Borgmann’s philosophy of technology. In: Higgs ES, Light A, Strong D (eds) Technology and the good life?. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human—machine communication. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson B (1989) The place of qualitative research in contemporary social science: the importance of post-paradigmatic thought, advances in social science methodology, vol 1Google Scholar
  23. Verbeek PP (2002) Devices of engagement: on Borgmann’s philosophy of information and technology. Techné: Res Philos Technol 6(1):69–92Google Scholar
  24. Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, NorwoodzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Interactive InstituteKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations